preview

Brassica Juncea Experiment

Decent Essays

It depends on where the toxin is being dumped in/onto that concludes whether my plant is a good or bad bioremediator--making it inconclusive. It may work better when it comes to cleaning up toxins from the water, but not as good as it would on land. I don’t have enough results to confirm my claim(but I have enough to support it), so I'll need to conduct more experiments to actually confirm my claim just so that I am thorough. From the data in the graph in the results section, it showed that the Juncea plant with the toxins in the water actually didn’t die and actually grew, but if you look at my plant with the toxins in the soil it ended up dying on day number 12. This made me think: does the Brassica Juncea be a better option to clean up toxins depending where the toxin is dumped on/into. …show more content…

The three species she tested were: Nigra, Rapa, and Juncea. After she blended each species she used these zinc test strips that tells you how much zinc was consumed by each plant using a scale of ppm(parts per million). The type of species I used consumed about 2 ppm, though it did look to be between 0 ppm and 2 ppm. It is debatable whether the test trip came out white or a light shade of pink. Due to my plant dying, I can infer that it was possible that the Juncea plant with the toxin in the water reservoir actually took up the toxins, but it’s not really sure if it was the toxin-water plant or the toxin-soil plant due to both being blended together. Thus supporting my claim about the plant being a good or bad bioremediator depending where the toxin is

Get Access