Body Cameras Pros And Cons

Law enforcement agencies have been in a heated debate in the use of body cams by the surrounding communities because of the use of force incidents that have occurred in the media. Body cameras are the new age technology that allows law enforcement agencies to record encounters with the community. There are some positives aspects of law enforcement wearing body cams. The body cam allows the officer to interact with residents which will help to eliminate complaints about police behavior and the use of force encounters. The body cam gives video evidence of the decisions made by on-duty law enforcement in violent situations. This helps keep accountability of law enforcement and the ensure that the department and decreases liability. Because the

Across the country a growing number of legislative departments have been debating about the pros and cons of police body cameras. This paper will further explore benefits, as well as the downfalls of using such devices. This paper will also look at specific cases and examine whether or not body cameras were helpful in various situations. It will examine if they were a deterrent in cases dealing with police brutality and domestic violence. It also looks at how they could be misused and assisting some officers in covering up their corrupt behavior.

In today 's society, one highly debatable topic is whether or not law enforcement agents should wear body cameras. Most cameras used by law enforcement agencies across the country record audio and video, therefore, the cameras see and hear nearly everything a law enforcement officer does. There are many advantages to law enforcement personnel using body cameras while on duty because it holds the officers accountable, is used to document the contact made between the officers and the victims and/or suspects, supports the “use of force” action, keeps the officers and citizens honest, and the videos can even be used for training for other officers.

Video Footage has the potential to expose officer misconduct and exonerate civilians whose actions have been falsely accused by officers. In the case of John Crawford III, going into his local Walmart, just wanting to spend quality time with his family roasting s’mores. Officers had over 200 video cameras showing he wasn’t doing anything wrong, but they refused to look at them. Even though he had an unloaded pellet gun that he picked up off the shelf. Why shoot, instead of tasering him. (Harvard Law Review N.A., 2015). Even with some witnesses around that still didn’t stop New York Police officers from using excessive force on Eric Garner. His death was recorded, and the officers were indicted. There are many cases where officers are accused of excessive force such as PEOPLE vs ATKINSON. In cases such as this, there are officers stating force was necessary and defendants saying that unnecessary force had been used. The use of cameras helps to determine without prejudice and protect all

The body camera has become a popular choice amongst police departments worldwide. The situation of the scenario, and if the officer or suspect acted in the right can be determined from past footage. The cause of the body camera has been the allegations against officers for how they acted in certain situations, as well as for how the suspect acted during the callout. The effect has been officers being terminated due to lack of integrity or situational awareness, as well as officer safety. Suspects have also been convicted of false accusations against a police officer, as well as crimes presented in court, from fights, to officer involved shootings. The body worn camera has benefited both police officers and the general public.

Body Cameras in Modern Society Body cameras are a serious debate in modern society. They provide insight to a crime scene, and without them police brutality is common. Police body cameras are very important to provide a just jury system, and justice for those who have lost loved ones especially. Body cameras, in certain cases for the jury, could have been the difference between winning or losing the court case. Consider yourself as a family victim of assault, in a fictional scenario, the court would likely not be able to make a good judgement as to who is responsible for what, there was a police on the scene.

Body cameras can lastly, justify lethal force made by police. A man got his job saved after shooting a man and having a body camera filming, but first his bulletproof vest had to save him, this man would have lost his job if he did not have a body camera to justify the use of his gun. If someone tries to lethally harm you, you should have the right to retaliate against them, without losing your job. A cop got to keep his job after shooting a black teen as the teen tried to reach for the cops gun. All in all body cameras should be used to keep police safe and be able to keep their jobs.

Often throughout society police abuse their use of force. Police wearing body cameras were found to have had an seventy-five percent decrease in incidents of use of force. Body cameras are defined as “Tiny cameras that can be worn on the chest, shoulder or head” (Kon). Moreover, body cameras can increase “accountability on part of the police” (Kon). Body cameras help increase trust in police.

Body cameras in policing are still new, but more and more agencies are beginning to implement this technology into their line of work. At first police officers were very hesitant to wear these body cameras because they were afraid they would infringe themselves and give away their own privacy. Later, as body cameras were beginning to see more use in the work place, officers began to realize that these very own body cameras that they once thought would only cause themselves harm would actual prove to be useful in a variety of situations. Some of these situations can be citizen complaints, to even backing up an officers use of force. Body cameras can be the one sole thing that can give

Over the years there have been a large number of police brutality incidences reported in the United States. Unfortunately, there have been a large number of cases where the law enforcement officers have been at fault, but in turn, there have also been cases where the law enforcement officers have been falsely accused. In order to increase the public’s faith and trust in law enforcement, footage needs to be made available to, not only the press, but also the public eye with body cameras. Not only will these body cameras help prevent violence, but it will also show positive footage of good working law enforcement officers, and also hold law enforcement officers liable for their unjustified actions by being recorded.

It is alarming that 61% of officers say they do not report serious abuse that has been directly observed by fellow officers (“42 Shocking Police Brutality Statistics,” 2017). 84% of police officers have stated that they have directly witnessed a fellow officer using more force than what was necessary (“42 Shocking Police Brutality Statistics,” 2017). It is important to lower the amount of deaths caused by those who swear to serve and protect. Police body cameras will improve officer behavior by ensuring each and every officer is

Thesis statement: Though some might argue that the wearing of body cameras violate privacy, in fact the use of the cameras will minimize violence, show accountability, and a human side of policing.

However, there are other sets of rules that are passed down from many years of religions context to help us enter the Kingdom of God someday. Including the Ten Commandments, which are the most well known by far. These were given to us by God, but received physically through Moses on Mount Sinai on stone tablets, according to The Bible. Since that moment if Christian history, there was then a God given guide to our actions and their proceeding effects that would impact our transition into the afterlife.

Next, other studies were conducted on farmers since they are most exposed to the pesticides. One study was conducted in eastern Nebraska, and the study determined the risk of glioma, a brain tumor, associated with farming and the use of agricultural pesticide (Lee et al). The study included random selections from the eastern Nebraska area, and study was completed by telephone communications of men and women in the Nebraska area who were diagnosed with gliomas (Lee et al). The participants were asked what type of pesticides they used on their

The contemporary world prides itself on being more technologically advanced than any other recorded society in the history of humankind. One of the most prominent channels that technology has been able to assert its influence is in the digitization of every perspective of human life. Most of the human activities have adopted a technology; a move normally referred to as digitizing, in their operation. Education has not been left behind. There has been an incorporation of the digital process of learning at all levels of education. The process has a very large influence on the field of education today.