preview

Behind The Beautiful Forevers Analysis

Good Essays

Morality is like ice, and corruption turns that ice into muddy water. One of the greatest juxtapositions in the novel by Katherine Boo, Behind The Beautiful Forevers is between the characters of Abdul and Asha. Abdul struggles to remain morally unshakable like ice, questioning if people can stay good when surrounded by corruption. Asha, on the other hand, scams her neighbors and sleeps with authority figures for power- muddy decisions at best. Asha even goes so far as to cover her responsibility by asking, “how is it my wrong if the big people say it is right?" The answer to these questions lies in both the novel and in science. First, it is important to define what corruption is. The term, “corruption” covers a broad range of human actions, …show more content…

In the case of Asha, being exposed to corruption only resulted in corruption, yet is it possible that even a group far worse than the Indian government, the Nazis, were simply “doing their duty”? At Yale, psychologist Stanley Milgram showed in an experiment that “ordinary” men would inflict severe pain on others simply because they were asked to do so by an authority figure. When an actor failed to perform a set task, the director told a test subject to deliver increasingly harmful electric shocks to the actor. Many subjects went all the way to the maximum amount of volts simply because they were commanded to. In another study, the Stanford Prison Experiment, psychologist Philip Zimbardo randomly assigned students to play the roles of prisoners and prison guards, until Cruelty ensued. The guards forced the prisoners to sleep on concrete, took away their clothes, and abused them. “In only a few days, our guards became sadistic,” Zimbardo claimed. These are two powerful demonstrations in social science, but unfortunately, they appear to be misleading. Although many people do underestimate the power of situations in driving behavior, individual differences matter far more. In the prison demonstration, Zimbardo claimed that ordinary people underwent a transformation, yet the students who participated in the experiment were recruited for “a psychological study of prison life” and it takes a certain …show more content…

Abdul was raised by his parents to keep his head down and work hard so that he might escape poverty. He is merely a workhorse and “wasn't even sure that he had any moral judgements”. Despite these factors, Abdul does a mostly good job of remaining moral, besides trading with thieves, because he knows that a run-in with the law could spell disaster for his family. It is not until he meets The Master in the detention center that Abdul changes his motivation. The Master confronts the boys about their future and the horrors that await them if they do not conform their lives to society's image of goodness. Abdul hears, “Offer up your flesh, agree to be eaten by the eagles of the world, and justice will come to you in time”. This message is appealing to Abdul because of the happy ending the story promises. Since he has been raised to have a positive work ethic, he does not see any shortcuts because only hard work will carry him to success. He resolves to turn his life around and become one of the few boys who learns the lesson because he wants to and not just because he has to. On the other hand, Asha comes from a village so destitute that the slum is a more pleasant place to be. Asha has developed a very survival-focused view on life which unfortunately translates into her belief that “the ends justify the means”. This commonplace expression is exactly how corruption begins

Get Access