Charter Schools Vs. School Schools

Public education has had a negative effect on students; it’s often because of the bigger class sizes, poor test scores, and high crime in the surrounding areas. Public schools need to revise their system to determine what’s the best fit for their student’s educational needs. All children who live in a school district have a right to attend a district school. Many parents would like more options and opportunities for their child, and would like to be involved in their child’s education. Charter schools are part of the answer for a better educational choice for children’s academic achievement. Charter schools have many successful methods and continue to pave the way for children’s education needs .

Charter schools are an alternative to public schools. Whether this alternative is a better solution to the public schools is the argument. Public schools can be just as creative as charter schools. Public schools are funded by our tax dollars, which ultimately the United States Government decides where those funds go. Education should be the last thing to be cut in the budget, but unfortunately, we the people do not have a choice other than the public offices whom we hope will do what they have said in their election speeches. Charter schools have come about to fill the gap that public schools cannot fill. They can gear their curriculum to student needs, where some public schools cannot because of funding cuts.

Charter schools are all the buzz in the media lately; they are what seems to be the sensible response to the path traditional public schools are heading, down the drain. However, charter schools still face many obstacles and issues, stemming from the fact that they are far less regulated than their public school counterparts. This enacts issues including lack of quality control, increased segregation, and severe misuse of funds. Likewise, charter schools are only going to become increasingly more competitive and higher quality if their closest competitors follow that path, meaning the most successful charters are the ones compared directly to private schools. Since charters are also attempting to make a profit, they will go to all extents, including discrimination to bring up the scores, and therefore gain more leverage in negotiating for more funds. Simply enough, the most logical and simple way to prevent charter schools from degrading in quality or becoming out of control is to put more regulation on them, while still allowing them to maintain many characteristics of an independent charter.

America’s education is failing, and serious reform is needed. The topic of education has been in the forefront over the last few decades. Many, including politicians have attempted to tackle what seemed to be a hopeless situation. With all the corruption and bureaucracy within the system, it is unlikely that this problem will be resolved anytime soon. However, there is hope amidst all this, and that is charter schools. Charter schools impact education by having passionate teachers who truly care for their students’ well-being, use up-to-date school methodology, are able to function with less bureaucracy, and have accountability that results in less corruption, and increased cost efficiency.

Extending on the main claim that charter schools are the best schools is David and Jack Cahns’ book, When Millennials Rule: The Reshaping of America. In their chapter “Better Schools: Investing in our future,” they are trying to enlighten political campaign organizers about the millennials’ future actions and beliefs. David and Jack Cahn are millennial activists and journalists whose book was publicized by Post Hills Press in 2014. Their whole book covers present day events like running presidents and problems with debt, school reform, and the controversy on legalizing of Marijuana. Just recently some of theses events changed from present to

As of 2017, 43 states including the District of Columbia now have charter schools. Today, the debate continues on which one is better, charter schools or traditional public schools. Despite the critics and those against charter schools, and whether the performance match the hype of the modern rival public schools. The question is what is the most effective way to educate our children and prepare them for the future? The answer to that question is a choice.

For nearly a decades, charter schools have become the modern rival of public schools, but does the charter schools is the best? In modern society, people keep chasing the American dream; they want to achieve better life quality and higher education. As most people believe, education is a primarily way to train children all the skills which will need as adults to find good jobs and live well, but the nation have many different types of schools, such as private schools, charter schools, home schools, or traditional public schools. Therefore, when a kid is old enough to start going to school, it’s also a tough time for parents to make a decision to choose type of education system which they trust enough to hand over the children’s future. According to a source, when compare to traditional public school, although some of charter schools were “successful”, some were “troubled and struggling”, but most of them were “somewhere in between just like traditional public schools.”(Grace) .Therefore, in my opinion, the government should not convert all public schools to charter schools because charter school itself still exists some issues which may make education becomes worse, such as inconformity in school management system, under-performing in comparison to public schools, and teachers’ experiences.

