Challenges Of Fracking

The use of fracking has brought on many environmental concerns in exchange for its revolutionary impact on the energy industry. There is a significant amount of water necessary in the process of fracking resulting in a heavy toll to the environment. Carcinogenic chemicals involved in fracking could may well escape and contaminate the groundwater around the site, which could be due to lack of diligence rather than an inherent risk. There are increased concerns that the fracking process are linked to earth tremors. Fracking increases our reliance on fossil fuels, rather than investing in renewable energy, which is a better long-term alternative.

What is fracking? Fracking, according to Webster’s Dictionary, is to force water, sand, and chemical fluids into a crack or seam in a subterranean level of rock so that natural gas or oil may be harvested as it escapes through the crack. Fracking causes many harmful effects to the environment, but it does help the economy in a tremendous way. Fracking can cause loads of chemicals out into the air and into the water supply and it can also cause small earthquakes and tremors. It is useful for the economy because there is a lot of money to be made in this new industry and it provides an extreme amount of jobs and opportunity for the public. Although it is very helpful, fracking is more wrong because the damage done to our planet is much more important and concerning compared to the notion of quick cash.

Fracking is the breaking of rocks in order to release oil gases stuck inside them. They do this by drilling down real deep and pump a mixture of water, sand and chemicals. The mixture causes rocks to crack and release oil gases and are pushed into a container. Of course there are benefits to fracking, but there are major negative effects of fracking. Mostly effects that affect our population.A primary example of negative effects is the contamination of drinking water for people (Source C). This is very bad because it affects a huge amount of the population the the United States if the water is contaminated. The contaminated water cannot be clean or purified through normal means making it nearly impossible to clean. “Water for fracking is typically

What is fracking? Fracking is the blasting of water and chemicals 8000ft into the earth to break apart the rock, but that’s not the true question. The true question is whether or not fracking is a positive or negative thing. Like most actions that make money, fracking has it’s positive and negative side effects, but which over powers the other? Below, I will discuss the opinions expressed in Gasland, Fracknation, Truthland, and other articles written on the subject, while offering my own opinion on the subject of fracking.

Fracking, does it have more consequence or benefits? Well first let me explain what fracking is. Fracking is formally known as (Hydraulic Fracturing), an exceedingly confrontational procedure commonly used today to extort oil and natural gas from the earth. Many exponents of fracking congratulate the encouraging economic impacts and job creations. But they fail to recognize the effects fracking have on the climate and societies across America.

Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, is the process of extracting natural gas from shale rock layers deep within the earth.The dangers of fracking are the chemicals that go into fracking and how much water is used and contamination of city water. Some dangers of fracking are water usage. They use 2 to 5 million gallons of water. Not all of the chemicals are recovered from the ground. We only know of 8 out of 600 chemicals. To many chemicals are used and some a harmful. Fracking water usage is too high for instance one well can use 144,000,000million gallons of water. 50%-70% of the fracking fluid is left in the ground and isn’t biodegradable. The waste fluid that is outside in the sunlight evaporates and releases volatile organic compounds(Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are organic chemicals that have a high vapor pressure at ordinary room temperature. Their high vapor pressure results from a low boiling point, which causes large numbers of molecules to evaporate or sublimate from the liquid or solid form of the compound and enter the surrounding air.) Due to the VOCs acid rain, ground level ozone and contaminated air. Ground level ozone is bad, but ozone up high in the atmosphere protects the earth from the Sun’s harmful rays.

With the discovery of new technology that allows for us to drill deeper than ever before, natural gas wells are sprouting up all over the United States. Since 2011, U.S. oil production has increased by almost 3 million barrels a day, with a total production at 8.5 million barrels in July 2014. The growth in fracking efficiency has brought a lot of attention and criticism to the subject.

The bottom line is that the environmental impacts of fracking are a real problem, and to which neither prohibition nor laissez faire seems a sensible solution. Instead, looking towards the mitigation of such impacts using economic tools should be applied to regulate the environmental harms.

Concerns with the environment have recently been front and center in the United States. Especially with the pending presidential election, many environmental issues are at the forefront of countless conversations. There is a consensus between parties that domestic energy production must continue to increase, but there are conflicting opinions as to where that energy production should come from. Should we use non-renewable resources or invest in new and innovative renewable energy sources? Our dependency on foreign oil puts the U.S. in a very vulnerable position on both the political and economical fronts. Countless studies have been conducted supporting both arguments. While our environment is a major consideration for determining which sources to utilize, the economic implications must also be weighed. Renewable energy sources could last indefinitely, but will need to be repaired and/or replaced at some point. One alternative to renewable energy is a practice called “Fracking”. Fracking is slang for hydraulic fracturing. It is commonly described as a technique used to release petroleum, natural gas (including shale gas, tight gas and coal seam gas), or other substances for extraction (Philippe Charlez, 1997).

Fracking is a good way to get energy. Natural gas is becoming the fuel of choice for generating electricity. The Department of Energy expects 21 percent of U.S. electricity to be derived from natural gas by 2035. Fracking has cleaner burning properties that have contributed to the increased use of natural gas for electricity generation and also as a transportation fuel for fleet vehicles in the United States. This methods is better for the earth by flaring or burning natural gas at well sites. “This is considered to be safer than releasing methane into the atmosphere because CO2 is not as potent a greenhouse gas as methane.”(Natural Gas and the Environment) Fracking is a good way to get natural gas, but some people say it destroys the

Fracking is a technique used to drill oil and gas from shale rock using highly pressurized liquid to fracture the rock. It came up in the year 1947 and was embraced as a new technology in the field of mining regarding increased efficiency and effectiveness of mining oil and gas and the economic benefits that came forth. However, it also became highly controversial due to its potential environment impacts like water contamination, triggering tremors and possible hazards to the public health. From an ethical point of view, people need to know about any dangers that they might face as a result of fracking.

What is ecology? Provide an example of 3 scales at which ecology can be applied? Name one field of study which is associated with ecology?

A. The most frequently quoted definition of Sustainable Development states the following, “Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”.

Environmental – “an environmentally sustainable system must maintain a stable resource base, avoiding over-exploitation of renewable resource systems or environmental sink functions, and depleting non-renewable resources only

“Do you think that the lifestyle of the inhabitants of your town or city reflects behavior that is in line with the concept of sustainable development? In your opinion, what should be improved?”