Charter Schools Research Paper

There are a number of ways that charter schools give parents greater individual control over their childrens’ education. No longer is a child bound to attend a particular school based on the geographical location of his or her home. Parents have the freedom to select a charter school that they feel would best suit the needs of their children1. Parents also have a greater say in the affairs of charter schools compared to public schools. In many instances, parents serve on the “board of education” governing the charter school, a board whose context is determined by a school’s charter and not state law. This contrasts with the traditional public school board that is limited to seven members elected from the community-at-large, regardless of whether board members have children in school. Moreover, a charter school board is entirely occupied with the operations of just one school instead of an entire district. Charter school supporters argue that this leads to less bureaucracy and greater efficiency in creating school policy that ultimately benefits students.

Because they are given the option of enrollment, both students and parents are on average more likely to be involved with the school and its program. Arguably, charter schools act as a stimulant for improving all public education. While doing a better job at reaching out to students than public schools because of their styles of teaching, it allows educators to be more personal and creative with their work and methods.

Public education has had a negative effect on students; it’s often because of the bigger class sizes, poor test scores, and high crime in the surrounding areas. Public schools need to revise their system to determine what’s the best fit for their student’s educational needs. All children who live in a school district have a right to attend a district school. Many parents would like more options and opportunities for their child, and would like to be involved in their child’s education. Charter schools are part of the answer for a better educational choice for children’s academic achievement. Charter schools have many successful methods and continue to pave the way for children’s education needs .

Charter schools are unique public schools that is allowed the freedom to be more innovative while being held accountable for advancing student achievement. These charter schools are not private schools, they do not charge for tuition and they are open to all children within specific boundaries. Research has demonstrated that charter schools make picks up in the urban community with students who have veritably been undeserved by traditional state funded schools. Charter schools outscored their traditional school peers in 25 of the 41 cities in math, and 23 of the 42 cities in reading. On average, charter schools had no significant impacts on student’s achievement. Charter schools help enhance student learning, empower the utilization of new and imaginative educating strategies, and give schools an approach to move from a lead based to an execution based arrangement of responsibility. Public schools are like charter schools except for the freedom that a charter school has. And private school is based on tuition and that is funded by charities and tax holders in that community.

Why choose to go to Charter School rather than public school? Charter schools are public school of choice, meaning families choose for their children. Federal legislation provides grants to help charters to manage start-up costs. They create better educational opportunities for the students therefore they have higher expectations in teaching. Charter Schools and zoned (public) schools are tuition free but unfortunately not everyone can get in to Charter school, since it works by lottery. Everyone has the opportunity to apply and has a choice to attend Charlet School if the students are lucky enough to get in. Charter schools are more effective for three reasons: they have higher graduation rates, teachers are more prepared and devoted to their students, and teachers take a greater responsibility for their students as they compete against Zoned Schools.

The charter school conflict exists because there are some people for it and some people against it. According to, The Premier Online Debate Website, arguments of those of charter school is that it allows individuals or groups with innovative educational ideas to put them into practice without being controlled by local or state administration. These schools may have unconventional hours, experiment with curricula, specialize in certain types of teaching or design programs tailored to a particular audience or community. They believe that charter schools provide quality education and they allow teachers to try new teaching methods which allows students to develop under new education styles because charter schools have less regulation. It can introduce the ingredient of a measure of needed competition in the public schools. According to Sarah Cordes and Institute for Education and Social Policy (IESP) New York University, "charter school growth means that more students have opportunities to attend charters and that more traditional public schools face competition from charters in the local school marketplace". They may provide for more accountability because schools that work will be rewarded and those that do not will be changed or even closed.

charter schools because when their students leave their school to enroll in a charter school, they lose funding that was going to them. It’s different than the student leaving their school district for another district. Because when a student enrolls in a charter school, the district he or she leaves loses it’s per pupil and levy money. If a student moved from one district to another district, the one being left would lose it’s per pupil money, but keeps its levy money. So a school does lose more of their budget if a student leaves them for a charter school. (1-3) Schools obviously don’t want their budget to be reduced. So a lot of the animosity comes from them losing money. Maybe if they would just do a better job with their students in the first place, a lot of their students wouldn’t want or need to leave to go to a charter school. That’s not to say that all students are leaving are the schools fault; sometimes it’s just what’s best for the family of the student. But maybe a lot of students enrolling in charter schools do come from their former schools not performing the best that they could.

