Carney, Cudd, And Yap: Article Analysis

What sort of language does the writer use? Do the words imply sensationalism or conclusive findings? Phrases such as “startling revelation” or “now we know” or “the study proved” are clues to whether the report is a sensational one. Does the author take a tentative approach, using words such as may, might, or could? What do these words imply?

Morris, J., & Song, L. (2013, September 16). Study Delivers Good News, Bad News on

Justin Ruoff is an American Football Conference (AFC) North analyst for Today’s Pigskin, a football-specific news website. He creates opinion-based articles on AFC North football teams and individual players. He also communicates with editors and his supervisor via email to discuss article ideas. His job can be particularly stressful because he must deliver insightful and clear articles on strict deadlines.

The article “The Case for Fitting In” compares to my idea of conformity because I think that it means how you change your opinion due to social pressure. My idea of conformity relates to the article because it was talking about how when people were in a group and someone said the wrong answer they usually went with it. “Each subject saw 18 sets of lines, and the group answer was wrong for 12 of them” this proves that most of the time people went with the group rather than going with their personal opinion. I think that the article really compares with my definition of conformity because I think that it causes you to change your opinion and sometimes causes you to choose wrong answers. I also strongly think that the article agrees with me because

Evidence-based practice is an approach used by health care professionals to continually use current best evidence-based research to make ethical and reliable decisions regarding patient care. “Research to promote evidence-based practice is becoming more and more a part of the regular work of health care leaders” (Grand Canyon University, 2015, p. 1). However, it is important to determine the difference between solid research and flawed research that provides unreliable inferences. Evidence-based research includes focusing on a clinical question; and includes the review and incorporation of several studies to strengthen the results of the new study (Grand Canyon University, 2015). Roddy et al. and Ganz et al. articles will be assessed to determine if the recommended changes were backed by solid research that warrants changes in a hospital.

The focus of this particular research paper was to prove or disprove the theory that testosterone levels would rise based on the presence of a toy gun. The independent variable consisted of a pellet gun identical to a Desert Eagle handgun for the experimental subjects and the Mouse Trap children’s game for the control subjects. The dependent variable was the amount of hot sauce each test subject placed into individual cups for the next test subjects. The population studied for this research were 30 male college students willing to provide saliva samples. The procedures that were followed were simplistic. Each of the men provided

How can an actor improve? Well while referring to Geoff Colvin’s article our focus is on the main importance of how to be great. One way you can become great through acting, is by practicing every day, but not any ordinary practice, but deliberate mind stressing hard work. For example by practicing in front of groups of people the actor will have better confidence on the stage. The actor will also need to recite their lines so that they know them. Another example for reciting your lines could be, having someone read the lines before yours, and then you could recite the lines after listening to that person, and every time you mess up you can have them reread your lines until you can recite them without looking at your lines, and without making

The first, and maybe most important, mistake made by these researchers was the fact that they did not tell their research subjects what was actually happening. They were promised treatment, but instead were not treated at all. Public health services even went to extreme lengths to make sure the subjects

Cohen’s article is a reminder to be careful when reviewing research. This article shows how not all research is true and people put their faith into what they want the research to mean. It is damaging to the progression of psychology as a science if researchers do not claim something as significant for being true. We do this by claiming something is significant because that is what NHST says, and

I believe that their findings are valid because of the many other studies that have produced similar results. The researchers were also careful in their selection of participants as evidenced by

1.) Summary: At an official TED Conference, Amy Cuddle, who is a social psychologist, gives an inspiring lecture called “Your Body Shapes Who You Are.” Throughout the lecture, Ms. Cuddle stresses that we a fascinated with the body language of ourselves and others in nature. These nonverbal behaviors give rise to judgements between peers, and make us become influenced by these types of behaviors, for instance, when you feel as if you are powerful, “…you make yourself big, you stretch out, you take up space, you're basically opening up. It's about opening up.” As Amy Cuddle discusses within her lecture, there is a direct correlation between the amount of testosterone and cortisol powerful individuals have compared to the low power. High power

Almost every night, my parents would tell me to sit up straight when we were eating at the dinner table, and they would say it would help me digest. Also, in high school when I would walk through the halls between classes, many of my friends would compliment me on my posture. I thought it was the strangest thing to compliment someone on. The title “Your Body Language Shapes Who You Are,” brought back these memories; therefore, I was interested to see what Amy Cuddy had to say. Cuddy is a social psychologist and a business professor at Princeton. In the TED Talk “Your Body Language Shapes Who You Are,” Amy Cuddy discusses the reasons to use power posing, and it could affect the mind for better success in our lives.

She also studied philosophy and trained as a non-medical practitioner. She was a student at the University of Hamburg in Germany. Another researcher in this article is Urs M. Nater, he is a Lichtenberg Professor of Clinical Biopsychology in the University of Marburg in Germany. He has also won several awards and prices involving the studies he has carried out. In addition to the article there is another author in the study, his name is Dr. Johannes AC Laferton. He has a PhD in clinical psychology and he is also a research assistant in the field of behavioral therapy at the University of Berlin. They wanted to conduct this because they wanted to see if the study would aim at clarifying the role of stress beliefs in somatic symptom reports. They were investigating for the first time whether negative stress beliefs would predict somatic symptom disorder. This study was conducted in a German University involving both German men and women between the ages of 20 and 30. All of the students volunteered in the study and were all young and healthy individuals with a high socioeconomic status. The study began in the beginning of the semester at the school, as well as the end of the

Social psychologist, Amy Cuddy in her persuasive and informative TED Talk, “Fake It Till You Make It,” claims that if you change your power posture for two minutes, your outcomes are bound to change. She supports her claim by stating that “our bodies change our minds, our minds change our behaviour, and our behaviour changes our outcome,” then illustrates graphs of series of test done, proving that cortisol decreases while testosterone increases. For example, Cuddy showed an experiment on where someone who has low confidence was less likely to gamble compared with someone who is full of confidence, those with confidence, their testosterone increases significantly. Finally Cuddy advised the audience

Consistency: Repeated observation of an association in a different population under different circumstances showing the same results suggests that the results of a single study are not due to chance.