Rsm 332 Study Guide

This case attempts to tackle two approaches in real asset valuation: Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis and the issues surrounding such, as well as the Black-Scholes

This document is authorized for use only by Yen Ting Chen in FInancial Markets and Institutions taught by Nawal Ahmed Boston University from September 2014 to December 2014.

Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jordan, B. D. (Eds.). (2011). Essentials of corporate finance (7th ed., Rev.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

The company’s objective is to improve its competitive position in deep-discount brokerage. In order to achieve this objective, the company must grow its customer base, requiring an investment of $100 million to upgrade its technological capabilities as well as an increase of $155 million for its advertisement budget. In order to evaluate the company’s cost of capital, we used the Cost Asset Pricing Model. Since the company went public recently, it would not be an accurate assessment of the risk of

Valuation is the estimation of an asset’s value, whether real or financial, based on variables perceived to be related to future investment returns, on comparison with similar assets, or, when relevant, on estimates of immediate liquidation proceeds (Pinto, Henry, Robinson, Stowe; 2010). Correct valuation of real assets can present challenges to financial analysts. Different models can be used to arrive at the closest estimate of value and yet certain issues will always arise. This case attempts to tackle two approaches in real asset valuation: Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis and the issues surrounding such, as well as the Black-Scholes Model for Real Options. Questions to be addressed in the study are:

‘The Capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is a very useful model and it is used widely in the industry even though it is based on very strong assumptions. Discuss in the light of recent developments in the area.’

This summary provides a brief overview of Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) as an alternative method for estimating expected returns. This paper also discusses the positive and negative effects of CAPM along with the risks of Beta and why this model has its share of drawbacks and critics in the marketplace. The first section will cover the basics of CAPM including its flaws and rewards. Next, the risks of beta and the strengths and weaknesses are discussed in conjunction with its relevance to CAPM and why it’s important to investors who are willing to take greater risks. Finally, an application is provided to show how beta affects CAPM from a financial manager’s perspective.

The course project involved developing a great depth of knowledge in analyzing capital structure, theories behind it, and its risks and issues. Before I began this assignment, I knew nothing but a few things about capital structure from previous unit weeks; however, it was not until this course’s final project that came along with opening

Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is an arithmetical theory that describes the relationship between risk and return in a balanced market. The Capital Assets Pricing Model was autonomously and simultaneously developed by William Sharpe, Jan Mossin, and John Litner. The researches of these founders were published in three different and highly respected journal articles between 1964 and 1966. Since its inception, the model has been used in various applications that range from public utility rates to corporate capital budgeting. However, the initial introduction of the model was characterized by suspicious view from the investment community. This was largely because CAPM apparently indicated that professional investment management was hugely a waste of time. Due to its implementation problems and shortcomings associated with its relation to Arbitrage Pricing Theory, Capital Asset Pricing Model has continued to face constant academic attacks.

The capital asset pricing model, also called CAPM, is created by William Sharpe, John Lintner, Jack Treynor and Jan Mossin in 1964, aiming to study the decision process of security price in the market. With proper assumptions on investors’ behavior, the capital asset pricing model pays the most attention to the exploration of quantified relationship between security return and the risk. However, academic community is turning away from the classical model and tries to analyze the relationship with other tools. This essay will mainly discuss the reasons why academic community is avoiding the CAPM. In addition, the relationship between risk and return will firstly be explained. More details on fundamental features of the CAPM will be given out. Empirical evidence will be adopted to illustrate the CAPM.

This solutions manual provides the answers to all the review questions and end-of-chapter problems in Financial Management: Principles and Practice, by Timothy Gallagher. The answers and the steps taken to obtain the answers are shown. Readers are reminded that in finance there is often more than one answer to a question or to a problem, depending on one‘s viewpoint and assumptions. One answer is

Asset pricing takes a vital role in the literature of finance. It forms a cornerstone for participants trying to manifest intrinsic/predicted values/prices for assets. Since 1965, when Sharpe introduced his CAPM formula, the field of asset pricing had shifted to a new paradigm. The model of Sharpe suggested that market beta as a variable is sufficient to explain stock returns. Sharpe’s work was preceded by Markowitz (1959) portfolio theory, where the lack of computer power at that time makes the calculations of huge set of covariance between stocks an inflexible approach. From this perspective, accompanied with simple and strong theoretical grounds, the CAPM gained high credit.

You submitted this Assignment on Sun 7 Jul 2013 10:22 AM PDT (UTC -0700). You got a score of 90.00 out of 100.00.

The Capital Asset Pricing Model (“CAPM”) was introduced by Sharpe (1964), Lintner (1965) and Mossin (1966) to provide investor an understanding in relation to the expected returns of their investment. However, this theory has been criticised by some empirical models resulted from the unrealistic assumptions. This paper will critically analyse the limitation of the CAPM and will discuss Arbitrage Pricing Theory (“APT”) and Fama-French (“FF”) Three-Factor Model (“TFM”) as the possible alternative empirical approaches.

The second session of this internship introduced me to the concept of stock valuation. Here I was assigned my first project to verify, amend and update records concerning stock options. I was also taught the concept behind stock reevaluation and its advantages before a company decides to go public. I was also introduced to methods and formulas used to track stock vesting periods.