preview

Comparing Miller And Azurdia's View Of Prayer

Decent Essays

First, Miller’s incitement that we must learn to pray as a child is profoundly encouraging as it brings prayer to common ground, making it simple to grasp. Most of us can relate to how we interact and talk with our fathers (or some father figure). We can remember asking for help, crying out in desperation, saying thank you for good gifts, etc. Miller’s encouragement reminds me of Psalms 131: “O Lord, my heart is not lifted up, my eyes are not raised too high; I do not occupy myself with things too great and too marvelous for me. But I have calmed and quieted my soul, like a weaned child with its mother [italics added]; my soul is like the weaned child that is with me. Israel, hope in the Lord from this time on and forevermore.” Sometimes we can get so hung up praying “theological” …show more content…

Second, as it relates to how Miller’s encouragement to childlike prayer relates to Azurdia’s view that “prayer is not just talking to God”, it would be poorly gathered conclusion to say that Miller’s fundamental point is in opposition Azurdia’s view. Ultimately, Miller speaks to the manner or mindset in which we are to approach God in prayer, while Azurdia address the substance of our prayers. Consider Miller’s words: “Less mature Christians have little need to prayer […] Surprisingly, mature Christians feel less mature on the inside. When they hear Jesus say, ‘Apart from me you can do nothing’ (John 15:5), they nod in agreement […] That’s why strong Christians pray more.” (Miller, 57-59). In this you can quickly see that Miller views prayer much more than mere childlike babbling (cf. Matt.

Get Access