preview

Brazil Government Essay

Satisfactory Essays

6. The roles of the military in the governments in Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico had some similarities and differences. First starting out with Brazil, military dictators had played a major role in their governments fro about twenty years. Brazil was ruled by military dictators. This dictators, put importance on the economy growing, and they promoted some foreign investments. They showed this by beginning large projects that were located in the Amazon jungle. Because of these actions, the economy now did just as they hoped that it would. How every this economic advancements did have a couple negatives. Now, the governments stopped the wages, and they also held back on the social events. This then caused a downgrade in the standards of the normal …show more content…

Along with this, they were imprisoned, tortured, and in some cases killed. Therefore, as expected, opposition to this form of military rule was caused more and more. Than in Mexico, the military's part in the government was very different from just mentioned of Brazils. There's was different because Mexico elected generals as their president. These men now did not rule as military dictators, like in Brazil. They had one major party instead, the National Revolutionary Party, as it was called. This party dominated throughout Mexico through the remaining part of the 20th century. A president of theirs was Lázaro Cárdenas, and he worked towards things such as making life better for workers and peasants. He worked towards the things that seemed a little more to actually mattering, and he nationalized the Mexican oil industry too. He then created a state-run oil industry instead. Then moving on to the military's role in the government in Argentina. Similar to Brazil, Argentina was ruled by the military. Although at one point, the generals did seize power, it was a dictatorship that was established—and it was a brutal

Get Access