preview

Boston Marathon Bombing Analysis

Decent Essays

On April 15, 2013, at the Boston Marathon finish line two bombs went off at 2:49 about 12 seconds apart. 264 people were wounded and 3 spectators were killed, 29-year-old Krystle Campbell, 8-year-old Martin Richard, and 23-year-old Lu Lingzi. At least 16 people lost their legs the youngest amputee being 7-year-old Jane Richard (“Boston Marathon Bombings”). The two responsible for this horrible act are the brothers, Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dzhokar Tsarnaev.
The older brother Tamerlan Tsarnaev was a former boxer and had a wife and young child. He was born in the Former Soviet Republic of Kyrgyzstan in 1986. The younger brother Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was a sophomore at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth. He was born in 1993, also in The Former Soviet Republic of Kyrgyzstan. Apparently, the way the boys had been acting before the bombing was not unusual, but some behavioral changes were noticed. “Anzor and Zubeidat were given several warnings that Tamerlan was headed for trouble. Sometime between 2007 and 2009, Tamerlan and Zubeidat turned to religion. Zubeidat became observant, but Tamerlan became intolerant and hostile. He pushed his strict views on the rest of the family, causing tensions. When his sister married a non-Muslim, Tamerlan …show more content…

“For an act to be considered terrorism, however, there must be a political ideology behind it. As defined by the U.S. government in the U.S. Code, terrorism is “premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets.” Therefore, if the Boston attack was perpetrated by a single person (or a group of people) with no known political motivations, it cannot legitimately be called “terrorism,” even though it created a truly “terrifying” situation. What’s more, as Mediaite points out, prematurely labeling an event as an act of terror can unnecessarily alarm the American public and give an inflated sense of power to the perpetrators” (Stuart,

Get Access