This ratio is the product of a research that was published on the journal “American Psychologist” by Barbara Fredrickson and Marcial Losada. The articles name being “Positive Affect and the Complex Dynamics of Human Flourishing” which was cited more than 350 times in other academic journals. Fredrickson is a distinguished psychologist, a professor at the University of North Carolina, a winner of several notable psychology awards and bestselling author of several psychology books. She is the object of widespread admiration in the field of psychology, Martin Seligman, a former president of the American Psychological Association and a bestselling author in his own right, went so far as to call her “the genius of the positive psychology movement”. …show more content…
He works in statistical mechanics and combinatorics. To the public he is best known for his criticism of postmodernism, resulting in the Sokal affair in 1996. They both critique the mathematics that was in all the research, “The Lorenz equation Losada used was fluid dynamics,” says Sokal “In 10 seconds I could see it was total bullshit”. ("The New Review: PSYCHOLOGY: The 'Magic Ratio', According to some Psychologists, is a Mathematical Way of Predicting Human …show more content…
Larsen and Prizmic argued that the balance of positive and negative affect (the Losada ratio) is a key factor in subjective well-being and in defining whether a person flourishes. Larsen and Prizmic discussed work by several authors (e.g. Fredrickson and Losada, 2005; Gottman, 1994) which suggested that to maintain an optimal level of emotional well-being and positive health, individuals need to experience approximately three times more positive than negative affect. Given thus background the conducted a study to address three questions: First, is there evidence that a specific positivity ratio distinguishes individuals with different mental health status and especially flourishing from non-flourishing individuals? Second, are there are differences in the positivity ratio when daily affect data are used? Third, does the proposed critical positivity ratio of 2.9 discriminate individuals with different mental health status equally well across the adult lifespan? (“The Ratio between Positive and Negative Affect and Flourishing Mental Health across
Margaret Floy Washburn was born on July 25, 1871 in New York City to parents Reverend Francis and Elizabeth Floy Washburn. She was born in a time when women were not allowed to display any type of power, higher reasoning, or desire for higher education. At the age of seven, she began her educational journey in the home of a retired Presbyterian minister who lived next door to her family. In 1886, she graduated from high school at the young age of 15 years old. Upon completion of high school, she attended Vassar College where she studied Chemistry and French. However, by the time she had graduated her educational interests had changed to philosophy and science, which
From the perspective of positive psychology, there is a well-being formula invested by Martin Seligman to achieve a higher well-being. Martin Seligman (2010) defined as happiness: H (to maintain the length of happiness) = S (happy range breadth) + V (you can control the factors) + C (your living environment). Happy length: the distinction between "temporary" happy and "persistent" happy. Temporary happiness can be achieved by food, comedy, bunch of flowers. While the persistence of happiness is mainly affected by genetic, and this genetic trait can be changed. The breadth of happiness: psychologists think that we are born with a happy constant point, like a thermometer. If there is a happier thing, even if we are upset, it will be dedicated
Stephanie Fryberg’s research interests focus on how social representation of race, culture and social class influence psychological well-being, and educational attainment. Fryberg is currently an associate professor in American Indian Studies and Psychology. She previously worked as an associate professor of psychology and affiliate faculty member in American Indian Studies at the University of Arizona. Rebecca Covarrubias earned a Bachelor of Science and a Master's and Ph.D. in Social Psychology from The University of Arizona. Dr. Covarrubias is currently a lab director and assistant professor at for the Department of Psychology at the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC).
person both in her own time and in psychology’s history” (Goodman, 1980, pg. 5, para.
Virginie Silla’s movie Lucy is what would call absurd, so only a few people actually take the time to watch it. Lucy, a twenty four year old female who is over-seas studying in Taipei, Taiwan. It is surely a different way of thinking, because it expands your mind more than imaginable. The movie shows us what it would be like to be able to expand our minds to a hundred percent and all the “superpowers” we would have. The drug that is portrayed in the movie is what makes Lucy such an amazing human.
During these chapters nine generations of Shem’s descendants, the Semites pass through. In the beginning of these chapters God calls on Abram, who is living with his father Terah and his wife Sarai on Haran. God makes a covenant with Abram, promising to make Abrams’s descendants into a great nation. Abram agrees to leave is home and move southwest to Canaan with his wife and his nephew, Lot, to a land that God has promised to give to Abram’s descendants. Abram takes up residence there and erects a number of altars throughout the land as symbols of his devotion to God.
