Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America Impact On Organizational Changes Essay

Every group, team, or organization has a leader. That leader has to have certain qualities to be well respected and followed by his or her following. Not only does the leader have qualities and responsibilities to maintain but also the group’s members. Both the leader and individuals in the group must have respect, fear, and honesty among each other to be a productive group.

Leadership is the elaboration of group inspiration. One person entrusted as leader can implore the aid, and support of supporters in the accomplishment of a common mission. According to Gurdjian, Halbeisen, and Lane “Becoming a more effective leader often requires changing behavior. But although most companies recognize that this also means adjusting underlying mind-sets, too often these organizations are reluctant to address the root causes of why leaders act the way they do” (Gurdjian, Halbeisen, and Lane, 2014) However, today abundant businesses engross importance on the improvement of leaders. Some of the ultimate leaders were formerly followers, such as in instructive businesses. One aspect as leaders many have to contemplate in striving

The Reciprocal Approach to leadership can be described as a relational, shared process with an emphasis on follower participation in the leadership. (Komives,

Leaders foster collaboration and build trust by empowering others to take initiative and responsibility (Kouzes & Posner, 2012). Within this practice, leaders focus on building a bond with their constituents, sharing information, and enabling their team to make independent decisions to meet goals. The primary goal of this practice is building trust with constituents. In addition, communicating interdependence and fostering collaboration are critical to this practice. The role of an exemplary leader is to create a connected environment where people feel supported, competent and

According to the leader-member exchange theory the relationship between leader and the member develops over a period of time.

To become a great influencer, a leader understands they must already have a relationship in place prior to a situation where influence is necessary. This can be referred to as “laying the groundwork”. Leaders should be setting themselves up for success every day by forming trusting relationships with colleagues, building credibility within and out of the organization, and by developing and nurturing their network. Great influential leaders do not wait until need something to begin connecting with others. In an informal survey taken by BlessingWhite, “three quarters of respondents said that they’d be more likely to do something for someone else if he/she had done something for them in the past.” (High, 2012). While it is important that the requests do not come across as tit-for-tat, making requests thoughtfully and selflessly is a great lesson for young leaders while growing in their understating of influential leadership.

The role of a leader is to set vision and direction for an organization, and transformational leader “is often depicted as having charisma, or personal magnetism” (Golensky, 2011, p. 73). The most important attributes of this type of leader are self-confidence, determination, vision, and motivation which inspire followers to embrace the proposed change. In addition to having a moral purpose and a compelling vision for the future, transformational leader also “sets a personal example for followers to emulate and demonstrates confidence in the proposed new direction through frequent communications and interactions with other group members” (Golensky, 2011, p. 73).

The Jake’s Pet Land case study is an example of leadership and follower situations, highlighting the key points of each role within an organization. This case is a study on how the leader-member exchange (LMX) impacts the outcomes of workplaces. According to Daft, LMX is individualized leader model that explores how the relationship between leader and follower develops over time and how the quality of the exchange relationship affects outcomes (Daft, 2015, p. 54). The LMX in many cases is the foundation an organization is built upon, because of this comes a great understanding between management and subordinates. There is a massive difference between being a manager and an effective leader, and throughout Jake’s Pet Land case study this notion is very evident.

This week we have been really discussing some interesting topics on the birth of leadership, also the core skills along with the mandatory skills that compliment excellent leadership. From the reading, the four equally important part’s that displays excellent leadership consists of: Firstly, Building Relationships. I can agree, “Relationships should be the primary focus of any leadership position. When people become the key to the organization, decision-making is shared, vision is collaborative; the team that is correctly aligned becomes “ fiercely competitive and an ultimate high-performance entity”(Guttman, 2009). In my opinion, this is so true about the importance of building good positive working relationships. Building relationships is all about perception and attitude. If you are the new teacher or administrator on the job, obviously no one knows who you are and because people do not know who you are, those people may or may not be reluctant to change or to buy-in to your vision. If you exploit your expectations, your vision and involve them in the process, then your colleagues will trust

