preview

Bicameral Legislature Dbq Essay

Decent Essays

The US should stick with a bicameral legislature as opposed to moving to a unicameral legislature. The advantages of a bicameral legislature surpasses those of a unicameral legislature. A bicameral legislature allows for one chamber to be closer to its constituents. In addition, a bicameral legislature allows house and senate members to have distinct jobs which distributes the workload instead of putting it all in the hands of a single chamber. It also makes it so that it is less likely for a flawed bill to be passed. For those reasons, the US should keep a bicameral legislature.
A benefit of a bicameral legislature is that constituents get better representation through the House of Representatives. According to Document B, the House of Representatives is meant to be closer to its constituents while the Senate focuses on being the more deliberate chamber. Basically, House members specialists while Senators are …show more content…

According to Document E, “…there is no sense or reason in having the same thing done twice, especially if it is to be done by two bodies of men elected in the same way and having the same jurisdiction.” This means that the two chambers are the same thing. Senators and House members may be elected the same why, however, they do not share the same responsibilities as said in Document E. This is important because the document is inferring that having one chamber is the same thing as having two but it isn’t because each chamber has its own duties. They both play a role in passing legislation however, they do have some distinct jobs. For example, the Senate has the power to approve treaties. Meanwhile, the House has the power to initiate spending bills, and impeach officials. They also have different committees to handle different tasks. Saying that the two chambers have the same power isn’t completely correct. This is why a unicameral legislation wouldn’t work well with the

Get Access