Cnn, Foxnews, Msnbc Comparison Essay

Paragraph 4: the strengths and the weakness to the media outlet. CNN news and History Channel both provide informations and facts but they both take out little pieces of informations. CNN news may not be true to other media sources because media like ABC news and Chicago news other media sources may have the same details. History channel will give the time of the 9/11 attack and the day it happened and the place it was took at. History channel sometimes may not give you all the details and more informations.

The website CNN helps inform people with the top bullet points such as sports , politics, and world affairs. The sports helps inform people what is going on with sports like what happened in a game, and like if there is a type of trade in baseball, or basketball. The reason why CNN helps to inform people is because it keeps observers up to date on specific topics and information located inside these bullet

Approximately 57% of Americans get their daily news by watching some kind of nightly news on their televisions, while the internet is not far behind at at 38% (Mitchell 2016). Being a nation of conglomerate monopolies the United States has three major news stations that control a majority of the viewership, CNN, MSNBC, and Fox Television. “The big three”, as they’re know, compete every day for the highest ratings by desperately pulling and keeping in as many viewers as possible, while providing vastly different agenda backed content. Public Broadcasting Service, PBS, draws in a much smaller crowd and with it has a significantly lower budget for stories. While companies like CNN and FOX are able to spend tens of millions of dollars on 24/7

1.) Asa Don Brown, the author of “Desensitization of Terrorism,” focuses on how the influence of the media and social media have desensitized us when it comes to terrorist attacks. Brown directs the article toward an audience who questions why they are no longer as surprised by terrorist attacks when they occur as they used to be. This seems like an extremely odd feeling to have when several people are killed and hundreds are hurt, however, it is the strange reality these days. Terrorist attacks have been happening for years and years now and while we would love to just stop them from occurring, this is blatantly impossible to achieve. He emphasizes in the article, the idea that when terrorist attacks and the terrorists themselves are

Today it seems almost impossible to get a straightforward answer on any major topic from the media. All sources of media have a specific audience that they are intending to hear or view the information that they have prepared, therefore they will cut bits and pieces out so that only the message they are trying to get across will be received. So indeed there is a media bias, and yes it more often than not slants towards the liberal view point, as many reporters and journalists have liberal views themselves.

In the news article, the author's claim is the violent bombings were horrific and tragic for the black community. The first way we were shown this is by all of the amazing vocabulary used in the article. The reporter used words such as” glass that flew out” and “blast crushed two nearby cars like toys”. When the author uses powerful phrases like that you tend to paint the picture of the event a lot easier. The next thing the reporter did to make us believe they thought the bombing an event, is by using quotes like this one said by MLK, "symbol of hardcore resistance to integration." To me hearing powerful people talking about the horrific catastrophe, makes me believe it was really a terrible thing. The last thing the reporter does to

9/11 accomplishment is not how many people they had killed, but is terrifying people through all the reports and images of the attacks and changing the way many people throughout the world live (Philip M Seib and Dana M. Janbekb,2011). People have the right to know what is happening in this world. Journalists have the responsibility to explain so that the news consumers would be able to build their understanding of issues. However, if the news coverage about terrorist acts take up too much space, people’s fear will be promoted. This might scare people away from certain activities, such as using public transports, traveling by air, and traveling to certain countries in Middle East.

The media is one of the most common ways to get information. People can log on to a news website, they can obtain information through mobile online articles, and can watch the nightly news channel on various stations to learn about what is going on in their local city and in the world as a whole. There are dozens of news stations that people can obtain their information, such as CNN, Fox News, CBS News, and the local news station. However, the place in which these individuals obtain their information might not always be the most effective, most factual and accurate, or the most

Whether it is through a newspaper, television, magazines or talk radio, people will always communicate through some type of medium. Now, whether or not the mediums are tainted with bias is a question of beliefs. Some people argue that journalism today is rather fair and balanced, while others would vehemently oppose that view by saying that bias is definitely prevalent in news media and other mediums today. In some instances, there lies the belief that the fairness doctrine should be reestablished in order to mend the problem of bias; however, many would strenuously fight that by arguing that such an act would destroy the freedom of the press guaranteed under the first amendment. Another argument surrounding this issue is the expectation

The CNN Effect has been described in many positive and negative ways. Former UN Security General Boutros-Ghali described CNN as “the sixteenth member of the Security Council (Gilboa, 2005).” While Colin Powell saw the network’s effect as being that “live television coverage doesn’t change the policy, but it does create the environment in which policy is made (Gilboa, 2005).” These two statements show that the CNN Effect has an impact both domestically and internationally as a major part of the world’s political process. The CNN Effect may be seen as a positive or a negative but despite one’s opinion it has had the varying effects of being part of the agenda setting process and acting as an accelerant. Although the CNN Effect,

On the 3rd of February 1998, a U.S. military jet sliced the wire of a

The last article comes from a news agency from the United States, called the Arizona Daily Star. As mention earlier, the only two articles the reported the death of the US soldier just a week before the bombing in Afghanistan were the Toronto Star and the Arizona Daily Star. The article published by the Arizona Daily Star tries to grab on the emotions of Americans back home by mentioning the death of the soldier and giving a specific description stating, "a U.S. Army Special Forces soldier, Staff Sgt. Mark R. De Alencar, 37, of Edgewood, Maryland was killed in action in Nangarhar" (Arizona Daily Star, April 14, 2017). The soldier killed touches all of us back home and just makes us think the dangers that American soldier put themselves through. The article mentioned that there have been "heavy fighting" in the area between the Afghan military and IS fighters (Arizona Daily Star, April 14, 2017). I feel the article gave details of the prior fighting because it serves as a good reason to justify why the bombing was necessary. It gives the impression that more American and Afghan lives were saved by avoiding going in directly and engaging Islamic State militants in the area where there is an "estimate of 600 to 800 IS fighters"(Arizona Daily Star, April 14, 2017). The articles goes to support the decision of the bombing by

“If the media were not there to report terrorist acts and to explain their political and social significance...terrorism as such would cease to exist” said John O'Sullivan, an editor of the Times of London.1 This is also the way many other people feel about the recent increase in terrorist activity; they feel that the media is causing it. The media is doing this by fulfilling the terrorists' need for publicity.2 Terrorists need media publicity in order to get their views spread to the public.3 Because of this need for publicity, terrorists are committing their acts of terrorism in areas where a lot of publicity will be gained; the United States and Western Europe are the most recent targets. The bombings of the federal building in

Attacks receive more coverage when they harm or kill victims, involve hijackings or aircraft, have known perpetrators, and select targets associated with Western countries. A study of transnational terrorism shows that attacks that inflict injuries are twice as likely to attract media attention as those that do not. The attacks in which the perpetrator can be identified are four times as likely to be reported in a newspaper and ten times as likely to be reported on television (The Media’s Role in International Terrorsim). Attacks in the Middle East or Europe are twice as likely to receive media attention as attacks perpetrated in Latin America (The Media’s Role in International Terrorism). There are very similar factors that influence media coverage of attacks that take place within the United States.

Thousands of our nation's men and women were fighting for their country, yet the media limited the amount of information that they chose to pass on to the public. Each day the media is faced with the choice of making decisions of what news to pass on, when that news could make a significant difference in someone's life, or in the fate of our nation.