Cadbury Crush Case Essay

Gatorade is a flagship brand of PepsiCo and has a commanding 75% market share of the sports nutrition beverage marketplace globally, being sold into 80 different countries according to the latest PepsiCo annual report published in late 2011. Gatorade's success in branding and product marketing has actually expanded the global market for sports nutrition beverages during the late 1990s and into the 21rst century. Recently however the company has faced many channels including product line extensions of the last decade which failed to deliver strong results (Pollack, 1997) and a more critical analysis of their ingredients as many of their beverages are sold in public schools (Tallon, 2009). Despite these challenges however, Gatorade continues to experience strong market share and growth. The intent of this analysis is to evaluate and provide recommendations for each of the four areas of the marketing mix including product, price, promotion and place or distribution.

In 1885, at a drugstore in Waco Texas, a man by the name of Wade Morrison had hired Charles Alderton. Alderton was a pharmacist but he also served soft drinks to his customers. Back in that time there weren’t as many soft drink selections to choose from so Alderton would often combine sweeteners with fruit extracts. He had invented many different flavors. However one flavor sold better than

Meijer Superstore, Speedway, and Walgreens are the locations used at the center of research to compare and contrast several brands of single serving-size, refrigerated, water and tea. During this exploration, the marketing mix; product, price, placement, and promotion were observed among the several brands. Coca-Cola will benefit from the research where unique observations emerged. These observations include the placement of flavoring drops to add to water, the availability of Vitamin Water in both the water and sport drink sections, and the price and placement of PepsiCo products vs. Coca-Cola products, which included both water and tea, in the Meijer Superstore.

Kelly Kretz is the marketing manager of Vincor’s refreshment business in Canada. In October of 2005, she is faced with demands of various new product launches. Not only does she have to manage the leading cooler brand portfolio, but also work on Project Twist. The gist of this project entails launching a new alcoholic beverage to the refreshment market. Deciding on the product characteristics, positioning, branding, packaging and distribution strategy is what follows next.

According to my venture report buyer recognition's towards soda pops developed more grounded than any time in recent memory from the pesticide sullying discussion in late 2003, and the early rainstorm in mid-2004 in numerous locales of India, that at one point debilitated to crash development in 2014. Reacting to a progression of activities all through 2004, for example, diminishing pack sizes, presenting new flavors, expanding purposes of offer, situating on the present wellbeing blast and talking point of preference of changing customer inclinations, the aggregate volume of soda pops sold in 2014-15 surpassed four billion liters, enrolling a strong rate of 18%

Hawaiian Punch has much less control over the sale and distribution of the brand in the direct to store network and sold much less in volume, but does receive very high gross margin contribution after marketing. This network accounts for only eighteen percent of total brand sales but contributes forty-one percent of the gross contribution of the brand. The target market is also different from the finished goods network. In the direct to store model the target market is households with children six to seventeen years old, focusing on teenagers. This needs to continue since this category, carbonated soft drinks, is over twenty-eight percent of the total beverage market and has been growing in both volume and market share. By being in this distribution network, it allows for not only additional sales but the ability to target a different market segment, the teenage; who most likely drank Hawaiian Punch from the juice aisle and now will choose it from the carbonated drinks aisle.

Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. is the company which produces the brand Squirt. “Squirt is a caffeine-free, low sodium carbonated soft drink brand with a distinctive blend of grapefruit juices that gives it a tangy, fresh citrus taste. Squirt is the best selling carbonated grapefruit soft drink brand in the U.S.” (Kerin and Peterson, 2010) Kate Cox, the brand manager responsible for Squirt believes that market targeting and product positioning are key elements in Squirt’s advertising and promotional plan development. This case study will provide a summary and analysis of Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc.’s options and the examination into the company’s strengths, weaknesses, threats, and opportunities.

In an industry dominated by two heavyweight contenders, Coke and Pepsi, in fact, between 1996 and 2004 per capita consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) remained between 52 to 54 gallons per year. Consumption grew by an average of 3% per year over the next three decades. Fueling this growth were the increasing availability of CSD, the introduction of diet and flavored varieties, and brand extensions. There is couple of reasons why the industry is so profitable such as market share, availability and diversity and brand name and world class marketing.

Since the best way to segment the soft drink industry is through different age groups. The analysis of the research shows that about

The case explains the economics of the soft drink industry. There activities that add value to consumer at nearly every stage of the value chain of the soft drink industry. The war is primarily fought between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo as market leaders in this industry; who combined have roughly a ninety percent market share in their industry. The impact of globalization on competition has allowed both of these major players to find new markets to tap which has allowed each continued growth potential.

Analysis of the Cadbury Business The person, who created the Cadbury business, is John Cadbury in 1824. The business started as a shop in a fashionable place in Birmingham. It sold things such as tea and coffee, mustard and a new sideline - cocoa and drinking chocolate, which John Cadbury prepared himself using a mortar and pestle. In 1847 the Cadbury business became a partnership. This is because John Cadbury took his brother, which also made it a family business.

Pepsi-Cola is a carbonated beverage that is produced and manufactured by PepsiCo. It is sold in stores, restaurants and from vending machines. The drink was first made in the 1890s by pharmacist Caleb Bradham in New Bern, North Carolina. The brand was trademarked on June 16, 1903. There have been many Pepsi variants produced over the years since 1903, including Diet Pepsi, Crystal Pepsi, Pepsi Twist, Pepsi Max, Pepsi Samba, Pepsi Blue, Pepsi Gold, Pepsi Holiday Spice, Pepsi Jazz, Pepsi X (available in Finland and Brazil), Pepsi Next (available in Japan and South Korea), Pepsi Raw, Pepsi Retro in Mexico, Pepsi One, and Pepsi Ice Cucumber in Japan .Pepsi cola is situated is an Industry that is dominator by two Competitors Coca

The change in the consumers' taste is another key trend in the industry. Many substitutes to carbonated soft drinks gained more popularity among consumers. Exhibit 5 shows an increase in the consumption of bottled water from 11.8 in 1998 to 13.2 gallons/capita in 2000, and that of juices from 10 to 10.4 gallons/capita at the expense of

The last two topics within Porter’s Five Force Analysis are the threats of substitutes and new entries. The threat of substitutes for PepsiCo and Pepsi products could be considered quite high. In recent years, Americans have been cutting back soda consumption, approximately 1.2% in 2015, and 0.9% in 2014 (Taylor, 2016). Customers have been replacing soft drinks, in particular, with water, coffees, and all natural juices. This also leads the way for the threat of new entries. As people are tending to lean away from traditional soft drinks, the threat of new entrants could be considered moderate. This is because the cost of entry is relatively low as it is not a technology driven industry. Most of the cost of entry would be related to branding and marketing of the new product (Thompson, 1996). In recent years many competitors have entered the market with desirable ingredients and non-soft-drink beverages.

I’m an undergraduate student majoring in economy prepared the marketing plan for the purpose of learning and experience.