The book “Call of the Wild” is told to be “a modern classic”. Some say that “Call of the Wild” should be banned in most school and libraries, including MMS. I believe that “Call of the Wild” should not be banned from schools because it shows how you should act your inner self, it shows leadership, and overcoming adversity through the dog Buck and connect to everyday lives. These traits are shown throughout the book and can intertwine with the lives of teens. “Call of the Wild” should not be banned because it shows leadership throughout the book. It first shows this through Buck gaining the place as the lead dog, “Buck kills spitz to take his place as the lead dog”. Most would understand this is a form of leadership, but not as killing. This connects by showing to out work others, you will succeed. In life, you aren't always given what you want, like how Buck didn't want to get sold. Buck shows another sign of the trait leadership, through attacking those who killed his …show more content…
Buck’s owner had died and he visited the sight of his death before living on as a wolf, “but every year he returns to the place Thornton died, to mourn his master before returning to his life in the wild”. Everyone has lost someone in their lives. It’s just a part of life, just how Buck treats it like a real human being, but then goes back to his life as a wolf. Buck also overcomes the adversity of the abusive owners. Buck tries to fight the owners off but gets suffocated,”Then the rope tightened mercilessly, while Buck struggled in a fury, his tongue lolling out of his mouth”. Buck is overcoming the harsh and abusive conditions of these owners. We go through times in our lives that are tough like Buck. Some say that the abusive manner towards the dogs is too much. But, it shows how much Buck has changed through the book, how he has become stronger, and how we treat dogs
The first reason this is the theme in The Call of the Wild is that the man in the red sweater treated Buck poorly so Buck Didn’t like him. In the novel, after Buck is sold, the man in the red sweater beats Buck with a club. Because of this beating Buck dislikes him. Also in the novel Buck watches the man in the red sweater beat a dog to death. Due to the man’s treatment towards the dogs there, Buck is disloyal towards the man. This shows that the man in
The Call Of The Wild starts off with our protagonist Buck being kidnapped, by Manuel, at his home in San Diego. Manuel takes Buck to The Man in The Red Sweater who teaches him the Law of Club and Fang. Buck soon gets to know all of his pack and the leader Spitz soon becomes his rival. Soon the two dogs fight, and Buck kills Spitz becoming the leader of his pack. After this Perrault and Francois sell the pack of dogs to a
I picked this quote from chapter 6 and it explains the tension building up inside of Buck during his time with John Thornton, who is the ideal master, and his relationship with Buck represents a perfect friendship between a dog and their owner. The author tells us that this is the first time that Buck has loved a human. Yet it is clear that Buck is supposed to free in the wild, so Buck doesn’t know whether to stay with his owner or go free into the wild. But after Thornton is killed and he avenges his death he has no more reasons to not go into the wild where he truly belongs.
Banning a book is when a person or group takes away a book from the public or a majority group (Wilson, 844). Books taken from the public are mostly banned for its materials or controversial topics, however, a handful of novels were able to avoid being taken off shelves. A novel that was able to avoid this is Slaughterhouse-Five, the book is banned in schools around the United States and the reason for this is sexual situations, violent content, and strong language within the story, but a majority of schools currently allow it (Paulson, 07A). However, this novel shouldn’t be banned because people have freedom to read, content shouldn’t be filtered or controlled and any topic should be free to the public.
One of the main reasons I’m sure you want to ban this book is because of the profanity used in it. Yes, there is a lot of foul language use in this book, but when you think about it kids are used to hearing people cuss, and reading it is a lot less worse than hearing them or saying them in my opinion. The cuss words add a lot of character to the book to be honest, it sets the mood a lot of times. It would not be fair for someones who is older and more mature to not be able to read it because some little kid can’t be serious about it.
First, Buck has to fight off one hundred huskies. For example, Buck tries to escape the camp with Spitz. Since, he doesn’t want to be killed by the starving dogs. Second, Buck and the other dogs know Dave has been put down. For instance, the dogs know he has been killed and they are scared. Since, they are all sad, but they are glad it was not them being put down. Last, Buck and the team eat too much and might not be able to stand the cold weather. For example, the dogs could die in the cold. Since, the food makes them full and unable to get up and move around. In conclusion, Buck furthers his knowledge of kill or be killed.
The book that I have selected is “The Call of the Wild” by Jack London, written in 1903. It is his most widely read, enjoyed, and not enjoyed book. It is banned for many reasons such as animal cruelty and just plain violence. Buck was kidnapped from his home to become a part of a dog sled team involved with the Klondike Gold rush. I agree and disagree and with the book being banned. I have a strong belief that it should be up to the parents for what their child/children can and cannot read. They parents should have their own say not having to listen to the restrictions.
