Classroom Enviorment Analysis

While extremely talented, Raven can definitely be killed as most people can. Shoot her in a way that she can't heal from and she's dead. Stab her and she can bleed. Her healing factor as advanced as others so it does take her some time to recover from near fatal wounds but not nearly as long as most people and it does cause a strain on her body. She also can't control her morphing ability when she is distracted or in a tremendous amount of pain. Knock her unconscious and her true form will reappear, a form she keeps as hidden as possible.

The topic that immediately came to mind that weighs on my heart frequently as an educator is standardized testing. Many refer to standardized tests as “High-stakes testing”. Unfortunately, these high-stakes tests turn the classroom into a preparation center rather than offering well-rounded instruction that the students deserve. My opinion on standardized tests is that they should be eliminated altogether. The tests cannot not determine how “smart” a student is by asking a couple hundred questions, then timing the students, and finally putting students in an environment they are not used to.

This idea of teaching to the test is a complete waste of educational time, that is spent preparing students for this extremely important test, that could be time going into learning things that will prepare students for college and life after college. The reason teachers do this is because they are under such pressure from the school districts to have good scores on these tests, due to the increase in funding to schools that do well and the lack in funding to schools that do poorly, that they can only find the time to prepare for these standardized tests instead of “teaching students skills that go beyond the tests”

There is no evidence that support that teachers will be more motivated to improve student learning if they were evaluated for increase test scores but by basing teacher evaluations on inadequate standardized tests is a recipe for flawed evaluations. The problem with standardized testing is that they are narrow and have limited indicators of student learning. These standardized tests leave out a wide range of important knowledge and skills.

To wake up the dead somepeople wear shells and dance so that the shells made a noise, some people also dress as the diseased.

Ever since then standardized testing has been a huge part of education. Teachers across the nation had to teach to the curriculum instead of what they thought the students needed to learn. Nowadays colleges strictly look at ACT and SAT scores rather than classroom grades, because they believe that some teachers grade on a curve and are not giving the students a fair chance. Standardized tests are an unreliable measure of student performance. A 2001 study published by the Brookings Institution found that 50-80% of year-over-year tests core improvements were temporary and “caused by fluctuations that had nothing to do with long-term changes in learning…”(“Standardized Tests”). Teachers are stressed over if they are teaching “correctly”. They went to a 4-year college, some even more, to get a degree in something that they wanted to do, either for themselves or for the children, and now they have to “teach to the test”. Tests can only measure a portion of the goals of education. A pschometrician, Daniel Koretz says, “standardized tests usually do not provide a direct and complete measure of educational achievement.”(Harris, Harris, and Smith).

Standardized testing has become more common in recent years. Test such as CMAS, PSAT, and ACT Aspire, ACT, SAT, and previously TCAP tests were required to be taken in each school. On occasion you are allowed to opt out of these tests, but in most cases everyone has to take these tests. In this new world of testing a new type of teaching has been implemented, even if it wasn’t meant to happen. Teachers

One problem associated with standardized testing involves teachers “teaching to the test (Standardized Tests).” Nowadays, standardized testing is sometimes seen as a reflection of a teacher’s teaching capabilities. This creates a problem for teachers when their salary or job security is potentially tied to their students’ test scores. Even entire schools can lose funding if their students are not testing high enough or making progress. On the student side, teachers teaching to the test can mean a lot of monotonous drilling and focus on nothing other than what they will be tested on. All of this time spent drilling pushes aside any other potential learning strategies while leaving little room for creativity. When students are not able to spread their wings and express their creativity, both dissent and originality are definitely smothered. In his essay, Gatto claims that both the students and teachers are bored in the classroom (Gatto 608). I believe that this “teaching to the test” way of doing things can be to blame for this dissatisfaction among the public school

Standardized testing is an unfair assessment of teachers in America. Every year, teachers have to hand out standardized tests to their students. These tests measure how well a teacher is teaching his students, and if he successful or not. This is unfair because there will always be a few students in every class that do not try very hard because they do not like school. This hurts the teachers’ scores when they receive their evaluations, and because of this, we feel that there should be an alternative solution to assessing the success of teachers.

As a teacher, and a parent of a special needs child, I feel that all children, regardless of their disability should be educated in the general education classroom as much as possible. Being in the general education classroom benefits not only the special needs student, but other students as well. As stated in the textbook, “The role of the LRE rule is to increase academic and other kinds of inclusion because inclusion benefits not only the student with a disability but also peers who do not have disabilities”, (Brown, 2011, p. 40). Personally, my child has participate in both special education pull out resources and in the general education classroom. My child seems to do better socially and academically when she is involved in the general

Recently I visited the Careerline Tech Center, located in Holland, MI, for an open house on the courses that they offered there for juniors and seniors. One course that caught my attention was the Teacher’s Academy class taught there. The high school students who enrolled in this course gave younger students the opportunity to have control over their learning and testing experience, which is unlike anything that I have ever experienced. These younger students were able to take tests in a variety of ways, which allowed them to reflect what they knew more accurately and share their knowledge of a topic better than they could on a standardized test. Since then, I have asked myself, “what would the impact be if all schools switched over to a system of teaching kids and testing them using their individual learning style(s)? I believe that switching to this system would help all students

Once all of the children are done washing their hands, some of them bring over comfy chairs to help set up for the movie. The TV stand is on wheels and is a bit messy having a PlayStation for a movie player instead of a DVD player, which causes many wires to be hanging down. They also have to use a game controller instead of remote, causing more unnecessary wires. The movies are placed in a basket on the stand in easy reach of all of the children.

Standardized tests take away from a teacher’s flexibility and creativity. With that in mind, teachers do not fit into the same mold either. Each teacher has their own style of teaching and should be given the flexibility to teach in a way that will inspire their students. Teachers are not able to be as creative in their teaching styles, when focused on test preparation. Many talented teachers leave the field of education when they lose the freedom to teach their own way. Teaching has gone from a creative art to a structured implementation as the focus shifts to standardized tests.

The students today learning to better themselves will someday become the leaders making decisions to better the lives of the students of the next generation, and this process will continue. Having said that, a test that only gives two-hour interval testing math, reading and writing could not possibly measure how much of a leader a certain student has the potential to be or the creativity of another student; the answer is that these tests do no such thing. “The problem ... is that American schools have made student assessment an either/or proposition. Teacher observations have become increasingly irrelevant as districts and states try to meet the testing targets set by the No Child Left Behind

However, the implementation of standardized tests overall is flawed because as test that are not supposed to take up student’s study or homework time, they often still do since the teacher’s value how the school’s performance will reflect on them. Hence, why I believe that standardized tests should be abolished or at the very least reformed. First off, these tests should not determine federal funds for schools or effect graduation as I experienced which will hopefully prevent teachers and schools from feeling the need to put more pressure on student’s and assure that their lessons will not revolve around what is on the test. Standardized tests should also be given more than once over the course of a school year to give a more accurate evaluation on students and show their progress over the year which might also provide better evaluations for teachers. If changes like these are made, I really believe that it would be a win for both you and students across America as these tests will give better evaluations on what you want to know and help bridge the gap how students in lower grade levels are taught versus how they will be taught in higher education