Censorship In China Research Paper

Given the increasing regulations of the Internet and email by the Government of China, recommend to the CEO of Google whether the company should continue to operate in China, the world’s fastest and among the largest growth markets.

China is best known for its “Great Firewall in China” for blocking its citizen access to certain sites including: Google, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, The Pirate Bay, The New York Times, and Dropbox. Many have been able to get around this by using a VPN, a Virtual Private Network, and using services like Private Internet Access, a paid VPN. These act as a middleman, encrypting and sending your internet data to servers in the US, to see uncensored websites, allowing censorship to be destroyed

In the book 1984, the government has control over all media “and so it was with every class of recorded fact, great or small. Everything faded away into a shadow-world in which, finally, even the date of the year had become uncertain” (Orwell 37). Due to the party’s restraint of all media, there are no actual certainty of written records. Without written records, no one knows if the government is being truthful about what has happened in the past. The citizens even question their memories and logic because there is no certainty of the past. Without records, the government can rearrange history however they please because there is no evidence to prove they are wrong. Similarly, in the article, “The Other Side Of the Great Firewall”, China has set up an immense system of “online censorship, commonly known as the Great Firewall, [which] blocks the populace from viewing material deemed dangerous to the state” (Beech etal 2). The chinese government has blocked the chinese citizens from being able to go on a variety of websites in order to protect China from western influences. Without certain websites, the government can regulate what their citizens can see and can hide what they don’t want their citizens to see. The citizens are being blocked from information that is considered dangerous to their government. The government continually will have total jurisdiction through the use of blocking websites

This fear comes from laws in China that require citizens and organizations to cooperate with the government with state intelligence, however there is no proof of this happening, as well as the CEO of TikTok saying that the Chinese government has not asked for user data. However, all that was needed was a vague connection to China and the reputation of China being bad for the rumors to spread and people to believe them. Another example of hysteria in China would be the Spy Balloon hysteria. On January 28th, a Chinese spy balloon entered Alaska and drifted eastward over the continental U.S. while making stops. This continued until the balloon was shot down over South

We challenge and books, news articles, etc. everyday. We challenge and ban books for various reasons such as: having inappropriate information, alcohol and drugs, etc. In my article China Clamps Down on Online News Reporting the Chinese government asked online news reporters such as Sina, Sohu, NetEase, and Phoenix. I wouldn’t know how to respond to this due to the fact that I have never read these news sites. If I did, though they probably

A famous example took place in May 2006, when Chinese netizens encountered difficulty connecting to Hotmail, which is an important method to communicate with foreign partners, since it is used all around the world. Also, soon after this event, Chinese netizens again reported that the access to POP mailboxes in many mail providers was difficult. Although Chinese netizens have tried to use blogs and forums to maintain communication, many blogs have been blocked ever since then, including Xanga and the LiveJournal. This makes international cooperation difficult. From this, the efficiency of producing commodities and the quality of the products in China cannot catch up with international standards, thus the Chinese economy suffers.

It is interesting to note that some of the new Internet regulations contradict International Laws signed by the Chinese government. China signed the

Within the United States, the first amendment, freedom of speech includes the cyber-web. However, the government may try to examine personal information to protect its citizens from planned terroristic activities. Even so, these terrorists are allowed to say whatever they want, but it does not mean it will be ignored and not taken as a literal threat by the government. Throughout other parts the world, however, countries rely on communicating through means of the internet as ways to spread propaganda. In countries like China specifically, their government censors its citizens to prevent the spreading of propaganda or other radicalism. However, due to the fact that China’s strategy is so

The Freedom of Speech is granted to every American citizen and has been since it was founded in 1776; however, not every nation grants that right. China, as a communist nation, retains most individual freedom rights from its citizens. Although in the Peoples Republic of China’s (PRC) 1982 constitution, people are guaranteed Freedom of Expression and Press; it is often violated by the current corrupt government. The government demands the news to be 80% positive and 20% negative, altering the facts n occasion. In contrast to that, America has recently become more involved with the pressing issue as well because of the involvement of Google. Thus it has shined the light on government censorship and corruption. China’s government corruption

Corporations that move into China have long recognized that internet censorship is a fact of life. In 2006,

Google entered China in 2006 with high hopes of taking over the Chinese internet market. In order to become a major player for internet search engines in China, however, they had buckled and filtered search results according to the Chinese government. When Google.cn was launched, a loud public outcry over its giving in to the Chinese government on censoring and filtering search engine results, the company faced a communications crisis. Since Google had always been known for its free thinking, this seemed a vast contradiction. From a communications standpoint, Google’s greatest vulnerability in this crisis lay with a tarnished public image.

My research project explored the extent of internet censorship and its necessity to China as a form of societal protection. It discussed the advantages, disadvantages and impacts of censorship on Chinese society. As I researched the topic, I determined that censoring parts of the internet was more than just about protecting the young Chinese children from online predators and distressing content. My initial intention was to highlight the wrongfulness of widespread censorship however, as I researched, I was able to understand that censoring parts of the internet improved the Chinese economy, prevented cybercrimes from occurring while concurrently offering online safety. I discovered this by analysing several different websites, YouTube videos and conducting two interviews with people with expertise in the Chinese internet. My outcome, presented in the form of a feature article, explained that censoring parts of the internet benefits society more than it harms.

As of right now, there are no plans or even thoughts of lifting any of the Internet censorship laws in China. If anything, there are plans to add more censorship conditions to the current law set. But, citizens in China are eager to get over the “Great Firewall of China.” They want freedom of Internet access. China also sees social networking sites as a major threat. They are so paranoid about any type of social network

Interests: If Google also provide services such as Gmail, chat rooms or blogging that involve users’ personal information, The Chinese government could abuse the information that Google provides as it did with Yahoo. This will critically damage its principle of “Don’t be evil”

As can be seen at Figure 1, Baidu owns 85.9% of the Chinese Search Engine Market Share. Even the world’s leading search engine provider Google could not compete with Baidu in the Chinese market. Especially during the attempt of cyber attack on Google at 2010 (Yousuf, 2010) to access Gmail accounts of Chinese human right activists, which has led Google to decide that they would no longer censor results on google.cn such as pornography or references to topics such as the Taiwanese independence, the Dalai Lama and the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre and redirect all the searches to a Google Hong Kong. This allowed Google to avoid the strict censorship rules that Baidu and others in China must follow, while also putting it at a major disadvantage in the huge Chinese market (Einhorn & Stone, 2010). Moreover in 2012 when the Chinese