preview

Compare And Contrast Nixon And Warren Harding

Decent Essays

In regards to corruption, when Warren Harding is compared to Richard Nixon, one can infer that Nixon’s scandal was worse, but he was a superior leader than Harding because he possessed executive level leadership ability. Although both were likeable, Nixon outshined Harding from a political and ethical standpoint; he was motivated for the job and possessed the credentials that made him qualified for the position. In contrast to Nixon, Harding was unmotivated and ill suited for the presidency, and the only substantial matter that he took care of was a post-war economic recession, which he delegated away to his offices. Nixon, however walked into a war, and despite that he achieved more than Harding. According to White House.gov, “His accomplishments while in office included revenue sharing, the end of …show more content…

A combination of his paranoia and abuse of power earned him the title as one of the worst presidents ever, but it can not be overlooked that he showed initiative during his term. He knew about what was going on within his administration, but because there was a mutual respect between himself and his cabinet made him a better leader in that regard. Harding knew nothing about what was going on in his cabinet because he delegated it all away, and one can conclude that corruption within his cabinet was due to his lack of executive leadership ability. Nixon possessed it, and he also used it in order to create, according to the Miller Center, “Nixon saw opportunities to improve relations with the Soviet Union and establish relations with the People's Republic of China” (UVA 1). The difference between Nixon and Harding was that Nixon had an agenda going into the presidency, Harding did not, and he could not create an agenda because of his neutral take on any political

Get Access