Compare And Contrast Rome And Roman Republic

In any government system there are many failures and accomplishments. In the republic form of government, the state is ruled by the citizen body. These positions aren’t inherited but rather gained through elections by citizens. In a Republic government the head of state in not a monarch. Also, there are many different Republics through time. The Roman and American Republic are similar in many ways. Ways of similarity are the Roman “Struggle of the Orders” and the American civil rights movements, the structure of government, and the roles of women.

The Roman Empire is still known today as one of history’s most powerful period. Rome government had stick rules and policies. The Roman government at this point was known as the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was controlled by the roar Rome. Bureaucracy was ran throughout the region, but Rome did not want this nor could they afford it. However, they did allow small cities to run a lower level of government. The exercise of indirect rule thus became a basic principle of imperial government. The business of local administration and jurisdiction was delegated to the existing communities of city or tribe. This type of structure was deemed to be a weakness to some historians because of the consequences. Consequences that allow a third level government to enforce the emperor’s rules. Because of the expansion of the territory, this was the only reasonable way for it to function normally. The empire was a "commonwealth of cities" which acted as economic and cultural of the Roman world and were integrated into the administrative system as local foci of government. This imperial ruling was first implemented by Rome. It came about because of social trends and not the Roman strategic policies that was often changed by Romanized upper class citizens. These upper classman brought about firmness throughout the land with their strategic and educated planning.

The Roman Republic (509 BCE - 30 BCE), one of the world's first ‘democracies’, was a place where normal people could impact the government’s decisions. It has always been considered a true democracy, but as society delves deeper into the facts, was this really true? During these almost 500 years, the citizens of Rome were allowed some freedoms to impact their own society, but these decisions were not as special to them as was thought. The Roman Republic was only half democratic because of its constitution, the specifics of the Assemblies, and their voting methods.

As Rome became independent from the Etruscan ruling, its government walked away from having a monarch and transformed into a Republic as a way to avoid the tyranny that many times comes with an absolute autocrat. Rigorous precautions were taken from the start in order to keep the power balanced. Moreover, the structure of the government was meant to be resilient to bad judgment. The structure of the Roman Republic with its government and law provided for a more just system.

At its time, the Roman Republic showed great superiority over other civilizations due to advanced technology and an organized government. Systems within the government held this superiority. Voting and passing laws are some of the many great systems in which the Roman Republic created to ensure that the people’s voices could be heard. Through this, many felt the the Roman Republic followed many democratic rules. Although, due to each system's limitations to the people, many also found the Roman Republic to be non democratic.

Some policies and institutions of the Roman Republic were useful to help them succeed in conquering first Italy and then the Mediterranean world. Before of the institution of the republic, the romans were a monarchy since their beginning and they were basically a pastoral people. Rome suffer several changes and improvements under the control of the Etruscan kings. The Etruscan were civilization settled north of Rome in Etruria, and they once had control over almost all the Italic peninsula. The Etruscans influences in Rome were profound, they transformed Rome from a pastoral community to a city (91). The Etruscan built the street and roads that help the development of temples, markets, shops, streets, and houses. They basically brought urbanization to Rome. It is fairly to say that the Rome republic was a fusion between the elements of the Etruscan civilization and the Rome elements. The combination of the different political institutions and policies made the Romans succeed in their conquest territories.

There are many factors that show the differences between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire. With the many differences there are also some similarities between the two governing systems. A obvious difference is the time period the Roman Republic and Roman Empire lasted. A obvious similarity is they both occurred in Rome.

The later Roman Republic and early Roman Empire controlled most of modern day Europe through Northern Africa to Asia Minor. This time of complete dominance over much of the known world propelled Rome into a new era of wealth and prosperity that allowed Romans to look past military expansion. The Roman state now turned towards betterment of society and the “craving for a good education.” Education was seen not only as a tool for the furthering of personal careers, but as a way to improve Rome. Education passed along virtue and the skills necessary to run the Republic and early Empire. This knowledge began in the home, transferring from father to son through the role of fathers as paterfamilias or head of household. Fathers were in charge of ensuring the best possible education for their sons in hope that they would further the ideals and goals of a glorious Rome. Education, through the different steps of the informal Roman education structure and through the influence of the father, furthered the ideal of Roman virtue and ensured generations of virtuous leaders.

The Roman Republic and the Roman Empire both made advancements in the way of life, but both ended with their own conflicts and civil wars. Both kingdoms lasted about the same amount of time making it difficult to distinguish which one was greater. They both show times of great conquest and demolishing civil wars. The two were similar in their expansion of land, language, and resources. At the same time, they were very different with their views on government, religion, and leaders (Compare and Contrast the Roman Republic with the Roman Empire).

The voting system was along tribal lines. There were also tribal assemblies that decided on localized matters within the tribe. These had both rich and poor in them. In this way, although not quite a democracy, more citizens were being heard than in other countries or cities (Wasson 2017, Para. 10-12). This was how the Roman government was set up.

The Greeks and the Romans were two empires with similar goals, but contrasting government control. Within Greece were the Spartans and Athenians, which had two diverse governmental bodies. The Spartans were ruthless and focused on military success, while the Athenians lived off of a democracy and let their people decide what was best for the state. Close by were the Romans, who cared for their people liked the Athenians, but made acquiring land a necessity as to the Spartans. Although the Spartans, Athenians, and Romans were made up of different laws and government, they still kept control over their people for centuries to come.

One similarity from ancient Rome and our government is the Senate. For example a senator is a

Based on the article “Greece and Rome (Differences & Similarities)” it is explained that both the Greeks and Romans have special characteristics that distinguish them, yet they still have numerous attributes in common with one another. These two cultures were formed from different times during history, but despite this, they can be shown to be very alike. In terms of aspects such as terrain and women’s rights, the Greeks and Romans are extremely distinct. Nonetheless, these two Mediterranean countries are similar in ways that may not have been noticed.

It is in the period between 1759 – 1771 that American doctrine is immortalized into written law. Addressing this period and the political thought that was formed will undoubtedly reveal much about the character of a modern nation. Furthermore, the ideas and beliefs of the men that had a large impact on the American young government as it was being formed will also reveal their idealism. Capturing this idealism and tracing it back to its oldest roots it is possible to reveal how the Roman Republic had a substantial influence on the architects of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States of America. This work will uncover the roots of Roman political doctrine and reveal how these ideas were later used in the Declaration

The Roman Republic “from the great expansion led masterful tacticians to the immensely advance government, which our own government is molding today”. The Romans would have had a wonderful future, if not for its many flaws. Early expansion led to the separation of a failing social class. The government corroding like steel in salt water, leaving holes which the rich nobles and people of power enjoyed the rewards that it brought to them. It weakens the government that was so know to be ruled by the people and for them.