Carver’s and Gilman’s Explanation of the Dynamics of Power in Relationships. Relationships between individuals can present many obstacles that deserve attention for resolution. The disparity in power between two people is a significant barrier that arises in both real life and fiction. This imbalance of power has an impact on a couple bound for romance as well as a couple of guys who are meant to become companions. Throughout Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s short story, “The Yellow Wallpaper” and Raymond Carver’s, “Cathedral,” the balance of power between two characters when they engage with each other is present. However, the two stories have different power dynamics, resulting in extremely different story resolutions. As the plots of both stories …show more content…
She constantly has to hide her thoughts and ideas to protect herself from John’s disappointment in her. John’s power dynamic is negative, resulting in mass hysteria as too much negative energy tends to outweigh the positive energy his wife continues to portray through everything she is enduring. Despite that, John’s overwhelming amount of negative energy leads his wife to slowly break free from his control. As she begins to become “a little afraid of John'' (Gilman 58), she learns that she is not fully under his control. The narrator realizes that she can have a dramatic release from John’s grasp of her life. She finally has a feeling of relief as she realizes that “life is very much more exciting now than it used to be” (Gilman 59). As the narrator senses a profuse amount of internal power, she begins to stop abiding by the rules of John. The narrator takes her daily life by choice of what makes her happy. When John has full realization of this, he makes demands (Gilman 63) in an attempt to gain control over his wife. However, she has lost respect for John. The uneven balance of power between John and his wife was a major disturbance to their
Perhaps the week that John and Margaret had spent apart had caused her to imagine and believe her life was more perfect than it truly was. It is mentioned that “they had been quarreling when he left” (Jackson 64) and she was taking their time apart to get hold of herself again. It could be, during this time, she had imagined a better life for herself and generated an image in her head of their marriage that was not reality. When John arrived, she started paying closer attention to things he was doing that he would not normally have
Analysis: The above quotations clearly display the similarity between John and the Narrator’s relationship to that of a father and a daughter. John controls the majority of the Narrator’s behavior to the point she feels an overwhelming sense of guilt for her incapacity as John’s wife. The Narrator is restricted in her actions and is therefore unable to fulfil her wifely duties, forcing her to consider herself as a burden. When is reality, John treats the Narrator as his daughter and does not permit her to complete her duty. For instance, the Narrator dislikes the yellow wallpaper and wishes to have it removed; however, John does not allow her to do so and acts as if it would feed into a child’s stubbornness. His continued belief in his superiority disregards the Narrator as is wife and instead infantilizes her. He believes her identity exists only through him, which merely encourages his paternalistic
She appears (to the reader’s eyes) to love John in a corrupt, driven-to-insanity way. She sadly “loves” John more than he loves
Survival may be one of the natural instincts in human beings, but it can and sometimes will be overcome by other powerful emotions. John's initial struggle for survival is suppressed by his overwhelming love for his wife. He becomes involved when his wife's name is mentioned in court, and her life becomes endangered. John does a complete turn around on his perspective of the situation. He goes from being completely isolated, to attempting to take control of the situation. However, his initial failure to do the right thing from the start caused this plan to fail.
This superiority blinds John of what is actually going on with the narrator. He believes she is getting better when she is actually becoming much worse. The story is demonstrating how a woman in a marriage was kept to almost a childish standard. She is
First of all, when the narrator is in her room, she sees the woman behind the wallpaper creeping her during the daytime. This shows that she is unreliable because of her mental health problem. This is one the most important part of the story because the woman that she sees represents herself being trapped in the room. Also, her feelings are not stable. In the beginning, she sees John as a person who takes care of her and loves her. However, the later in the story, the narrator seems to
She has internalized John’s authority to the point that she practically hears his voice in her head, telling her what to think. She cannot help but feel the way she does, and so the move she makes at the end—focusing on the house instead of her situation—marks the beginning of her slide into obsession and madness. John is a symbol of her mental illness because it shows his authority over her and how she thinks she is not loved by anyone especially her husband. “His family has gotten into the habit of putting in his room things for which they could not find any other place, and now there were plenty of these, since one of the rooms in the apartment had
John’s domineering personality is seen throughout the story. He denies her choice of bedrooms at their rented home and “hardly lets me stir without special direction.” (Gilman 845) The most profound example of control is shown with
After a while of staying at the house she started to get lazier and rest most of the time. During the day when John and his sister think that the narrator is resting she is actually study the wallpaper in the room. She is starting to feel uneasy in the room once more and wish that John would take her away from the house but John would not listen and he would say that the house was doing her good. The only way that John would leave is if he believe that she was in any
The narrator of the story is forced into a submissive role because she is confined to her room in the mansion and has all her daily needs supervised by John and their housekeeper. The narrator's mental health is not viewed in a serious manner by John, and the narrator is forced to stay away from all forms of excitement, companionship, and writing. John completely disregards his wife's opinions by not allowing her to do anything that she thinks will do herself good because he believes that he knows better. This could be contributed to the fact that the author lived in a time when women were seen as inferior to
She feels as if John is turning her whole family against her and her emotions. John never listens to anything his wife has to say to him. This is an example of how women feel their opinion or voice never mattered in the 1890’s.
The way Gilman writes John makes me feel as though he’s talking to a child and not his adult wife as he uses these names in abundance. All in all, Gilman’s narrator appears both conscious and ignorant to her situation. There are many passages that have readers believing she loathes John and wants to leave him, but there are just as many that convince otherwise and that she wants this domestic lifestyle. Ideally free of the rest
As the story progresses, we see John is not straight up evil, and cares deeply for his wife but both of them are part of an unequal relationship where the protagonist cannot be taken seriously. There is also a sense of John treating her as an object, patient or someone he is not familiar with rather than someone he is married to. The last line of the story is very powerful, “Now why should that man have fainted? But he did, and right across my path by the wall, so that I had to creep over him every time! “John indirectly destroys her with his “resting cure” treatment which is the last thing he wants as he displays his reaction by what seems as fainting and not waking up (dying but is not clear in the text).
Firstly, John, tends to partially solve his problems, then gravitates towards ignoring them, swiping them under the rug or even running from them. For example, when the narrator asks, "Why the house had stood so long untenanted,” (647) John just laughs at his wife instead of answering her and doesn 't stress her question which proves that he’s just letting it go and isn 't going to do anything about it like he does several times during the text. Not only does John ignore his problems, but he also "scoffs openly at any talk.” (652). This means that he doesn’t want to talk about his problems and he would prefer to keep things bottled up then to express how he is really feeling or what 's going on. John also proves that he chooses to run from the majority of his problems and his most important problem being his wife. The narrator says that he is also always "going into town for more serious cases” (650). This shows that he is avoiding confrontation and is finding excuses in which to deal with his problems. John also avoids his problems literally, by not addressing his wife by her real name and instead by calling her names like "my blessed little goose.” (649), and by saying cute lines like "bless her little heart” (652). These names and lines make it so that he doesn’t have to answer her question honestly because he justified it with something kind distracting her from her original point. As it is clear, John chooses a more demeaning and
It is seen when he says “What is it, little girl?” (Gilman 661) after she wakes him from checking out the wallpaper. Her husband comes off loving and caring to most at first glance. However if you study him you can see it is just to gain ground and easily becomes in control. John has basically taken away her right to make decisions on what is best for her wellbeing.