Brenda Pulido is a freshman student at California State University, Stanislaus and is currently majoring in psychology. Pulido received her High School diploma from Livingston High, in Livingston,Califormia. Pulido chose to go to CSU Stanislaus to stay close by to her family, while in the meantime have her own individual space. Pulido dreams of owning her own office as a psychologist. Pulido is very fascinated by the study of the mind, she would like to further understand the functions and behavior of the human mind. Even though she thinks she is the least creative person you'll ever meet, she wants to inspire those around her, as she states “I want to be remembered as a very helpful person that contributed to society.” Pulido is known to be smart, shy, and very dedicated to her academics.
In this video, Achor (2011)discusses how instead of simply trying to help or cure individuals with some problem in their life, positive psychology tries to take average people and find ways to reach their full potential. Many people believe that if they change the circumstances in their environment, they can generate greater amounts of happiness and well-being in their lives. Achor (2011) maintains that only about ten percent of long term happiness can be predicted by the external world, a whopping ninety percent is dependent upon what happens within our minds; and by changing the way people process the world around them, it can ultimately change how they perceive reality. Approximately twenty-five percent of job success can be predicted by
Lyubomirsky defines happiness as the “experience of joy, contentment, or positive well-being, combined with a sense that one’s life is good, meaningful, and worthwhile” (184). She challenges the myths that people can find happiness by changing their circumstances and that people either are “born happy or unhappy” (186). Happiness is not something that can be found or something that not everyone can have. People make their own happiness, despite the difficulties they may face. Happiness comes by “choosing to change and manage your state of mind” (185). Lyubomirsky gives cases of people who are happy even though they suffer from losses and setbacks. These are the people whose circumstances should make them unhappy, but their intentional actions bring them joy. She also gives cases of people who have not suffered any major losses but are still unhappy because they may see events negatively and feel helpless before them. Lyubomirsky asserts that “changes in our circumstances, no matter how positive and stunning, actually have little bearing on our well-being” (186). Even though a person’s circumstances may be positive, those circumstances do not make them happy. Lyubomirsky uses a Subjective Happiness Scale to measure happiness, which takes the average of numerical answers to four questions. She argues that in order to become happier, “you need to determine your present personal happiness level, which will provide your first estimate of your happiness
Happiness is one of the most significant dimensions of human experience. Many people can argue that happiness is a meaningful and desirable entity. Studies indicate that everyone pursues happiness in various aspects of their life. Our four fathers saw happiness as a need, so they made the pursuit of happiness as one of the three unalienable rights branded in the Declaration of Independence. There is a sense of complexity behind the meaning of happiness; its definition is not definite. Think of happiness as a rope; there are many thin fiber strands bonded together to become the strength of the rope. Like the analogy of the rope, there are numerous factors that can contribute to an individual’s overall happiness in life. This study is going to
Achor utilizes a meta-analysis, or the combination of different findings, of over 200 scientific studies to prove his overall theory that happiness leads to success in almost every aspect of life from family to friends to careers and businesses. He does not rely solely on the data or information from a few relevant case studies, but instead relies upon experimental research to support his claim. He utilizes his findings to create “The Seven Principles”, which are “patterns that predict success and achievement” (Achor, 17), which is headed by “The Happiness Advantage.” He utilizes the concept of positive psychology and neurological activity to showcase the point that we can “retrain our brains to
People can train their brain to scan for the positive and become experts at capitalizing on Happiness Advantage (Achor 91)
Positive psychology, which has emerged recently, is the scientific study of human thriving. Psychology traditionally focuses on dysfunction—on people with mental illness or other psychological problems and how to treat them. Positive psychology, by contrast, is a relatively new field that examines how ordinary people can become happier and more fulfilled. In his 1998 APA presidential address, Seligman, the founder of positive psychology, argued that psychology had become too focused on curing mental illness according to a disease model, and that, for all intents and purposes, it had become a “victimology” (Seligman, 1998). What was needed, he averred, was a new “science of human strengths,” a positive psychology (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000).
It is apparent that children are taking in music from numerous sources in their everyday lives. The psychology of an adolescence gives a unique look on how certain stimuli, such as music, can affect the way they think, and more importantly, act. The first place to look would be the brain, looking into what makes up these processes. The teenage brain is an ever-changing organ, that it constantly molding to stimuli that affect it on a daily basis. This stimulus includes music, which has similar effects, as would food, drugs, and sex (Kassem, 2014). In the vast majority of individuals, listening and even participating in music can affect both behavior and emotions.
The Second World War lasted from 1939 to 1945, which involved most of the world 's nations, organized into two opposing military alliances: The Allies and the Axis. It is considered the most extensive war, with more than 100 million armed forces assembled. The Allied forces placed their entire economic, industrial, and scientific capabilities at the service of the war effort, destroying the difference between civilian and military resources. It was the deadliest conflict in human history (Reference), which resulted in over 70 million fatalities caused by military action against civilians, the Holocaust and the use of nuclear weapons in warfare. This essay concerns itself with why and how the allies won the Second World War. Joachim von