There have been many books written by many people and some have been the world's most popular books but there have been other books that have been banned because of it’s content and it’s significance. One of the many books that have been banned was the book The Call of the Wild by Jack London. Many people believe that The Call of the Wild should not be banned because of the realistic events and for Buck influential character but the book should be banned. The Call of the Wild should be banned because it shows so much violence and it has shown it Dranism views to the public as well as his social views and wanting his book to be written more for his benefit than that of the people.
Manuel kidnaps Buck and sells him to pay off a debt. Buck’s trustworthy nature changes as soon as he is beaten and is not fed or allowed to drink water. When Buck arrives in Seattle he is almost beaten to death by the man in the red sweater. "He saw, once for all, that he stood no chance against a man with a club." (Call of the Wild, page 19). Buck learns from this horrible incident the ‘law of the club.’ The law of the club states that a dog is no match for a man with a weapon. Buck witnesses as his newly-made friend named Curly is torn to pieces by thirty or forty huskies after she falls to the ground from fighting. Buck is taught the ‘law of the fang’ from Curly’s death scene. The law of the fang recognizes the fact that once a dog falls to the ground he is dead. In the north, Buck learns many traits that will help him journey through the north in order to survive. Buck learns that he has to eat his food quickly in order to not have it stolen; he learns to steal food to survive, because the daily ration cannot fill his stomach; he learns to break the ice out from his toes; and finally Buck learns that in order to stay warm during the harsh, freezing nights, he has to make a ‘nest’ to sleep in. Because Buck learns these new secrets of the sled dogs, he is able to survive in the north and to maintain his
The Call of the Wild, on the surface, is a story about Buck, a four- year old dog that is part Shepherd and part St. Bernard. More importantly, it is a naturalistic tale about the survival of the fittest in nature. Throughout the novel, Buck proves that he is fit and can endure the law of the club, the law of the fang, and the laws of nature.
In schools and counties all over, the book The Call of the Wild is being banned from 8th grade curriculum. For reasons such as that the book is based on true events, that the book describes actions of animal abuse that still occur today, and that banning books causes illiteracy and it caused by illiteracy, I do not believe that The Call of the Wild should be taken out of 8th grade curriculum.
But, some can be inappropriate and that is not good or okay. I would agree when some parents wouldn’t want their kids to read The Call of the Wild. It is a little violent, but I don’t think that a parent should be concerned about a teenager reading this book. I know for a fact that students have heard worse outside of the classroom; parents know that as well. So I don’t see why they should ban the book, it is just what is going on in life. The author is putting it in a different perspective; in the perspective of a dog. The dog, Buck, is noticing what is going on in the world not only just around his own life at home. He sees what it is like outside and in a whole other world. Buck is traded and goes to Alaska and sees what is around him. Buck is like the average teenager seeing the world in a whole new
The struggle for survival is a major point throughout Buck’s journey. From the very beginning Buck learns to lose his morals to survive. He learns to steal food without getting caught and how to kill other dogs. He learns to appease the dogs drivers as well as other dogs by following “The Law of Club and Fang”. He learns how to endure the brutal environment. However Buck doesn't just want to just survive the Northland, he wants to conquer it.
The story has a significant point about how the desire for animals to inhabit in the nature in which they belong in should be expressed. The theme of this story is that things that long for the wild, should be in the wild, or things that want to be civilized, should be civilized. The central conflict of the novel is that Buck wished to fulfil his life in the wild, but he had difficulties getting to that point. The story has a strong and precise beginning, middle, and end, which readers usually appreciate. The novel has a great way of showing the development and change of Buck and the other characters. The story could’ve been improved by changing “man” to “human” when referencing people in general. Women existed at that time, but London only wrote the term “man.” The Call of the Wild is a well put together novel that has a significant theme, and an intriguing
“Censorship is the child of fear and the father of ignorance” by Lorraine Halse Anderson. This quote means that when you ban a book one is a person who is in fear and only leads other to stay ignorant to the literature out there. I agree with this quote because one should if we ban these books we show that we are in fear of what the reader might do after the book is read but when you deprive other people from reading literature because it has been banned you leave other to be ignorant to the literature of other. The book The Call of the Wild by Jack London is a book that shows that people live in fear and lead other to be ignorant on what was happening.