Case Study Of Kiana Bee Stamps

I called the constituent, she asked how can she file a grievance against a CW caseworker that is no longer working for the DHS. She said that Karl Kikman, who was the CW CPS caseworker had told her back in June, that if she cooperates with CW and let him get in her house, this CW case will have a UNFOUNDED disposition, but he lied, after she fully cooperated with him, the case has been coded as a FOUNDED.

This appeal involves a dispute regarding the denial of appellant’s, Pamela Brunner’s (“Brunner’s”) request for accidental disability retirement benefits (“accidental disability”) from appellee, the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System (“RPS”). Brunner contends that the RPS erred in denying her accidental disability after an injury she sustained while working for Montgomery County Public School System. Nearly five years after her injury, Brunner filed an application to receive accidental disability. The medical board of the RPS recommended approving Brunner for ordinary disability, but denied her application for accidental disability. The medical board’s decision was approved by the trustees of the RPS. Brunner appealed the trustees’

The service user I chose to assess is a 17-year-old Hispanic male whose modified name is Ricardo Sanchez. I provided casework services to Ricardo for two years in my previous role as a Therapeutic Caseworker at my current workplace, the Children’s Village, a foster care agency. Ricardo was placed in foster care after he was removed from his father’s care due to verbal and physical abuse. Ricardo’s father assumed his custody after Ricardo’s mother passed over a drug overdose when he was 15. This was Ricardo’s second time in foster care. Ricardo’s first foster care experience happened when he was 10 years-old as a result of alleged physical abuse by his mother, who at the time had full custody of Ricardo. The report was made by Ricardo’s third grade teacher after noticing bruises on Ricardo’s arms. At the time, Ricardo was only in foster care for two months as

Hernandez from August 2012 through July 2013 was conducted. The EBT database shows information about all of the EBT transactions, including the date, time, transaction type, amounts requested and completed, and whether an EBT card is swiped or entered manually. The information in the EBT database is created by Fidelity Information Services (FIS) and maintained by (FIS). An analysis of the EBT benefit transactions confirmed that Ms. Hernandez successfully redeemed monthly SNAP benefits. (See Exhibit # 11)

A review of the Automated Client Eligibility Determination System (ACEDS) and the Document Imaging Management System (DIMS) revealed the following:

RESOURCE UPDATE: Client continues to report last week she went to Center 37 and she was told that her Center is now 066. Client was upset that she was transfer to another shelter. As per the client she will lose her Linc V if she is transferred to Center 66. CM tries to explain to the client HRA transfer many clients because Center 37 is overcrowded. Client reported she requested for her case to be closed. Client continues to report she spoke with HRA Rep Ms. Perez who requested for the client to put her request in writing. Client stated she did put her request in writing to have her case closed from center 66. Then the client provided this worker with copy

Mr. Jackson's residency could not be verified after a home visit was completed by Investigator, Nathan Minor of the Eligibility Review and Investigations Division (ERI) on May 28, 2014. During the visit, Investigator Minor discovered per the DC General Emergency Family Shelter Supervisor, Ms. Moses that no one by the name of Ronald Jackson had ever been a resident at 1900 Massachusetts Ave. S.E., Washington, DC 20003. However, Prosecution and/or program disqualification will not be pursued by the OPRMI due to the approaching Statute of Limitation dated September 12, 2013, and Mr. a preponderance of evidence that Mr. Jackson is a resident in a long-term care

Medical: Ms. Williams failed to submit her medical documentation. Ms. Williams is expected to submit her medical evaluation or physical by 03/2017. Case Manager explained to Ms. Williams that if she failed to submit the documents required she would be considered as non-compliance.

Intentional Program Violation (IPV) is unsubstantiated for DC based on Mr. Hall's benefit history in Maryland. Mr. Hall submitted an application for SNAP benefits in Maryland on October 19, 2012 after he had already been receiving SNAP benefits from DC. Therefore, case closure is recommended for DC. However this case meets referral eligibility for the Maryland Department of Social Services to pursue IPV at this

She stated she moved out of her mother’s home to Northport, Alabama with her oldest child Antonio being placed in elementary school. She stated that in 1987 or 1988, she moved to Canton, Ohio, where she applied for Aid to Dependent Child (ADC); she was informed that someone was already receiving ADC for the children. She stated that she received notification from DHR in Tuscaloosa stating that they did not keep records back that far; the only records they have shown that she received Medicaid at the time. Ms. Lawson stated that during that time, her mother deceived DHR, the juvenile court, etc. and they are still being deceived to this day. Ms. Lawson stated she has always taken care of her children, has never given up custody of her children, been on the system very little; and has always maintained a job. Ms. Lawson stated that other than this issue, she wanted it known that there are other cases regarding her mother having to do with fraud and manipulation of the courts, DHR, and her children; court cases

Mr. Williams applied for Supplemental Social Income (SSI), on August 3, 2015. The Office of Appeals verified with the SSA that Mr. Williams received an unfavorable disability decision, and he currently has a pending claim. Until this unfavorable disability finding is changed by the SSA, DOM must abide by the SSA decision. Accordingly, the RO’s decision is supported by substantial

The Government of the District of Columbia Department of Human Services Office of Program, Monitoring and Investigation (DHSOPRMI) located at 64 New York Avenue, N.E. 6th Floor, Washington DC, 20002 has conducted an investigation of Brittani N. Mason’s Supplemental Nutritional Assistance (SNAP) benefit and determined that an Intentional Program Violation (IPV) has been committed. The program violation has been identified as:

Your client Sue is a Social Work Assistant. In your last session she disclosed that she is concerned that on a recent home visit, herself and a senior colleague did not follow the necessary policies and procedures. They had visited a family with a history of neglect and domestic violence and did not ask to see the child or enter the home, both these actions are prescribed as appropriate as part of their work.

Has your welfare benefits been shut down? Food stamps are a stimulus to people who are unemployed and homeless. It’s also a way for people who are working part time making low wages to receive additional assistance from the government. Hardships like this affect our communities with low income or no income. The city of Atlanta, for instance, is rapidly growing. The United States Census Bureau says, “19.2% of Georgians are in poverty today.” Increased from last year, although there are many factors that contribute to poverty today. Atlanta’s efforts rise in poverty, as food stamp cuts and backlogging shortens local incentives in the Atlanta community, which needs to reform policies as spending, and enrollment responsibility. To help those struggling in our community to actively be aware of what is going on in the community.

Throughout my research, I have gathered a lot of useful information about food stamps, also known as Common Benefit Identification Card (CBIC) (New). Food stamps are a valuable resource for many lower class families and less fortunate individuals. It is the nation's highest anti-hunger program and helps many people. According to fns.usda.gov, “Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) is an electronic system that allows a recipient to authorize transfer of their government benefits from a Federal account to a retailer account to pay for products received. EBT is used in all 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam. EBT has been implemented in all States since June of