Now, compare which fractile’s purchasing power went up during that period with changes in the purchasing powers of the years 1973 to 2000 found in Fig 8. The top one-hundredth percent fractile’s purchasing power went up 7.27 times what it was in 1960. The trend continues with the next nine-hundredth percent fractile. They saw an increase of 3.55 times of what their purchasing power was in 1960. The next four-tenth percent fractile also saw an increase in their purchasing power. Their purchasing power was 2.14 times higher than it was in 1960. The next five-tenth percent fractile’s purchasing power went up 1.72 times higher than it was in 1960 as well. As for the next four percent fractile, their purchasing power went up 1.43 times higher than it was in 1960. The five percent fractile after them went up also, 1.26 times what it was in 1960. The only fractile that lost purchasing power was the bottom ninety. They had 0.95 times the purchasing power they had in 1960. So we can see from Fig 7, that to get out of the great depression the purchasing power of the top fractiles decreased while the bottom ninety percent fractile's purchasing power increased. It is also clear from Fig 8 that, before the great recession that trend went through a dramatic …show more content…
” would be No. the income and wealth inequality levels are higher now than they were before the great depression. Also, if the formula out of an economic crisis is raising the spending power of the bottom ninety percent fractile, the recent economic trends foreshadow yet another economic crisis. Since, “95% of income gains since 2009 have accrued to the top 1%” (Barro). And even, “Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen, who has noted that even if the lower class has access to more economic resources, the trend of a growing income inequality gap will continue to exist as long as the higher class amasses more wealth”
In other words, America has a widening gap between its wealthy and poor. As the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, there is a problem emerging: the disappearance of the middle class. Low-wage workers continue to fall behind those who make higher wages, and this only widens the gap between the two. There has been an economic boom in the United States, which has made the country more prosperous than it has ever been. That prosperity does not reach all people; it seems to only favor the rich. Rising economic segregation has taken away many opportunities for the poor to rise in America today. The poor may find that the economic boom has increased their income; however, as their income increase so does the prices they must for their living expenses (Dreier, Mollenkopf, & Swanstrom 19).
In this article, however, the United States middle-class citizen did not receive more income after the inflation. This is the crucial evidence, which shows that the middle-class in America is not the richest now.
Americans living our time period today, 2010 have a lot of the same similarities as the Americans living in the period of 1934. One of the main similarities is the amount of spending. During 1934 Americans loved to buy things just like Americans due during this time today. Americans in 2010 are said to spend almost three times more then the people that lived five years ago, similar to the people who were a major cause of the Great Depression. Recently last March America faced another Stock Market crash; this one was not at all as severe as the one at the time of the Great Depression. This crash did in fact really hurt families all over our nation though similar to the Great Depression. Families are getting wrenched out of their homes because they cannot pay the bills. Businesses are having to fire an immense portion of there staff because the business cannot afford to pay that may employees. Just like the time of the Great
In 1978, the economy started suffering in the US, because the middle class was getting weaker, and inequality started increasing. According to Reich, the middle class is directly associated with the economy, because 70 percent of the economy is summoned up of consumer spending. The middle class is the foundation of consumer spending. In the late 1970’s and early 1980’s, wages
Americans have the highest standard of living of any civilization ever to exist. Our technology and ease of access to everything afford us lifestyles never achievable to all previous generations. Jobs, cars, and opportunities are equally available for almost everyone. Almost. As a result of the last recession there is an abnormally high number of people living below the poverty line and many more living on welfare. Many people in the United States fear that they cannot provide enough food to their families and barely have the ability to fuel the own cars to get to work. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the rate of poverty ceased to decrease about ten years after the implementation of anti-poverty
The growing corporations in America dominated most of the economy, creating a large gap between the rich and the poor. During this time period food, lightening, and fuel prices declined significantly, and the cost of living
The Great Depression was a harsh global economic depression in the decade prior World War II. The Great Depression, while it happened far before the “Great Recession” of 2008, it can be greatly compared. During the Great Depression, all income, tax revenue, and prices dropped. International trade decreased by more than 50%, and U.S. unemployment climbed to just above 25%. Industrial cities like Detroit and Pittsburgh took the heaviest hits. While the recession of 2008 was not as drastic, it affected the world economy and resulted in a global recession more so than ever before. The percent of U.S. citizens unemployed had reached 10% as of 2009. Along with the challenges unemployment presented, consumer
According to Inequality.org, “We equate wealth with ‘net worth,’ the sum total of your assets minus liabilities. Assets can include everything from an owned personal residence and cash in savings accounts to investments in stocks/bonds, real estate, and retirement accounts. Liabilities cover what a household owes: a car loan, credit card balance, student loan, mortgage, or any other bill yet to be paid. In the United States, wealth inequality runs even more pronounced than income inequality” (Wealth). Wealth disparity affects everyone in America. When the top twenty percent of earners in America take over fifty percent of total earnings in any given year, It can be see as very unfair by anyone who is in the middle class and especially the lower class of citizens in the U.S. It is safe to say that both sides of the political world (Republicans and Democrats) are equally worried about how economic inequality will affect their children and future generations. No matter who you ask, rich or poor, and whatever their opinion on the shape of economic distribution in America is, they most likely have a unrealistic sense of the state it is actually in.
