preview

Case Study Fractile's Purchasing Power

Decent Essays

Now, compare which fractile’s purchasing power went up during that period with changes in the purchasing powers of the years 1973 to 2000 found in Fig 8. The top one-hundredth percent fractile’s purchasing power went up 7.27 times what it was in 1960. The trend continues with the next nine-hundredth percent fractile. They saw an increase of 3.55 times of what their purchasing power was in 1960. The next four-tenth percent fractile also saw an increase in their purchasing power. Their purchasing power was 2.14 times higher than it was in 1960. The next five-tenth percent fractile’s purchasing power went up 1.72 times higher than it was in 1960 as well. As for the next four percent fractile, their purchasing power went up 1.43 times higher than it was in 1960. The five percent fractile after them went up also, 1.26 times what it was in 1960. The only fractile that lost purchasing power was the bottom ninety. They had 0.95 times the purchasing power they had in 1960. So we can see from Fig 7, that to get out of the great depression the purchasing power of the top fractiles decreased while the bottom ninety percent fractile's purchasing power increased. It is also clear from Fig 8 that, before the great recession that trend went through a dramatic …show more content…

” would be No. the income and wealth inequality levels are higher now than they were before the great depression. Also, if the formula out of an economic crisis is raising the spending power of the bottom ninety percent fractile, the recent economic trends foreshadow yet another economic crisis. Since, “95% of income gains since 2009 have accrued to the top 1%” (Barro). And even, “Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen, who has noted that even if the lower class has access to more economic resources, the trend of a growing income inequality gap will continue to exist as long as the higher class amasses more wealth”

Get Access