Ahmadsoltani (2009) compares Sa’adi with Whitman. The author believes that purpose of poetry for the two poets was not the same, but they both were successful in dealing with social subjects. Sympathy, justice, prosperity and life are among the common subjects in the two poets.
Payande (2009) compares Whitman's “When I Heared the Learn'd Astronomer” with Sepehri's “Sorah of Watching”. The poets believe that reason is unable to find out the essence of being. Payande pays attention to the similarities rather than the influences, and believes trying to trace influences is useless. The ideas of Sepehri and Whitman are so similar that Stovall's comment on the American poet quoted in the article best fits Sepehri.
Miller (2009) compares Whitman with
…show more content…
The authors believe that the American poet was involved in religion as a subject of his works and that he treated the subject very seriously. Not only was he familiar with Emerson’s works on the oriental poets but also he read some of those poets in translation. The writers try to illustrate the similarities between Whitman’s religious beliefs and Sufism. The three poets’ “egotism” was rooted in their belief in God's omnipresence. Another significant feature that these three poets had in common was employing a secular language to deliver a spiritual message. Unconventional symbolism was still another common …show more content…
“Although Neo-Pragmatist scholars have long considered Walt Whitman an intellectual and literary forebear to William James and the American Pragmatic tradition, James believed Whitman to be a far more problematic thinker than has been acknowledged” (526). Whitman is present in much of James’s writings, and The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902) in particular. That Whitman is “embodiment of a particular kind of metaphysical excess, at once unworldly and effeminate” (526). Examining the writings of the leading gay Whitmanites of his era, James traced Whitman’s influence—both implicitly and explicitly. A “feminine” and “unnatural” Whitman was a chief foil to the father of Pragmatism. James defined “his own ‘manly’ beliefs and methodologies, particularly with respect to religious experience” (525) in contrast to that
On this verse, we can see how Whitman tries to connect to mind, body, spirit and nature. In “Song of Myself” Whitman attempted to change the meaning of American poetry. I described identity issues that pertain to him, but that the audience was able to identify with. Whitman, opened the door to
"WHITMAN WAS MORE MAN THAN YOU'LL EVER BE," said a student of Louisiana State University. When asked questions of your sexual preference or thoughts on the issue of sex, I would venture to say it makes most people uncomfortable. This is an age-old topic that people know about, yet do not want to talk about. He was particularly reticent about his issues regarding sex and his particular sexual preference. In fact, of Whitman's struggles the most difficult for him to deal with was his ever so strong homosexual desires (Hubbell 283). Whether homosexuality is right or wrong is not for me to decide. Though I feel it should not be used so explicitly in works of
After studying American author, Walt Whitman, it is clear that he has had a long lasting impact on society and the lives of authors and artists who came after him. Through works like Democratic Vistas and Song of Myself, Whitman gave American society tools to promote creative expression and the essence of democracy. However, Whitman’s methods had to be adopted over time to touch/bring attention to different social issues. Two authors who were able to branch off of Whitman’s works and ideas were Isadora Duncan and James Baldwin. By analyzing these two important characters of history, we will be able explore two different social issues in two different eras and how Duncan and Baldwin refined Whitman’s approach in order to make a statement in society. It’s significant to identify the importance of these artists because this process is still relevant in today’s society, adapting from Whitman in order to get points across and make a difference.
From the late 1800s to the early 1900s, American poets began to diverge from the classic techniques of writing poetry. Among these poets stood Walt Whitman and Emily Dickinson. Even though Whitman and Dickinson led contrasting lifestyles and had contrasting structures of writing, their meanings that they conveyed through their poems were often related. Whitman’s poem “Song of Myself, No. 6” and Dickinson’s poem “This Quiet Dust Was Gentlemen and Ladies” are models of work that are distant in form, but actually encompass several similarities in subject and tone.
During his time, Walt Whitman was known as the father of free verse. In his work he incorporates his view on the importance of knowledge in the world. Showing different views in his work made it debatable to the audience and having a new outlook on education. He introduced a new way of learning, which is through experience. In this poem, the speaker mentions a time when he was presented a lecture from the wise astronomer, but did not gain the knowledge he needed.
It is obvious today from Whitmanís place in American literature that the "scrupulous circles" did pay some attention to his poetry and identifying with at least portions of it. Dana did contend that, "no impartial reader can fail to be impressed with the vigor and quaint beauty of isolated portions" (3).
