Behavioural Observation Data

Analyses shows that personality changes throughout life as different personality traits are used and forgotten. The results are generalized and don’t always apply to people but typically the results are correct.

Personality and how we behave have been of much interest to psychologists for a long time now and because of this there have been many theories and theorists that have been developed. Personality is defined as consistent behavior patterns and intrapersonal processes originating within and individual (Fritzley, 2012, p. 10). There are six main approaches to personality psychology they include: biological approach, humanistic approach, behaviorist approach, trait approach, psychoanalytic approach and cognitive approach. Each approach shines a little light onto why we behave the way we do and how our personalities are formed, the approaches contain many different theories from

Personality is defined as the unique way in which each individual thinks, acts, and feels throughout life (Ciccarelli, 2014). Numerous individuals are curious in regards to their actions and how their mind works, thus leading companies to create personality tests, in order to provide individuals with some perspective on their personality. While individuals can take personality tests for leisure, personality tests are often utilized in situations such as job interviews, diagnosing mental disorders, and educational purposes. Two popular personality tests are the Keirsey Temperament Sorter and the Big Five Personality test. After taking both tests, I analyzed them using my knowledge of general psychology and of my own actions. I found the

The study of personality traits is beneficial in identifying the many variables that exist from human to human; the combinations of these variables provide us with a true level of individuality and uniqueness. In the field of psychology, trait theory is considered to be a key approach to the study of human personality (Crowne, 2007; Burton, Westen & Kowalski, 2009). This paper aims to identify a number of significant contributors who have played crucial roles in both the development and application of trait theory. This paper then moves focus to these theorists, outlining their theory and analysing both the strengths and weaknesses of those theories. An illustration of the methods used in trait measurement is given and includes the

In this analysis gaining background information within taking the NEO-PI-R along with comparing and relating results to self-analysis and room with a cue personality project a fuller more encompassing dispositional signature is revealed, requireing all methods in testing personality traits. First, we examine the experience of taking the NEO-PI-R and the accuracy of the results. Second, a comparison between self-analysis and NEO-PI-R result specifically in correlations between methods in openness to experience and extraversion. Examining average levels of personality traits of conscientiousness and agreeableness and contradicting results in the NEO-PI-R method for neuroticism begins framing a personality profile for Linsay Sullivan. Finally by reviewing previous method, Room with a Cue, offers environmental cues validating results of the NEO-PI-R method combining similarities and building differences. Resulting in the two methods developing a well-rounded dispositional signature. Concluding the best method for understanding personality traits is a combination of all three: self-analysis, environmental cues, and NEO-PI-R, as well as, what we learn from each method.

Personality assessments can serve as valuable tools to determine personality types, and subsequently allow us to understand certain behavior patterns. My own personality assessment revealed that I have an ENFJ personality type; I am an extrovert; have a preference of intuition over sensing; have a preference of feeling versus thinking; and have a preference of judging over perceiving (Jung, n.d.). The results of my assessment were quite revealing, mostly accurate, with room for interpretation. Real-time circumstances and the environment have a direct impact on my behavior. According to Revelle and Condon (2015) “People differ from themselves on a moment to moment basis in that they do not think, feel or act the same all the time. They change in their feelings, in their thoughts, in their desires and in their actions.”

I used the behavioral activation form to track daily activities and myself for several days. My daily behavior included going to class, eating, playing games on my phone, checking Facebook, sleeping, going to the library, studying and hanging out with friends. Some negative behaviors that were low on importance and enjoyment included eating junk food, buying fast foods, and playing games on my phone. Some positive behaviors included hanging out with family and friends. The life area I selected was mind, body, & spirituality, which is physical, emotional, or spiritual health. The value I selected was healthy and fit, which is very important to me. One positive activity that adheres to the chosen value and is relevant to the chosen life area

A person’s personality says much about who he or she is. People define personality in different ways. Researcher after researcher has tried to come up with the best definition for what personality truly means. Case studies, correlational studies, and experimental designs are some of the most commonly used methods of research. These methods help better define personality. The advantages and disadvantages of each method differ and can be helpful or hurtful to the research of an individual’s personality.

Method Participants & procedure Participants for samples 1 and 2 were recruited from an introduction to personality course given across multiple semesters. In sample 1, participants consented for their data to be used for research purposes and completed other measures beyond the scope of this article in exchange for $5 compensation (participants could opt out of their data being used for research purposes and still earn full compensation). In sample 2, participants consented for their data to be used for research purposes in exchange for extra credit (alternative extra credit assignment provided) but did not have the additional project or financial compensation. In both samples, the instructor of the course was blind to who participated in the study until after the semester ended. All data collection was subject to review and approval by an Institutional Review Board.

People come in all shapes and sizes, and, certainly, every person is unique. However, you’ll probably agree that some people are much more alike than others. Moreover, behavior that may seem random is, in fact, quite understandable and often even predictable, once you understand that person’s inborn, natural personality, or genetic blueprint . . . Which describes basic psychological characteristics. Moreover, one’s personality is by far the best and most reliable predictor of behavior. (9)

Traits are mostly stable over time, fluctuate with individuals, and they impact behavior. In some theories and systems, traits are something a person either has or does not have, but in many other traits are dimensions such as extraversion vs. introversion, with each person rating somewhere along this spectrum. The trait theory approach to personality is different than other personality theory’s because it is fixated on the differences between individuals. The mixture and collaboration of numerous traits form a personality that is exclusive to each person. Trait theory is absorbed with recognizing and computing these individual personality features. Since the inception of the psychology of personality, psychologists have been trying to account for regularities in behavior such as famous trait theorist Gordon Allport. (Piekkola, 2011)

Almost everyday we describe and assess the personalities of the people around us. Whether we realize it or not, these daily musings on how and why people behave as they do are similar to what personality psychologists do.

The purpose of the application paper is to define five concepts in our own words from each unit and apply them to the personality we originally described in the initial paper providing examples. The five concepts I will define are the following; biological approach, psychoanalytic approach, S Data, I data, and objective test. The first concept I will present is the biological approach. The biological approach considers an individual’s genetics to create a reason on why that individual may act a certain way.

The study can merely be called systematic and scientific when it concerned unbiased observations that are quantified so that systematic analyses can be performed (Allen, 1990). Dworkin and Kihlstrom (1978) underlined that the prediction of behavior will be improved by the use of personality tests. In line with this, many personality inventories with certain extent of reliability and validity have been developed to aid in the study of personality.

The following will reflect this researchers understanding and reflection on personality, how it defines one, what it means, and if one’s personality changes to fit certain situations. At the end this researcher may have a better insight into herself as well as the personalities of others. This insight can help her in her future endeavors.