preview

Carol Cruz Summary

Decent Essays

Rating systems serve as a great tools in ideal situations, but very rarely do we get ideal situations. The idea of a rating system is to give definite values to each object in a particular family such as Truman College being an object of the College/University family. Higher values usually represent good ratings which is equivocal to saying that an object with a high rating is above average compared to the other objects of that family. There is usually a threshold in which the rating can be classified as below or above average. Regardless, having a rating system allows the users of that system to objectively say “this object is better than this other object.” Of course this is always never the case because we do not live in an ideal world. …show more content…

Cruz discusses his support for a rating systems for universities and colleges in his article titled First Step to Deeper Reforms. Cruz’s main argument states that the “federal government should rate colleges and universities on measures of access, success and affordability” because he believes that it would “drive states, institutions and students towards the transformative change needed to tame rising debt and jump-start social mobility.” Cruz’s idea is logical. His idea applies values to colleges and universities that are tangible and would give the public a baseline that they can use to choose which of these institutions are best for them. On paper, Cruz’s idea is inviting but it does not come without caveats as explained in the article against a rating …show more content…

In Rating Could Have Unintended Consequences Bastedo argues that “there are widespread examples of gaming and manipulation by colleges in the data they provide” thus hindering the credibility of any rating system. Furthermore, Bastedo proposes that the “pressure on institutions will be enormous” and will undoubtedly lead to some of these institutions to choose “unethical paths.” This is a natural response to a situation like this as any entity backed into a corner will utilize any means necessary for their survival. Reinforcing Bastedo’s argument is his claim that gathering the data would be a logistical nightmare in that the data available currently is of varying quality. To employ a rating system with current data would thus yield unreliable results. In essence, it does not appear Bastedo is definitively against the idea of a rating system but rather he is against diving in headfirst into employing a system when we have not yet learned of all its

Get Access