Chapter 12, Lesson 1 Chapter 12, Lesson 1
Questions from Subheadings Notes What was the industrial growth? In colonial times, people lived where they worked This was usually a farm They made the things that they needed, such as furniture or clothes In the mid-1700's, people began inventing new ways to do these things A British inventor built a machine that spins thread They built mills along rivers and paid people to work them This was the start of the Industrial Revolution What was the industrial revolution reaching the U.S.? The Industrial Revolution started in the U.S. near 1800 Mills first appeared in New England because of the poor soil and many rivers Also, the area had many ports, so they could ship lots of goods
What were
…show more content…
more federal power Who was Henry Clay? He called for higher tariffs, a new bank, and new domestic buildings What was the 2nd national bank? In 1811, the bank died, but in 1816, another one came back This helped restore stability What were the new tariffs? Manufacturers wanted new tariffs This tariff was designed to protect U.S. businessmen When Congress passed more tariffs, the South protested What was growing sectionalism? The tariffs created different views in different parts of the country These brought an end to the era of good feelings 3 distinct sections grew in the U.S. Geography, economics, and history contributed to this sectionalism Clay spoke for the West, Calhoun for the South, and Webster for the North What was nationalism and the Supreme Court? Marshall gave the Supreme Court many more powers In 1810, Fletcher v. Peck, the Supreme Court could declare state laws unconstitutional In 1819, McCulloch v. Maryland, Maryland was not allowed to tax the U.S. government In this ruling, the bank was constitutional, but the constitution never gave written permission Congress now could tax, issue, and borrow …show more content…
There were many debates in Congress Henry Clay suggested the Maine join as a free state and Missouri as a slave state This would keep an even balance Also, the compromise created a horizontal line across the new territory Nothing North of this line could have slaves This made a temporary block on sectionalism However, sectionalism could have no peaceful ending
What were the foreign affairs? The war of 1812 created more nationalism What were the relations with Britain? Also, better ties were wanted with European nations During Monroe's presidency, 2 big agreements were made with Britain In 1817: Rush-Bagot treaty limited warships on Great Lakes
What were the relations with Spain? Convention of 1818 set ne border with Canada at 49th parallel John Q. Adams also negotiated right for U.S. to settle in Oregon area Spain controlled East and West Florida In 1810 U.S. settlers rebelled against Spain By 1812, U.S. owned West Florida Spain objected to losing West Florida, but took no action Natives from East Florida raided
3. Tina incorporates her sole proprietorship with assets having a fair market value of $100,000 and an adjusted
1820 agreement crafted by Henry Clay. It was a settlement that allowed Missouri as a slave state and to balance it out Maine becomes a free state, banning slavery north of the 36°30’N latitude. The significance of the compromise is retaining the balance between slave and free states. The compromise solved the short-term crisis. But that crisis had exposed the growing division btwn the North and the South over the expansion of slavery.
In the early 1800s, it appeared that these political battles could be decided with congressional compromises. Document A, also known as the Missouri Compromise, was created in 1820 to address the new state of Missouri. Whether or not Missouri was a slave state or free would be a watershed event, as from the onset it appeared one side would have more power in Congress. However, Henry Clay, one of the most famous congressmen of the time, was able to split up Massachusetts in order to create a new free state, Maine. With Maine being free, Missouri could join as a slave state, and both sides were appeased. However, no side was ever truly appeased, with Kansas-Nebraska act eventually repealing the Missouri compromise in 1854, only 34 years later. It is true that many more states were added into the union in those 34 years, such as Texas, California, and New Mexico. However, the Missouri compromise itself was not thought out for the long term, as it designated a single latitude line to divide the slave and free
Congress agreed to admit Missouri as a slave state and marked Maine as a separate state
In 1820, a politician by the name of Henry Clay decided to help work out a compromise that would keep the balance the North and South. Clay suggested that Congress should admit Maine as a free state and Missouri as a slave state. The official proposal was passed in March of 1820 and prohibited slavery from any territories in the Louisiana Purchase that was North of 36°30’ latitude. (The American Journey Page 320,437, and 438) Almost thirty years later, a dispute over slavery broke out in Congress because a bill was introduced by Illinois senator Stephen Douglas. Douglas originally wanted to run for president but in order to do that he needed the support of the Southern Democrats. With Douglas trying to win over both northerners and southerners, the Kansas-Nebraska act proclaimed that Kansas and Nebraska territories would have the choice to be a free or slave state. Douglas was basically saying that “they” being Congress would repeal the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and would rely on “popular sovereignty” which is letting the people decide. He figured that because Kansas and Nebraska becoming slave
The Missouri Compromise was created by Henry Clay and it was passed in 1820.The Missouri compromise was made between Northern anti-slavery states and Southern pro-slavery states, because they wanted both states to be equal. During the Compromise, the north and south arugued with each other whether the new states should be slave state or free state. There were many effects that caused by the Missouri Compromise. For example, Maine entered the United Staes as a free state and Missouri entered the United Sates as a slave state. But the south lost the chance to admit more slave holding states besides what they owned in the small territory, and in the north Maine was separated from Massachusetts. During that age, slavery was banned in parts of the
