College Athletes Should Be Paid

The opponents of paying athletes also believe that paying student-athletes will force schools to cut certain programs, or the schools won’t even be able to pay at all. Most people in our world have to pay for college, while these few and rare individuals get to go to expensive places for free. “These athletes… full tuition paid for, or at least significantly discounted. Billions are given to athletes each year… the average athletic scholarship at a school actually exceeds the school’s tuition…. consider Ohio State…

For years the question or topic of paying college athletes has been given much debate. Countless studies show that this idea has many negative factors associated with it, which in-return make it unreasonable. The cons associated with the idea of paying college/amateur athletes include that many student-athletes already receive scholarships and other benefits, paying college athletes could detract from the purity of the game, and the process of figuring out how to pay these athletes would be extremely difficult. Based upon many studies the idea has more consequential cons that outweigh the potential pros.

The NCAA and the universities represented by it are now making more money than ever through their athletic programs than ever before. However, due to amateurism regulations set by the NCAA, the college athletes that generate the massive revenue the NCAA receives are not paid at all. The article opens with the argument that college athletes should be paid for their play. The argument is supported through information proving that the NCAA undervalues athletes through the money they generate for their school versus the amount of scholarship money the school provides them with. The article also discusses how the NCAA also prevents athletes from marketing their own image and

One of the most popular pastimes in America is watching college sports. Whether it’s football, baseball, or basketball, these student-athletes bring fans, money, and sponsorships to their schools. So why shouldn't these athletes be paid? The answer is that student-athletes should not be paid, because they have the ability to earn scholarships or financial aid, college athletes are paid in other ways than financially, and not all schools have the money to pay them. Ultimately, paying college athletes would ruin the current culture and competitiveness of college sports.

One of the most controversial subjects we as individuals hear about this day in age is whether or not college athletes deserve to be paid. Many people argue that these athletes do intact, deserve to be paid for their time and hard work. NCAA athletes create a name for themselves by playing and performing well on their college teams. The better these athletes perform, the more publicity the school revives. This then leads to higher ticket sales and stores around campus selling jerseys and other clothing items with athletes names and numbers on the back. NCAA schools have become comfortable with using athletes’ names to bring in a revenue for the school, and yet the athletes never see any of that money. On the other hand, many people believe that these athletes do not deserve, nor should they expect to receive payment in return. They believe that these scholarships and the education are payment in itself. Some even bring up the question on if it is affordable or even realistic to pay college athletes.

College sports has become extremely popular over the past few years. With the March Madness tournament held in March and the new College Football Playoff held in January, the NCAA has achieved a great deal of attention and high television ratings. Although colleges make tons of money off of their athletes, college athletes receive plenty of compensation. Paying student athletes would cross the line between professionalism and amateurism and would violate the essence of being a student athlete.

In the recent past, college athletics has gained massive fame in the United States. The immense fame of the college athletics has developed over the past twenty years. The massive development and fame of the college athletics have resulted in improved incomes for the National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA). Due to increased revenue received by the NCAA, the participates in athletics in the colleges has fuelled the argument of whether the college athletes need to be paid and rewarded more than just the athletic scholarships. In this research paper, I will take a stab at to respond the question whether they should be paid by delving the explanations for and against the payment of the college athletes (Adams and Becky 108).

The NCAA has had debates before of whether or not they believe college athletes should get paid because often most of the students have been or are covered with scholarships that cover fees, meal plans and their tuition. Even though the

One of the biggest questions concerning college sports is not about who has the best recruiting class, or where the best coach is headed after their contract ends. The biggest question in NCAA sports is whether collegiant athletes should be paid by their university or not. College athletes have never been legally paid, and that needs to come to an end. NCAA athletes give us outstanding performances, creating memories and leaving their names in a historical manner. Yet, at the same time they are barely able to make it by day to day.

While not all student athletes are on scholarship, many are; particularly those who are playing for schools we see winning national championships. In addition to free tuition and room and board, these college athletes also often receive help towards books and other basic needs. This money does not have to be paid back. Most other students are not receiving these benefits, and will come out of school with a great big student loan debt. Student athletes already have it easier, financially, than most of the students at their school. That’s why some people answer the question “Should student athletes be paid?” with a firm no.

Traditionally, a professional athlete’s main focus is to make money and provide for that individual and their family. If student-athletes were to be paid, they would not have to go professional to make money and could gain a better education by remaining in school. When referring to a student who takes part in athletics, the most commonly used phrase is “student athlete”. The American people who follow college sports tend to place more emphasis on the word athlete and less emphasis on the word student. Even though being a student is of great importance, college athletes generate millions of dollars for their prospective universities annually. Being a student is difficult enough and most college athletes do not have the time to devote

I think that college athletes are already getting paid by receiving the sports scholarships. If they get to the NFL or the NBA, then they can get paid, but while they are in college, they should not get paid. The opponents claim is that college athletes should get paid what they are worth. In addition, they don’t believe that a sports scholarship is a good enough pay.

Collegiate sports have been a huge American pastime. Since the beginning of college level sports people have debated if college athletes should paid. College athletes should be paid because there sport requires them to work year round, therefore they do not have time to get money from a normal job. Also the hardwork and dedication it takes to be a college athlete should be rewarded because not a lot of people can go that far in their career. While it may be true that college sports are run through a school however the school gets money from these events and put elsewhere.

Some people would say that a person who works fifty to sixty hours a week without pay is being taken advantage of. For example, think of college athletes, and the labor they assert for no pay. College athletes spend massive amounts of time to dedicate themselves to their sport and their studies. They help the NCAA earn exuberant amounts of money, but see little in return. The only benefit college athletes receive today is scholarships, which sometimes do not even cover full-tuition or meal plans. In the opinion of former Ohio State cornerback Bradley Roby and many other players, a scholarship is not enough (Briggs). Players are often forced to struggle through college by taking out loans to pay for expenses that are not covered by their

Is an athletic scholarship really enough of a “payment” to reimburse athletes for the billions of dollars made by the NCAA every year? This issue of paying collegiate athletes, especially football and basketball players, has been around for many years. Athletes, students, bystanders, and NCAA analysts and authority figures have a strong opinion about paying college athletes. Whether college athletes should be paid or not is a debate topic that is more prevalent today than ever.