Is it conceivable to compare two poets that appear to be uniquely different from each other and compare and contrast their famous pieces of literature? It may be unimaginable to consider that there are similarities between Emily Dickenson’s “I’m Nobody! Who are You?” and Walt Whitman’s “Song of Myslef”, formerly known as Leaves of Grass, but there are definitely similarities. However, it is important to identify the differences between the two poets first .
Romanticism is a beautiful movement that revolutionize the entire world, and it had very important authors such as: Walt Whitman and Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. They had their own writing style which does not require poetic conventions. This movement does not support neoclassicism and an emphasis, and an emphasis on the imagination and emotions. In conclusion, the romanticism age was the beginning for humans to start expressing their feelings, and emotions.
& nbsp;Divinity, Sexuality and the Self in Whitman’s Song of Myself Through his poetry, Whitman's "Song of Myself" makes the soul sensual and makes divine the flesh. In Whitman's time, the dichotomy between the soul and the body had been clearly defined by centuries of Western philosophy and theology. Today, the goodness of the soul and the badness of the flesh still remain a significant notion in contemporary thought. Even Whitman's literary predecessor, Emerson, chose to distinctly differentiate the soul from all nature. Whitman, however, chooses to reevaluate that relationship.
Perhaps, in the following essay I put a quart into a pint pot, because I intend to puzzle out, or rather, find and give a deeper insight into Walt Whitman's sexuality that is still a question on agenda. There are readers and critics who state that it is a shame to humble his poetry to this level, but I think that he was homosexual in his era the topic cannot be left untouched, because therefore this factor was very influential on his everyday life, thinking and hence on his poetry, too.
Today Whitman’s poetry is considered to be of the conservative and traditional variety, but back in 1855, when Leaves of Grass was first published, it was a controversial volume. This poetry broke conventions when it came to basics syntax, rhythm,
Religion requires blindly adhering the traditions of those who came before them. Both Emerson and Whitman reject the idea of Christianity as an institution because of the practice that places God above man. In regard to God, Whitman says “Be not curious about God,For I who am curious about each am not curious about God...I hear and behold God in every object, yet understand God not in the least,Nor do I understand who there can be more wonderful than myself.” The idea that there is something above man prevents one from understanding that divinity comes from within. The belief divine nature encompasses everyone and everything aids an individual in understanding what is right and wrong instinctively from circumstance rather than from a greater being. Both Emerson and Whitman advocate for religion to revolve around man rather than a greater being. It is not that either writer rejects religion as a whole, but disagree with the features that constrain the individual. Emerson says of religion, ‘We but half express ourselves, and are ashamed of that divine idea which each of us represents. It may be safely trusted as proportionate and of good issues, so it be faithfully imparted, but God will not have his work made manifest by cowards. A man is relieved and gay when he has put
While both are famous trailblazers the two are vastly different. Incipiently, both poets Emily Dickinson and poet Walt Whitman were well known poets one is considered to be one of America's greatest and most original poets, taking definition as her provience and challenging the existing definitions of poetry and a poet’s work, Whitman on the other hand was considered to be a latter day successor to Homer, Shakespeare and Dante, creating monumental work through the chatted praises from body to soul, found beauty and ressourance in death. Both poets come from opposite backgrounds, and while they both share inspirational sources, they do so in distinctive ways. Analyzing two seperate poems from Emily Dickinson and Whitman, I will be comparing and contrasting the poems as I go through
“I feel ashamed to go naked about the world” (Whitman). Poetry, for many, is a comfort and a pleasure for the senses. But, for Walt Whitman, it was something much more. Poetry was a channel for his most profound emotions and a mass broadcasting of his entire being. In his beautiful words, he was able not only to convey both misery and elation to the masses, but absolute truth. His Leaves of Grass revealed so much about his persona that it served as, perhaps, one of the most beautifully written American autobiographies. It has been said that a true artist must let himself be vulnerable to the world—allowing for critics and skeptics to take him apart like vultures-- and Whitman published his poems and walked amongst his peers naked for all to see. For him to be a homosexual on top of all of this was an even bigger component of his revealed “shame”, but he revealed it nonetheless. In “I Sing the Body Electric,” “The Sleepers,” and “Song of Myself,” Whitman conveys a personal theme of homosexuality through his imagery of the male physique.
In Walt Whitman’s “Song of Myself”, the poet showcases his feelings of people and himself by using literary descriptors to convey his thoughts on these and various other subjects. In section 20, Whitman’s purpose is to showcase self-assuredness regardless of what the world tries to state otherwise by maintaining his resolute happiness in being himself. This is what sets him apart from being like the other people in the world.