When it comes to the issue of determining if a resource contains valuable information, there is often a list of criteria that the reader has in order to decide if the information is worthwhile. Such prominent examples include how recently was the document posted, what are the credentials of the author, and the logic that is used during the presentation of the content. This basic premise also persists when it comes to making examinations of whether or not information on websites should be as legitimate and trustworthy. However, one website that goes above and beyond such criteria is that of the Mayo Clinic and in particular their page on the occurrence of ADHD in children. Ultimately the Mayo Clinic's page on ADHD uses the criteria of …show more content…
When it comes to giving an evaluation of the Mayo Clinic's work on ADHD in children, it is vital to also give consideration to the factors of currency, logic, and authority. Currency with respects to evaluation is the question as to when the source in question was either published or posted. The impact of the currency depends on the actual content and also to a large extent on what the reader's intentions are with respects to consuming the content in question. For example using a CDC report on heart disease from 1970 would be wise if the reader intended to incorporate such information into a paper that discusses the evolution in the medical community on heart disease. However, the same report would also be a terrible source of the reader sought to instead use it in a paper discussing the effectiveness of heart disease prevention as the data is too old to be reliable due to the advancements of medical knowledge. Next to be considered is the logic that is used within the material in terms of the claims and proposals that the author makes. The central point in this regards is to simply examine where the basis for such claims are made since the reliability of the writing depends on being based on sound logic. Strong logical writing will base such persuasion in solid facts and data with a high degree of objectivity rather than using dubious
ADHD is a very common neurodevelopment disorder of childhood. It is usually diagnosed in late childhood, around the age of seven by the teachers. The symptoms are typical during ages 3-6 and if not treated properly becomes chronic and persists even after entering adulthood. Children with ADHD may have trouble paying attention, staying organized and controlling impulsive behaviors. It is very difficult to diagnose and when undiagnosed the children can grow to be mislabeled as trouble makers in their adulthood.
The CDC’s use of appeal to logos was done efficiently. The CDC used facts and appealed to reason throughout their discussion on ADHD. The use of facts and
Use of ethos is imperative in any presentation since the target audience is not easily persuaded unless they have trust in one or an organization. The article assumes an authoritative tone, and this makes most readers believe that the information on ADHD as provided by CDC is credible. Readers are convinced of the credibility of the article since the CDC is the main entity in America dealing with developmental disorders, and therefore, they are deemed credible for reporting such issues (Roberts et al. 2010). Furthermore, the organization is accredited by the government, and this helps the target audience to trust the organization as a viable source of such
The core purpose of the CDC Website about Attention-Deficit/Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD) is to educate the public generally and then specifically to inform parents of children that might be suffering from ADHD. There are many unanswered questions about ADHD, and the CDC attempts to dispel some of the myths about the cause, diagnosis, and treatment of the disorder. They present highly logical information through the use of statistics and state by state comparisons. Additionally, there are a few appeals to one’s emotions, suggesting that parental negligence is not the cause of the disorder. Although the dry, mundane tone detracts from the appeal of the website, the inferential
Children with ASD sometimes present aggressive behavior, self-injurious behavior and tantrums that impede their ability to learn in an educational environment (home school). Sometimes medicine is used in an effort to calm the child to the point where they are able to learn in an educational environment. It is recommended that behavior therapy be considered as the first course of action. Doctors recommended Risperdal for Marginee` inability to relax. Risperdal is also used for treatment of irritability in children with ASD. For example, children that struggle with aggression, melt downs (tantrums) and self- injury. Though Marginee` did not take any other medications, there are other medication available to children with autism. For example, Zyprexa, which is used for treatment of aggression and serious behavioral, Prozac and Zoloft, are used for treatment in depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder. All medicines have to be monitored due to various side effects.
doctors prior to making the decision of whether or not to medicate their ADHD children. Capaccio, George. ADD and ADHD. Tarrytown,
There has been so much controversy around the diagnosis of ADHD. There is also a big debate about whether a child has a disorder or not. There is also a huge controversy over whether a parent should give their child the medication that a doctor prescribes for the disorder. Once parents finally decide to place their child on the medicine. They are making the decision that they feel is the best option for their child. Other parents may decide that other treatment options may be better to begin with to see if they cannot fix the problem therapeutically instead. Parents that decide that medicine is the best route may feel that their child would benefit from it, and that benefits outweigh the risks. Whereas to parents that decide otherwise; feel that their child is not that severe with the ADHD, and can handle trying other ways to deal
Foster child, Annalisa Carrion, was replaced from the non-kinship therapeutic foster home of Carmen Arvelo and Miguel Quiles (Ms. Arvelo’s husband) on June 22nd, 2015. A report was received on June 26th, 2015 with the allegation of laceration, bruises, welts, and inadequate guardianship regarding Annalisa Carrion against Miguel Quiles.
This review was conducted on the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Health Center page developed by WebMD.com. The page will be evaluated on how practical and beneficial the webpage is on passing knowledge to its readers. This will be done by looking to see how well the site’s coverage of ADHD is, whether or not the information is really useful and current, and what the site’s objectives seem to be.
The topic of today is Attention deficit hyperactive disorder also known as ADHD. When individuals research this topic there are an array of sources to choose from. One way is by the use of the internet which provides individuals with the needed resources. However, not all resources are created equal. The resources that are provided may be complex and without a certain level of medical understanding, an individual may not
1. A. Please describe the cause of ADHD and how that might be compatible with a medication intervention?
The CDC, in this case, has creditability and trustworthiness because they are a government agency. Because it is an American Government agency the written text is able to convince the readers in believing the details of ADHD, and the course of treatment. Readers often notice if the writer has the proper credibility and knowledge of the subject. Ethos is the main aspect, and how the rest of the writing will be viewed. The clear use of Pathos is
My oldest nephew was diagnosed with ADHD at the age of eight and as he was growing up, it was really tough to understand and control him. He would be very impulsive, disobedient and would constantly pace around the house along with periods of hyperactivity. When he would get his report card sent home, some of his teachers would write a note saying that he constantly called out in class without raising his hand, shake his legs uncontrollably, got out of his seat to walk around or disrupt the other kids and have such short attention span. The thing about all of those disturbances, he maintained very good grades and is a very smart kid. As he got older, he began to learn about the triggers and where his ADHD would kick in and he’s doing great now; he’ll still have his moments where the ADHD will kick in, but it is much better present day. And he was never administered medication or therapy; he learned how to push the urges away but allow them to come out when the surroundings were not overwhelming.
The increase of ADHD diagnosis has raised many concerns among doctors in the United States. In 2013, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported new data that showed the number of children diagnosed with ADHD grew by 22 percent in a four-year period Brown University, (2013). The information from the Center for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) raised questions and concerns about the growth of ADHD diagnosis. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also stated that the percentage of children with a diagnosis of ADHD continue to increase in the United States. This information was provided by the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) to inform the public and raise awareness for ADHD. Researching the growth of
The diagnostic manuals can also help clinicians with accuracy if the manuals include another criterion – delirium. Those with ADHD do not suffer from delirium, only if they are comorbid. Referring to Morton (1999) again, though he is referencing the DSM-IV, there is still much relevance, he describes delirium as a “potentially fatal syndrome marked by severe, fluctuating confusion and autonomic nervous system instability” as the result of “Changes in dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin levels” which can also “be accompanied by psychotic symptoms” (pg. 111). It was suggested that clinicians use “nonaddictive, psychopharmacologic treatments for comorbid and secondary psychiatric disorders” (pg. 112).