Charles Foster Kane was a man with an enormous amount of wealth and clout. He had it all, money, women, anything he could possibly want. But for a man who seems like he has everything, in reality he is missing one of the only things that money can’t buy, his childhood and happiness. Throughout his life he is desperately searching for the thing that can return his childhood. He searches so desperately that he pushes himself into solitude, and ends up dying alone.
All Charles Foster Kane wanted was the life he lived before Thatcher came and took him away. He has been rebelling against Thatcher his whole life, because he believes it’s his fault for taking him away from his family. He uses the newspaper business he took over as a way to get back at Thatcher. He encourage a war with Spain, and tries to ruin Thatcher's political goals and
…show more content…
But all he wants is to be happy and he wants this so bad, that he manipulates the people in his life and end up pushing them away. His relationship with his first wife is a prime example, at first Kane and his first wife couldn’t have seen more happy, the typical American marriage. He even tells his wife he’ll call the inquiry to tell them he can’t come in until the afternoon just to spend more time with her. But as time goes on he becomes obsessed with the newspaper business, and spends most of his time at the inquiry. To me the power and wealth he gained temporarily filled the hole in his heart and that’s why he became obsessed with it because it brought him happiness. But when this wasn’t enough for him anymore, he manipulated people, almost forcing them to love and adore him. This causes him to push away all his friends, and workers at the inquiry. His
Citizen Kane by Orson Welles is a story that was made for excellence. However, since it was about William Randolph Hearst, it did not do too well. Many movies didn't want to play the film because they were scared of Hearst and his power. Although, many could not see the movie it still became one of the greatest films ever made through its uncommon angles, montages, and lighting.
Since the beginning of the Industrial Age, Americans have idealized the journey towards economic success. One thing people do not realize, however, is that that journey is not the same for every individual. For Charles Foster Kane (Orson Welles), the main character of Citizen Kane, directed by Orson Welles, the path towards riches and a fulfilled life is being well liked. He serves to please others. He strives for that attention. This view cost him his happiness in the end. In this man’s rise and fall through prosperity, Welles shows the futility of striving solely for likeability.
Charles' selfish pride is depicted in a group of cuts with his new wife Emily.
When discussing the greatest films of all time, Citizen Kane, directed by Orson Welles, usually comes up. It’s influence in American cinema can still be felt today, but at the time the film was not released without controversy. The main character in the movie, Charles Foster Kane, is undeniably based of the real life figure of William Randolph Hearst, a famous American newspaper publisher. Hearst was very aware of this fact and tried to hinder the success of Welles’ picture by denying it any sort of press in his newspapers. Despite the smear campaign Kane’s influence lives on through Welles’ revolutionary filmic techniques and its presence in pop culture.
The film Citizen Kane, directed by Orson Welles, is a great example of how a man can be corrupted by wealth. Through the characters in the film we can observe how Charles Foster Kane, an idealistic man with principles, can be changed and misguided by wealth and what accompanies wealth. The film takes places during the late 19th century and early 20th century, a time in American history when the world is changing and wealth is a great power to change it with. Through the story telling of Kane’s life we are able to see how wealth changes, not only Kane’s ideals, but his actions and how he perceives the world.
Charles Kane, a newspaper mogul, died at his home in Xanadu. His last dying words were ‘Rosebud’ which no one had any idea what they meant. A newspaper reporter is given the task to investigate what the word meant. He had to interview many people including Kane’s friends like Jedediah Leland and his concubine Susan Alexander who only shed some light on the mystery of Kane’s life but no information about the Rosebud word. Citizen Kane is the movie that has received lot applause for centuries despite flopping at the box office in 1941. The narrative structure line non-linear form, the mise-en-scene composition, and the cinematography put the film in high regard.
Basically, Citizen Kane tells the story of a fictional newspaper magnate, Charles Foster Kane. Director Welles could have presented Kane’s life story chronologically, letting their plot present incidents in story order as most fictional biographies do, But he chose another option he decided to trace Kane’s life through flashbacks, recalled by people who knew him. To motivate the characters’ flashback, Welles hit upon the idea of having a media reporter seek the meaning of Kane’s dying word, “Rosebud.” This generates a second line of action the reporter Thompson’s investigation of Kane’s life. The result is a film that creates an unusual relation of plot to story.
Throughout history filmmakers have made specific narrative and cinematic choices to create compelling storylines. There are many different strategies that can be explored when developing a narrative. The 1941 film, Citizen Kane directed by Orson Welles is a phenomenal example of the exploration of innovative uses in photography, sound and editing. Orson Welles uses staging, shadows, low-key lighting, deep focus and overlapping dialogue to emphasize various aspects of the film. The main character Charles Foster Kane is sent away by his parents when he is just little boy after they come into a large amount of money. Due to this, he grows up to be an insensitive and vain man. Kane becomes very successful but uses his wealth and position of power to govern the people in his life. Welles uses these cinematic techniques to accentuate the idea that Charles Kane 's desire to control the people around him eventually drives away those who care about him, leaving him powerless and alone.