This paper will discuss charter school conflicts with the public schools on different issues. According to Ron Zimmer and Richard Buddin, “The last few years have been marked by dramatic growth in charter schools in California". In a recent radio forum, KQED Public Media, Titled Growth of Charter Schools in California Leads to Conflict with School Districts, discuses about the conflict between charter school and public school in the Oakland school district. This paper will also farther diagnose the particular conflict, to better understand it, to find the root cause of

The propose of charter schools is to improve students achievement that there are more teachers, and they try to be one on one teaching so that they can make sure students can learn and understand what they need to be succeed. Students are also required to hold their academic in order to keep their places in charter school, so students will work harder to achieve their goal. Parents do not need to worry about the issue about over population in a class because charter schools have small size classes than the regular public schools, so teachers can take care of students better. As charter schools have the same standard test as traditional public schools, charter schools perform better than public schools. Additionally, charter schools are more flexibility. Charter schools can make the decision on class choices and the way to teach. Charter schools invite parents to participate at schools so that parents can get more communications with their children and this also help with their healthy living. Therefore, according to students and teachers hard working and parents’ participations, charter schools have more advantages than public

The last reason why charter schools are now better than public schools is because charter schools are not dealing with racial problems. This means that there are no such things as racism in charter schools while some public schools are now still have to deal with bullying and racist actions from one student toward another. With the amount of bullying and racism still happening out there, children needed this type of environment to study in so that they don’t have to be afraid or stress out. This is an important factor that makes charter schools so special. Not only charter schools don’t have any racism issues, they also provide students with disabilities special programs to make them feel like home. According to Ronald W. Holmes, a PhD from

Some parents claim there’s nothing better than them. Others argue that they place profit above education. Whatever the opinion, one thing is certain; charter schools are becoming the most controversial public education issue in the United States. Charter schools have combined features of both public and private schools. The reason these schools are better for students, parents and the community are vast. Since they are exempt from the rules and policies imposed on public schools, they have some notable advantages. First, the teachers have more freedom to prepare lessons, and schools themselves can emphasize certain courses according to the necessity of the students. Second, they can offer limited enrollment to keep class sizes small, which

Charter schools are supposed to contribute to school innovation and reform by their combination of freedom and accountability (Innovations in Education: Successful Charter Schools 2004, 1). Those that support charter schools hope that due to their independence they will be able to spark innovative reforms, promote competition within the public school sector and provide new options to families (Finn, Manno, & Vanourek, 2000; Nathan 1998a; 1998b). Then those on the opposite end of the spectrum, argue that charter schools and greater choice within the public sector may cause further racial segregation and cause economical strains for not only states but school districts; all while not being proved to be more effective (Wells et al., 1998; Fiske & Ladd,

Charter schools have become a rival for public schools. Charters schools are public schools by option; therefore parents must initiate the interest in the school thus enrolling their children into the program. On the other hand, public schools are open to any student and do not require a waitlist or lottery system to be enrolled. It is difficult to define the “best education” because parents seek different things when researching school options for their child. The purpose of education is to develop skills in individuals that will give them a foundation for a lifelong curiosity to create a program that will benefit each person individually. Lyndon Johnson once said, “Let us think of education as the means of developing our greatest abilities, because in each of us there is a private hope and dream which, fulfilled, can be translated into benefit for everyone and greater strength for our nation.” Support from the State of Texas is essential for the growth of education and emphasize the importance of receiving a strong foundation on education but can be limited by the funding. Although charter and public schools in Texas strive to provide the best education for students with the funding given, charter schools have an advantage on innovation but pubic school offer open enrollment.

Charter schools are defined as a publicly funded school, established as an autonomous institution with educational goals set by it board, and operating by contract or charter with local school board or state. (oed.com). Since these schools are privatized, many parents believe they are somehow better performing than neighborhood public schools. Charter schools rely on convincing data to justify the practice of privatizing schools, data that shows high performing students. However, they hide the fact that they often shun away minority students, financially disadvantaged students, and students with learning disabilities.

According to its supporters, charter schools show great promise as the sweet spot between private and public schools (CREDO,