preview

Comparing Romano's Virgin And Child

Good Essays

There are two particular paintings currently on display at The Museum of the Fine Arts, Houston that are so similar in appearance and content, but their intentions and purposes differ dramatically. These two paintings, both relating to the virgin and the child, are the Master of the Straus Madonna’s Virgin and Child (Museum of Fine Arts, Houston), dated c. 1395-1400, and created much later, Antoniazzo Romano’s Virgin and Child with Donor (Museum of Fine Arts, Houston), dated c. 1430-1512. Within a hundred years, these two artists, as well as many others, developed pieces of grandeur that have been the subject of speculation and analyzation to this day. Why? Because of their nuances that make them traditional in their own isolated ways. Whether …show more content…

Romano’s Virgin and the Child with Donor shares the ownership of an element of naturalism, but in a different area. When beholding the beauty of the painting and its exaggerated warmth and ideal bodily appearances, one might notice the realism of a motherly embrace with her baby coddled closely to her. The first possesses naturalism through appearance, despite the child’s maturity, but the second holds more reality with its emotional content of love. Another difference of artistic advancement between the two paintings is their own representations of three-dimensional form and space. Indeed, both of the paintings seem to pop out of their mediums in a life like many on account of their backdrops and the technique of the artists, but Romano’s painting contains a special addition to this method with the subjects of the painting making eye contact with the viewer. This eye contact creates the illusion of reality to the artwork that causes the viewer to have a more intimate impression of the painting by Romano than the Straus piece. Other artists of these eras experimented with lighting and backgrounds, whereas Giotto used naturalism with different textures, such as silky …show more content…

The Straus Virgin and Child portrays a woman gazing at the child in her arms as if she is not actually holding him. As mentioned in the previous paragraph, there is an extreme level of reverence being related to the child from the virgin, who seems to have almost no personal relationship with the baby. In turn, the baby seems to be holding a dove in his hand in such a way that causes him to appear in perfect control of himself- complete awareness of his own actions, despite his evident age. In the times of the middle ages, it was difficult to view Jesus as a close and personal being because of the current religious system that was in effect. Religion often acted as a method of conviction and manipulation, therefore, depicting Mary as the virgin with baby Jesus as the child in a loving embrace was unheard of. Having a personal and loving relationship with Christ had not yet become accessible. Romano’s Virgin and Child with Donor, on the other hand, was completely different. The virgin is seen lovingly caressing her child with a gentle touch as the child clings to her in kind. The baby is held upright by the mother, being more realistic to the apparent age, and seems at perfect peace as he presents the dove in his hand like a toddler might present a toy. With the coming Renaissance era, as well as the uprising of the Protestant Reformation, a relationship with Christ became

Get Access