The Missouri Compromise was an effort by Congress to keep the delicate balance between the slave and free states that would have been upset by the addition of Missouri as a slave state. After a tedious back and forth between the free and slave states, Henry Clay, speaker of the house at the time, orchestrated the missouri compromise in March 1820. The compromise stated that congress would not restrict the admission of Missouri as a slave state but as a result Maine would be added as a free state. Northerners also wanted a prohibition of slavery in the remaining territory of the louisiana purchase north of 36° 30´ latitude line. The compromise was important because it put off the dreaded debate of slavery, albeit not for long. The compromise
The Massachusetts’ District of Maine had also applied for statehood around the same time that Missouri did. The North realized that if Maine became a free state in the North, the political power in the House of Senate and overall Congress would be tipped towards favoring the North and their anti-slavery ideals. Because of this, the southern states had to block Maine’s admission into the United States
In 1820 Missouri wanted to join the Union as a slave state. Since it would ruin the balance between Slave states and Free states in the Senate, Henry Clay came up with the Missouri compromise. What it did was make Missouri a Slave state and Maine a free state. “This law prohibited slavery in the Louisiana Territory north of the 36° 30´ latitude line.”(Bibliography source #2) It also allowed the owners to recapture runaway slaves that fled to the North, like wanted posters describing them and how much for the reward. “Runaway from the subscriber, on the night of Thursday, the 30th of September” (Bibliography#3) They limited themselves by only applying the Compromise to the states gained in the Louisiana Purchase, this than led to the fighting after the Mexican war when America gained new territories in the West. This ruined the Missouri Compromise. Historians believe that if the Compromise had been applied to all
In 1819, two more states wishing to join the union, were Missouri and Maine. Missouri wanted to join the union in the in the north, but as a slave state. this would make the balance of power in congress unequal. Many northerners opposed this idea. Northerners proposed that Missouri be a slave state and that no more slaves were to be brought in, and all slave children would be free at age 25. Eventually Missouri would be a free state. Southerners were opposed to this idea. Congress debated for months. This brought about the Missouri Compromise of 1820, when Henry Clay proposed that Maine enter the union as a free state. He also proposed prohibiting slavery above the 36’30’ latitude, which is the southern boundary of Missouri. Since plantations would not be able to survive further north of this line, the South agreed.
Henry Clay was the writer of The Missouri Compromise, he tried to limit the slavery boundaries, and it was later acknowledged as an unconstitutional and it’s also considered one of the several events that led to the American civil war. The compromise was an example for the settling from North and South differences over the slavery and duty issues and it also remained in result until rescinded by the Kansas-Nebraska act of 1854.The Missouri Compromise relieved pressures among the North and the South delaying the civil war The American Civil War. According to the history February
Southerners believes that if the United States could forbid slavery in Missouri, they could do so elsewhere. It 1820 congress finally agreed that slavery would be allowed in Missouri, but at the same time Maine would be carved out and admitted to the union as a free state. They also agreed that as the United States Expanded westward, states north of the 36 and a half degrees North would be free states, while states south of that would be slave states. This angered the north because under the compromise the new slave states covered more land than that of the new free states. Northerners worried that another slave state might increase the power of the southern states in the government.
At the time, the United States contained twenty-two states, evenly divided between slave and free. In the years leading up to the Missouri Compromise of 1820, tensions began to rise between proslavery and antislavery factions within the U.S. Congress and across the country. They reached a boiling point after Missouri’s 1819 request for admission to the Union as a slave state, which threatened to upset the delicate balance between slave states and free states. To keep the peace, Congress came up with a two-part compromise, granting Missouri’s request but also admitting Maine as a free state. It also passed an amendment that drew an imaginary line across the former Louisiana Territory, establishing a boundary between free and slave regions that remained the law of the land until it was repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.
He was a strong believer in popular sovereignity. Since he felt so strongly about it, he agreed that popular sovereignity would decide whether or not Kansas and Nebraska would be free states or slave states. This decision caused a huge disagreement between the North and South because this would allow slavery north of the Mason-Dixon dividing line created in the Missouri Compromise. The president at the time, Franklin Pierce, supported Douglas’ bill and passed it on May 30th, 1854.
The Missouri Compromise stated Missouri would be a slave state and Maine would be carved out of Massachusetts and created into a non-slave state. The Missouri Compromise really angered the North, contributing to the Civil War.