preview

Carlson Disabled Child

Decent Essays

In the article “The Life of a Disabled Child, From Taunts to Hate Crimes” in The New York Times Margaret Carlson uses pathos, logos, ethos and kairos to appeal to her readers about the pain that disabled children and their families feel because the segregation of disabled people is still occurring. Carlson wrote this article right after the Chicago hate crime to raise awareness about how disabled people are treated unfairly and why we need to protect them. Although Carlson includes many convincing emotional appeals in her article to connect with her readers through use of her personal narrative and the narrative of the Chicago attack. Carlson fails to add hard evidence and credibility which causes the reader to doubt her knowledge about the …show more content…

Carlson then mentions the attack in Chicago and how the four African Americans attacked and tortured their white victim because he was different (2). Carlson then mentions the devastation that the family felt and how it might be a comfort to some that the four attackers got heightened penalties, but it is not comforting to her family (4). Carlson describes her childhood with her brother Jimmy and how they made life easier for Jimmy. Carlson points out that growing up with a disabled brother was not easy and she also stated “I didn’t love it, and could have done with less “Little House On the Prairie” and more alone time”.(6) Carlson points out why people feel like they need to pick on the weak and she even found herself guilty of being cruel. She points out that when Jimmy was a kid that he would constantly get picked on and it's even harder to prevent when disabled children become older. She mentions that when she got older she began to take care of her brother and she realized that Jimmy didn’t know proper social edict, which made people judge him. Carlson concludes the article by pointing out how difficult taking care of Jimmy was by stating, “ I thought I knew my parents’ heartache but didn’t have a glimmer”. (11) Carlson also points out how it is politically correct to protect the weak because it necessary to keep them safe from …show more content…

The only evidence that Carlson uses is through her own narratives and personal experiences with her brother and the Chicago incident. With only one example of logos it makes it hard to see that her argument is logical and that we can trust it. Carlson also fails to backup her claims with supporting evidence for example, Carlson states “All the progress that has been made saves parents today some of the sorrow my parents endured when they could get only so much help in the 1960’s” (5). This is ineffective because Carlson does not explain what happened in the 1960’s with disabled children or why it is easier taking care of a disabled child now. There is many more instances where Carlson fails to support her claims. Another example on how Carlson does not support her claims is when she states “taunting and bullying remain an epidemic for children with intellectual disabilities”(8) and “the older the child the harder it is to prevent” (9). Carlson does not explain why bullying happens to children with intellectual disabilities. She also does not explain why it happens more with older children. This also would have been a good time for Carlson to add statics on how many disabled kids are actually bullied and the age that they are bullied the most. Since Carlson did not add more information to her claims it is hard to trust what she is saying is

Get Access