In like a manner, Charter schools improve the learning environments for students and help improve focus on learning and achievement. To a direct quote from the RAND Corporation, “Charter schools are publicly funded schools that operate outside direct school district control and are intended to provide educational choice to families, reduce bureaucratic constraints on educators and provide competitive pressure to conventional public schools.” Which however signifies, Charter schools adapted to student’s specific needs and abilities, as well as offer individualized choices and alternative pathways in the educational system. For a counterargument, Opponents to school choice argue that “test scores alone may not fully measure the benefits of charter schools for their students.” For more reasoning of charter schools, the existences of charter schools, improved specific, or challenging curriculum offerings could also serve to increase the competition between traditional and charter public schools. Increase flexibility for staff and teachers could “reduce bureaucratic constraints on educators.” The environment in charter schools is more socially supportive, and is less prone to

For nearly a decades, charter schools have become the modern rival of public schools, but does the charter schools is the best? In modern society, people keep chasing the American dream; they want to achieve better life quality and higher education. As most people believe, education is a primarily way to train children all the skills which will need as adults to find good jobs and live well, but the nation have many different types of schools, such as private schools, charter schools, home schools, or traditional public schools. Therefore, when a kid is old enough to start going to school, it’s also a tough time for parents to make a decision to choose type of education system which they trust enough to hand over the children’s future. According to a source, when compare to traditional public school, although some of charter schools were “successful”, some were “troubled and struggling”, but most of them were “somewhere in between just like traditional public schools.”(Grace) .Therefore, in my opinion, the government should not convert all public schools to charter schools because charter school itself still exists some issues which may make education becomes worse, such as inconformity in school management system, under-performing in comparison to public schools, and teachers’ experiences.

In order for a charter school to be successful they have to attract students. Charter schools tell parents what they intend to do, show they've worked with other children, and have really good plans for helping the students that have different levels of achievement; these types of charter schools are the ones that parents need to look for. What they're trying sot do is create options for students who've been in public schools and haven't done well; and for that they are held to a higher

One of the reasons we consider or support charter schools is there is good chance that it could be one the things that will improve student's education achievements. Lots parents believe that it has enormous potential to improve achievement. We have seen that the competition

Students in charter schools has their education results improved significantly compares to the others who are going to public schools. Charter schools, like public schools, receive public funding. These school are

Charter Schools are public schools and are tuition-free and provide families and students with an educational alternative that is not being met in the public school system. The standing question is: What is the public school system lacking in their programs to lose students to Charter Schools? “Obama’s faith in charter schools-which are financed by taxpayers but operated outside the strictures of the normal public-school system—that’s proving most controversial” (Fuller, 2010). A study of 49 districts in five states, including California, claim “nearly half of district leaders perceived that charter schools had negatively affected their budget and explained this impact by pointing to the reduced revenue from students who had transferred from districts schools to charter schools” (Challenge, 2003). President Clinton boosted federal funding for charters.

Charter schools are an alternative to public schools. Whether this alternative is a better solution to the public schools is the argument. Public schools can be just as creative as charter schools. Public schools are funded by our tax dollars, which ultimately the United States Government decides where those funds go. Education should be the last thing to be cut in the budget, but unfortunately, we the people do not have a choice other than the public offices whom we hope will do what they have said in their election speeches. Charter schools have come about to fill the gap that public schools cannot fill. They can gear their curriculum to student needs, where some public schools cannot because of funding cuts.

Education is a very important aspect in society and is valued by parents, politicians, educators, and others in the community. The education of children is a vital role in any organized system because the future depends on those who are young to take over in the cycle of society. The institutions that provide children with an education can be divided into two categories known as traditional public schools and nontraditional schools. Nontraditional schools provide students with different learning environments compared to traditional schools and some specific examples of these schools are magnet schools, charter schools, and virtual schools (Newberry). All of these schools are relatively new and have controversial views across the country.