College Athletes Should be Paid

Free Entertainment No college athlete has ever been paid by the NCAA. This does include all sports, not just football. College football players should be paid by the NCAA, just how the NFl pays their players. They are doing the same thing, in front of the same amount of people, for no pay at all.

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) was founded by President Roosevelt in 1905. The college organization was first recognized as a league, the NCAA committed to the idea of not providing athletes’ with a salary who took part in the organization. The NCAA is based off the idea of amateurism, and this was a notable idea at the time. According to U.S. News, the NCAA is no longer compatible to what the league use to be. The NCAA brings around around eleven billion every year for the organization as a whole (“Should NCAA Athletes Be Paid?”). Coaches and administrators make a large sum of money, but the players receive no monetary compensation they seem to be the main focus of college sports, Without the athletes there is no NCAA league.

Almost every week there is some sort of story that makes the news about a university breaking the NCAA rules. The debate is bigger than ever to start paying college athletes to play sports. It does not matter which sport it is, athletes need more than just a scholarship to pay for expenses outside of tuition, room, and board. A scholarship is strictly limited to these, but what about the expenses outside of those? It is time to start paying college athletes to play sports to cover the expenses that occur outside of a scholarship and the sport. With the growing costs of living, more and more athletes are looking for ways to get more money than

One of the most controversial subjects we as individuals hear about this day in age is whether or not college athletes deserve to be paid. Many people argue that these athletes do intact, deserve to be paid for their time and hard work. NCAA athletes create a name for themselves by playing and performing well on their college teams. The better these athletes perform, the more publicity the school revives. This then leads to higher ticket sales and stores around campus selling jerseys and other clothing items with athletes names and numbers on the back. NCAA schools have become comfortable with using athletes’ names to bring in a revenue for the school, and yet the athletes never see any of that money. On the other hand, many people believe that these athletes do not deserve, nor should they expect to receive payment in return. They believe that these scholarships and the education are payment in itself. Some even bring up the question on if it is affordable or even realistic to pay college athletes.

Paying colleges athletes is one of the biggest debates in college sports history. The argument has been around for at least a decade, with people believing in positive effects and negative effects. College athletes have been playing sports without pay since the beginning. It has begun to gain popularity within the last few years due to incidents such as Reggie Bush. He received more than $100,000 in financial aid from the University of Southern California. Paying or giving gifts to players is a violation of NCAA rules. The NCAA is an organization that is in charge of college sports in the United States. The idea of paying college athletes has its pros and cons. Some people believe the pros outweigh the cons, but some people think different.

Here is a number for you, $814 million. That is the average amount of revenue the National Collegiate Athletic Association currently makes per year (Gerencer). How much are the NCAA athletes compensated for their hard work, sacrifices, and effort? That 's right, $0. NCAA events such as March Madness and the Football Championship Series (the college national championship), attract massive crowds, national TV coverage, and sold out venues. When is an athletic scholarship no longer enough to support and reward the athletes? Because division 1 athletics attract new students, excite alumni, and earn revenue for their schools and coaches, all without being able to secure a job, therefore, the athletes should be paid.

For year’s people, athletes, college directors, and even the fans have always had different opinions on whether or not that the NCAA should pay the college athletes. Many people think that most of the athletes put in as much time for it to be considered a full time job so that they deserved to be payed, but others think different. Other people think people think college athletes shouldn’t be paid since they are supposed to be students while in school and not employees until they reach the professional level. No matter what people think college sports are watched by millions of people and are entertaining to watch and if the athletes are getting paid or not, it shouldn’t take the entertainment and passion that everyone has for each sport. Many people think that college athletes deserve to be paid with all the time they put in into practices, workouts, and traveling for away games while still going to school, up to 60 hours a week, and maintaining the grades they need to have to be able to play.

College Athletes Why are professional athletes paid, but collegiate athletes are not? If they get paid, then collegiate athletes should get paid for playing the sport that they play too. Reasons being that if the athlete goes professional in his or her sport they will end up getting paid anyways. Also the National Collegiate Athletic Association or NCAA makes millions off of these players, and they get nothing. However, some people say that education should be the number one priority of a school.

In the recent past, college athletics has gained massive fame in the United States. The immense fame of the college athletics has developed over the past twenty years. The massive development and fame of the college athletics have resulted in improved incomes for the National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA). Due to increased revenue received by the NCAA, the participates in athletics in the colleges has fuelled the argument of whether the college athletes need to be paid and rewarded more than just the athletic scholarships. In this research paper, I will take a stab at to respond the question whether they should be paid by delving the explanations for and against the payment of the college athletes (Adams and Becky 108).

Over the last few years there has been renewed controversy about whether college athletes should be paid. The idea of paying college athletes goes back to the early 1900s with one of the first inter collegiate competitions between Harvard and Yale. The modern position of the National Collegiate Athletic Association is that athletic scholarships provide a free college education in return for participating on the university team. Many college athletes dedicate more than forty hours of training per week. College is expensive. How can we expect college athletes to pay for books and other basic necessities if they are busy practicing or participating in home games or traveling to away games? The NCAA needs to start paying these athletes to supplement

Paying student athletes has become a growing disputation among college athletes in recent years. College athletes have gained immense popularity among Americans over the past few decades. This has resulted into increased revenues for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and its participating colleges. This often fuels the ongoing debate of whether college athletes should be compensated beyond their athletic scholarships. Because of the amount of income student athletes bring into schools, student athletes should be paid based on the amount of success, revenue, and popularity they bring to the school.

The first president of the NCAA, Walter Byers, once stated, “All of this is not fair, and I predict that the amateur code now based on a forgone philosophy and held in place for shear economic purposes, will not long stand the test of the law” (Schooled-The Price of College Sports). So why has it? This controversial issue on whether college athletes should be compensated or not has been debated for years, but still has not been resolved. Although the highly disputed debate on whether to pay college athletes or not is very intricate, evidence clearly shows they should be further compensated.

College athletes are taken advantage of and deserve to be compensated for their services while playing sports. These students are exploited and used to make money and out of everything that particular school makes, the athlete never given a penny of it. All of the hard works, blood, sweat and tears that they put into that

Looking into this controversial issue is a difficult matter. There are so many different aspects related to the payment of college athletes. In researching this matter, one has to first look into the history of this subject such as the evolution of college sports, the issues surrounding scholarships and payment, and the modern industry that has been created by the media and NCAA. Understanding how much a college athlete does is also very important. One must look into how much a student-athlete is actually treated as a student. Second, the money, revenue, and scholarship aid need to be evaluated. The revenue generated, the money paid to coaches and others, and the extensive broadcasting contracts are important when considering if players should be paid. Lastly, in order to come up with some type of system of payment, one must crunch the numbers in order to find a proper way in which to pay these deserving athletes.

Should college athletes receive pay for what they do? You’ve probably seen this pop-up a million times, and thought about it. You’ve probably figured why should they? Aren’t they already receiving benefits from a full-ride scholarship? But then an athlete will get caught up in a scandal like Johnny Manziel, where he signed footballs for money.. then you think well why shouldn’t he receive that money? And you then contradict yourself. But shouldn’t they receive money from outside sources, and then the benefits from the school. Not get a salary from the school just the benefits they’re already receiving, and money from sponsors. Wouldn’t that make sense considering the money they’re making the school? According to an ESPN report Alabama