Citizen Kane tells the provocative, epic story of a Charles Kane, A newfound wealth kid who acquired a fortune, was detracted from his unassuming environment and his dad and mom, was raised by a financier, and turned into a spectacularly well off, self-important, and enthusiastic newspaperman. He made his notoriety for being the liberal, hopeful champion of the underprivileged, and set his self absorbed personality on a political profession, until the point when those political dreams were broken after the disclosure of a silly 'love-settle' undertaking with an artist. Kane's life was defiled and at last self-destructed by a desire to satisfy the American long for progress, acclaim, riches, and influence. After two fizzled relational unions and a change into a dismal, odd, and oppressive creature, his last days were burned through alone, gloomy, and despondent before his demise in his very own hermitic shelter making - an unpromising manor loaded with endless belonging to make up for his life's vacancy.
By many, Citizen Kane is one of the greatest films ever made. Orson Wells, at age 25, directed, produced, and starred in this film. Citizen Kane is a memorable film for countless reasons. The film brought about controversy because it fictionalized the life of William Randolph Hearst, a powerful newspaper publisher. The film draws remarkable parallels with his life and his relationship with his mistress. There is also speculation that the film is loosely based on Wells’ life as well. This movie tells the fascinating story of the life and death of Charles Foster Kane, a narcissistic newspaper runner, politician, and a wealthy millionaire. What makes this movie spectacular is not only the acting of the actors, but the
Orson Welles’ film Citizen Kane (1941) centres around the theme of interpreting a person’s life once they have died. Working on only Charles Kane’s last word ‘Rosebud’, news reporter Jerry Thompson is tasked with discovering its meaning and by doing so tries to unravel the real meaning of Kane’s life behind his public accomplishments and material wealth. With the help of the unreliability of the narrators, caused by prejudice and old age, Thompson is taken on a journey of Freudian (Carringer, p.185) discovery in which his goal, at least to him and the film’s characters, is never completed. By analysing the visual and narrative function of ‘Rosebud’, this essays aim is to argue that although dismissed by Orson Welles as "a gimmick really, and rather dollar-book Freud" (Bates, p.4), ‘Rosebud’ plays a significant role in carrying the narrative of the film.
These two single frames sum up Kane’s story of his pursuit of power; his rise to, and his fall from power. Contrasting the two frames depicts the two extremes that Kane experienced, reflecting the constant value of ambition. Kane’s ambition lead to his great power, but ultimately also lead to his descent, commenting on the dangers behind the pursuit of influence. Frame one paints Kane’s life as colourful and successful, a hall packed
The absolutely stunning film, Citizen Kane (1941), is one of the world’s most famous and highly renowned films. The film contains many remarkable scenes and cinematic techniques as well as innovations. Within this well-known film, Orson Welles (director) portrays many stylistic features and fundamentals of cinematography. The scene of Charles Foster Kane and his wife, Susan, at Xanadu shows the dominance that Kane bears over people in general as well as Susan specifically. Throughout the film, Orson Welles continues to convey the message of Susan’s inferiority to Mr. Kane. Also, Welles furthers the image of how demanding Kane is of Susan and many others. Mr. Welles conveys the message that Kane has suffered a hard life, and will
There were a couple of scenes that showed this truth, the obsession that Mr. Kane had with buying statues and just having them in the house. The whole idea of trying to find out what Rosebud meant to him or what it was. The newspaper writer Thompson interviewed everyone that was important in Mr. Kane’s life but still didn’t get the understanding behind Rosebud and when it was revealed at the end it didn’t make any senses as to what it was. The whole idea of Mr. Kane having a life that he was portrayed as being in control of everything by getting his way and acting as if he was happy and the only time he was truly happy was when he was home with his mother playing outside on his sledge. The scene when Mr. Kane took over the paper and moved into the office at the Inquirer to make sure the paper ran twenty-four hours a day is not very realistic. Also the scene when he is giving his speech about becoming governor, looking at that I thought he had already won and that was his victory speech.
The film also features a logical approach that results in the revelation of various themes in the film. There are different themes that are bound to be explored in the movie preview, including the theme of leadership. Kane is shown as a strong respectable leader, although he lives on the outside of the community his wishes are for the people of his country to get proper freedom and live in harmony. Kane feels that the government is oppressing the people and it is up to him and his