Although both poems are dedicated to the god of love “Eros”,but their feelings towards Eros depicts him very differently. Bridges’s poem focuses on praising Ero’s purity, being the leader of the human race, speaking in a very innocence and naivety tone. However, Stevenson speaks down on the Eros in his poem because Eros has been abused by the human race in the way they love, giving the poem a very negative tone. The use in diction and imagery is used in both poems to help emphasize the difference in tone. The diction used in Bridge’s poem is to show how holy Eros by using words such as “thou” and “thy”. However, in Stevenson’s poem, the speaker addresses Eros as “you” and even as “my bully boy”, evoking a negative tone. Stevenson, uses words such as “overuse” and “slave” to describe Eros being a dirty being and not worthy of being called a god. Also, suggesting that the endless demands of humanly love caused the god Eros to become this broken down creature implying it was the human race that took the god down his holy position. While Bridges suggests …show more content…
Bridges paints a saintly picture of Eros; “like to his gods in thy proud dress, Thy Starry sheen of nakedness”. Showing Eros to be a heavenly pure creature giving the poem a very calm feeling/tone, however, Eros is still out of the human races reach and whatever the humans do it will not affect Eros in any way. However, in Stevenson’s poem, it is the complete opposite picture/image. Eros is shown to be an essentially ugly being with a corrupted face, like that of a boxer “this thug with broken nose, and so squinty eyes”, changing the tone from calm and relaxed to being negative. The speaker in Bridges speaks as though the god has acquired their (humans) approval where Stevenson has disapproval (because the god is looked down upon). What God gets beaten up and taken advantage of by the impure human
These two poems are written by poets with completely different social statuses. This differing factor leads to two completely different perspectives on the
Comparing the Forgotten God of Love in Robert Bridges’ Poem EPÙÓ and Anne Stevenson’s Poem Eros
The utilization of symbolism within both poems enables the narrators to indicate what drives their stories: love. Both Poe and Noyes employ the symbols of “moon” and “moonlight” within their
Furthermore, some differences between the two poems are the social statuses of the main characters. In “Cross” the young mulatto is not accepted of favored by either of his races. He is pushed to the outside and
Some poems are similar. Some are different. Some, however, can have aspects that are both similar and different. In the poems “O Captain, My Captain” and “Shiloh: A Requiem” many literary aspects are used. Some of these include repetition, imagery, extended metaphors, and personification. Although the poems “O Captain, My Captain” and “Shiloh: A Requiem” have very different literary elements, they have some in common as well.
Even a critic such as Alfred Murtagh, who purports to “generally agree” with Niles, admits that “there is a great deal in the poem that provokes the sort of reading [Niles] opposes, and somehow one must account for this.”4
In today’s modern view, poetry has become more than just paragraphs that rhyme at the end of each sentence. If the reader has an open mind and the ability to read in between the lines, they discover more than they have bargained for. Some poems might have stories of suffering or abuse, while others contain happy times and great joy. Regardless of what the poems contains, all poems display an expression. That very moment when the writer begins his mental journey with that pen and paper is where all feelings are let out. As poetry is continues to be written, the reader begins to see patterns within each poem. On the other hand, poems have nothing at all in common with one another. A good example of this is in two poems by a famous writer by
As a reader, one has to compare and contrast pieces of literature one reads. Although, one doesn't realize it at the moment many of the literature one reads has a lot in common, it's easier to recognize similarities in literature written by one author. Comparing and contrasting pieces of literature truly help a reader grow. It helps one understand the literature and the writer even better. Robert Browning was a very well known for his poems Life in a Love and Porphyria's Lover. These two poems have a lot in common, and a lot of differents. There are two ways these two poems are greatly alike and one way they are different.
Another similarity can be found in both of the poems due to their mutual usage of the same Greek myth, which is about Icarus. The Dictionary of Classical Mythology details the myth of Icarus as follows, “At first all went well as they flew out over the sea, but then Icarus was fatally
In this image Eros is a strong young man who seems to have a purpose. It seems logical for a man to be used to depict this mythological scene because it is not very logical for a baby to be carrying the weight of a young woman. If this image was one of Eros as a baby, an
Therefore we have two poems which are deliberately changing their structure from the norm in order to create effect. However, these effects have totally different intentions, which lead to the end of the similarities and the first of many differences between the two poems.
There are many speculations about what happens after you die. Where does that person soul go? Is there a heaven or hell? These are questions everyone wonders and will not know until that time comes. However, many people have conducted their own versions of the underworld and after life and in this essay I will compare and contrast the two visions of Homer’s Odyssey and Plato’s version of Er in the republic. This two stories tell a tale of the underworld and make some of the same references while also holding different views as well. Therefore, with these tales being somewhat similar their views of the underworld are completely different.
Not only do these poems share differences through the speakers childhood, but also through the tones of the works.
“The relationship between the energies of the inquiring mind that an intelligent reader brings to the poem and the poem’s refusal to yield a single comprehensive interpretation enacts vividly the everlasting intercourse between the human mind, with its instinct to organise and harmonise, and the baffling powers of the universe about it.”
American mass media is a huge contributor to the demonization of Muslims. A grisly beheading results in days of media coverage. Muslim leaders holding a press conference denouncing terrorism, which they have done extensively in response to ISIS, will result in two to three minutes of media coverage on cable news. This is terrifyingly inaccurate considering less than 10% of terrorist threats and actions are from Islamic terrorists. America Instead of reacting to any of these attacks as they had Right-wing Timothy McVeigh's attack in April 19, 1995. America would start the mislabeled “War on terror” proceeding to pigeonhole Islamic extremism and brush aside the motivations of groups likes McVeigh and other group’s violent actions. Compounding this issue is that there are few positive images of Muslims or Muslim Americans in American entertainment media. In fact, even many Muslims are shockingly ignorant of their own religion. With no official leadership or governance like in many Christian religious, Islam falls more