preview

Bad Habits, By Ann M. Graybiel And Kyle S. Smith

Good Essays

The article “Good Habits, Bad Habits”, written by Ann M. Graybiel and Kyle S. Smith, indulges in the idea that in every task we preform, our mind use one of two ways. The first way is the mindless way. This approach is where we do tasks without thinking. We use this technique almost everyday. For example, when a person takes the same route to his or her job everyday, they are using this process of thinking. The second technique is considered the “deliberation circuit” by Graybiel and Smith. This procedure is the opposite of the first. It involves some sort of decision making to take place, before an action can carried out.
The mindless technique is how habits are formed. To coherently understand this, we must first take an in depth look at …show more content…

When partaking in something that is habitual, the brain monitors the actions that take place. In that situation the brain works like a monitor. It merely observes what is taking place.
Every action has a reaction; these reactions fuel the actions that will be done in he future. Let’s look back on our smoker. If he was experiencing nausea and vomiting after every cigarette he smoked, then he would be prone to quit smoking. We see that the reason he would be prone to quit smoking is because of a negative reaction to smoking. This is an example of action reaction.
Ivan Pavlov was one of the brightest of his time. His vast experiments with dogs, helped us better understand the process of the mind (Blumenfeld 33). One of his greatest accomplishments is when he determined that once a habit is formed it is never forgot, even if the habit is broken. The habit is simply censored for the moment. He found this true in dogs and it was eventually proven to be true in rats. This idea is highly important; it is why relapses of addictions are triggered. When a habit is overcame, it is merely hidden. There may or may not be a time where it is uncovered, but it will always be in the …show more content…

In an experiment conducted by Wolfram Schultz and Ranulfo Romo, rats were given a two choices, and each choice was triggered by an instructional tone. In the initial tests, the rats would be taught where to go after each tone; consequently, they would be rewarded if they went to the right area after the corresponding tone went off. Eventually, the rats began to develop a habit of going to the area that the tone signaled, and receiving their reward (Graybiel & Smith 41). A habit was created because of the treat they were given; this is an example of positive reinforcement. In this case food was used as a positive reinforcement; however, there are a variety of options that can be considered a positive reinforcement. There are certain guidelines these reinforcements must abide to, such as they must be something that is pleasurable rather than a basic necessity. If I was going to use food, then it would have to be something like cookies, chips, or anything else appealing (Kazdin 159). In my case, positive reinforcements would be put in action when I go beyond the three-hour limit when studying my notes. Negative reinforcement would be applied when I do less than the required three hours, or I took less than five

Get Access