The modern leadership theories (hereafter, theories) recognise the importance of followers in the leadership process. These theories view leadership as an interaction between leaders and follower. They focus on the relationship between a leader and follower and view this relationship as the core to the success of any organisation. Kirsty’s leadership may be seen as reflective of all the path-goal theory, leader-member exchange theory (hereafter, LMX theory) and the transformational leadership theory (hereafter, TLT). In this report a discussion will be provided of the ways in which Kirsty’s leadership may be seen as reflective of all these theories and approaches to leadership. A critical analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of Kirsty’s leadership for the Sandwich Company’s (hereafter, company) will also be provided to highlight how these factors could interplay in the company’s continued success. The success of the company illustrates that Kirsty effectively uses the guidance provided by each theory to inform her leadership practice. However, the company’s internal and external environment is starting to change. Therefore, the potential weakness inherent in the theories associated with her leadership style could come to surface which may delimit the company’s continued success.

According to Uhl-Bein,Schermerhorn, & Osbourn (2014) describes two terms in the leadership process, leader member exchange and the social exchange. The leader member exchange term is a study of the bond between a person in a in a group such as a manager and between his teammates. This bond is important to study because it can determine if the group can be successful. For example, if the manager and his team have a great relationship, they would display trust, and develop a respect among each other creating an enriched relationship. An enriched relationship will result in better performance and commitment would be higher. A lack of bond in a relationship involves lack of respect and would lead to negative job attitudes. This will create a negative

Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory explains the two-fold connection and the communication between a leader and subordinate. In comparison to the other leadership theories, the LMX theory is different because it focuses on the distinct relationships between the leader and each follower and the dual alliance that they share.It determines the extent to which leaders and followers have common respect for each other’s skills, personally feel a greater sense of compatible trust, and have a good sense of responsibility to each other. My questionnaire scores were in the high range for completing the questions both as a leader and a follower. My scores regarding my relationship with myleader were very high, a 35. In describing my relationship with followers, my score was in the high range, a 29. Reflecting about my scores, I wasn’t surprised about the results. I feel that in the role of leadership, I would work tirelessly to provide a positive work environment as well as positive relationships with my followers.But, there remains an area where I could improve in communicating better with followers. Being an all-inclusive leader would ensure that no followers would feel isolated. This includes to always provide a level playing field and to establish an environment where followers are not observing but instead participating. This would lead to an equitable atmosphere and would improve the major points of the leader-member theory: respect, relationships, and work ethic.

In developing my leadership skills, I used my past experiences with the many leaders I’ve had and decided that I did not want to become that type of manager, or I wanted to adapt their leadership style as my own. The one lesson I’ve learned throughout my years of employment is that leaders bring their own biases into an organization. The Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) clearly identified the relationship

Although Leader-member exchange (LMX) has its limitations, when applied to the role of the Student Centre Manager it is extremely useful. LMX is a relationship based theory of leadership based on the interactions between a supervisor and an employee. It recognizes the ability of high quality relationships to create job satisfaction, commitment and innovation. In the case of the Student Centre Manager, the role requires that staff are

Organizational transformation is inevitable with today’s job market. As a leader in an evolving business structure, leadership plays a significant role in business operations. A symbiotic relationship between management and subordinates exist within most organizational structures. Examining the connection must first establish a clear meaning of the term. Pringle and Starr (2006) proclaim that “management is the process of planning, organizing, influencing, and controlling to accomplish organizational goals through the coordinated use of human and material resources” (p. 3). An effective leader must have the ability to develop strategies for improving a business. Typically, one set goals and works toward successfully meeting those expectations. Furthermore, establishing a structure, which accommodates the body of the organization and consumers, is a beneficial approach toward an operative establishment. Also, persuasion is a unique method, which is valuable if appropriately used. Encouraging an individual to change their way of thinking is an easy task if the motive has a positive outcome. For example, promoting teamwork over an individualistic concept by placing emphasis on favorable results can inspire individuals to work collaboratively to meet a mutual objective. Lastly, regulation of a business setting is essential to eliminate pandemonium. Monitoring behaviors