During the Great Depression, many families were left poor with no income or savings. With manufacturing productions decreasing, prices
Americans today live in a distinctly unequal society. Inequality is now wider than it used to be in the last century, and the division in income, wages, and wealth are broader than they are in other developed economies of the world. Wealth inequality is the imbalance of wealth or income within a society, and it is one of the most vital economic challenge the US is facing today because the distribution of wealth is more dispersed, making the inequality in wealth distribution at its highest. While the matter has been discussed for many years, the actual income disparity in the U.S. has heightened and is now verging on an extreme gap that portends to impede long-term economic growth. The huge gap between the wealthy and poor is squeezing the U.S. economy, the wealth gap threatens economic growth by diminishing social mobility and producing a less-educated workforce who are not able to compete in the global economy. unrestrained level of income inequality causes political pressures, it discourages trade, investment, and hiring. The present level of income inequality in the U.S. is shrinking GDP growth, and the world's largest economy is struggling to recover from the Great Recession.
Uneven distribution of wealth serves as another cause of the Great Depression. America was wealthy in the 1920s, but this wealth did not extend to all segment of the society. The gains made by wealthy Americans in the 1920s far outstripped gained made by the working class. By the time of the stock market crash, the upper one percent of the population controlled over sixty percent of the nation’s savings. On the other hand, over three quarters of American families made less than $3000 a year. Problems that could develop from this situation were obvious. The bottom-line three-quarters of families were too poor to purchase much to help the economics to flourish. Underconsumption, in the long run, was a vicious circle to the economy. People had no money to spend. The income of many firms dwindled. More people were laid off or cut hours and thus further cut their spending. The economics became stagnant.
On top of it all the rich seem to get richer, spending their money on bigger houses, better cars, always trying to out do each other while the middle class continues to struggle. Paul Krugman describes this very well by saying,
Wealth is a privilege that too many people have. The top 20% of Americans owned 85% of the country's wealth and the bottom more of the population owned around 15 percent. The Recession also caused a drop in median household wealth , making the crack bigger between the upper and the lower class. The “debt-dependent economy,” has negative effects on the nation as a whole. But single families are suffering too.
In Robert Reich documentary “Inequality for All” he makes a compelling discussion about the serious crises that the United States faces due the widening economic gap. He looks to raise awareness of the U.S. economic gap between the rich and poor. According to Reich the widening divide in America is real and growing. Income levels at the middle and labor class is stagnant and are at it’s lowest levels compared to upper class incomes since the beginning of WWII and is growing wider each year. Reich suggests that the economy runs more smoothly when the middle class has jobs with fair wages, when unions are strong, and when middle class workers have some extra money to spend if possible when the government uses the tax policy properly and when it raises the minimum wage regularly to control the income gap between labor and management. In other words Reich argues that economically healthy middle and labor class equality is the foundation of a thriving economy and is necessary to maintaining a sound national infrastructure and educational system within
In the United States, high standard of living is not equally shared with in the Americans. The 1970s and 1990s was period where economic inequality began to grow. Emmanuel Saez, an economics professor at UC Berkeley has been doing a research for the U.S. income inequality. He states that there has been an increase since the 1970s, and has reached levels that have not been seen since 1928. “In 1928, the top 1% of families received 23.9% of all pretax income, while the bottom 90% received 50.7%. But the Depression and World War II dramatically reshaped the nation’s income distribution, by 1944 the top 1%’s share was down to 11.3%, while the bottom 90% were receiving 67.5%, levels that would remain more or less constant for the next three decades. But starting in the mid- to late 1970s, the uppermost percent income share began rising dramatically, while that of the bottom 90% started to fall.”(DeSilver) Ever since then, economic inequality continues to increase, especially in the last three decades.