In the video, researchers that conducted the study were people from the public health service. Also I would also go as far as saying the US government along the lines of guilty by association. This documentary stated many times the underlying motivation of this study and very clearly showed racism as the gas pedal. African Americans were the target participants in this study, they were discriminated against and said to have “bad blood”. A women who helped in these studies and spoke in the video stated that “the bad blood these people were interested in was syphilitic blood but in general in that day and age bad blood could have meant a number of different things.” Bad blood could have meant anything from anemia to fatigue.
Q2)
In actuality there was only one stated purpose for this study and that was to study “the effects of untreated syphilis in African Americans.” Although the stated purpose the nearly 600 participants heard was that this study was a cure for “bad blood.” Not only were participants in this study African American but they were also mostly poor, illiterate farmers in Alabama. The ideal test group for researchers that didn’t want/need many questions arising.
Q3)
…show more content…
They were thought to have been getting rounds of penicillin, the most effective form of treatment at the time. What they were actually receiving was a lot of times aspirin or other forms of pointless medication. Even though this study was not showing promising results the benefits were too good in the eyes of these men to pass up. Participants were promised not only free treatment but also insurance that their burial would be paid for and their families would not have to pay. Survivors insurance they called
There is speculation that minorities, particularly Blacks, are discouraged from research, because of the dishonesty in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. In this study, medical treatment was withheld from African-American men, who were infected with syphilis.
In 1932 the federal government commenced a medical study called The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Blacks with Syphilis in Macon County, Alabama. Four hundred and twelve men infected with the disease were selected for the study that faked long term treatment while really only giving placebos and liniments. The goal of this study was to determine if blacks reacted similar to the whites to the effects of the syphilis disease. After forty years it was discontinued and the Senate initiated an investigation of the study. At the time of the investigation, only one hundred and twenty-seven of the study’s original participants were still alive and had not died from the disease (Morehan, 2007). In the film, the story is told from the view point of
Tuskegee Syphilis Study was originally a program to help improve the health of poor African Americans in the south, but later on, in the program, a dark turn was taken, and it ended up harming African Americans instead of helping. Starting in the 1900s syphilis was a widely spread sexually transmitted disease. In 1905 Fritz Schaudinn and Erich Hoffman discovered the bacteria that causes syphilis and then a year later August Wassermann introduced the first diagnostic blood test to identify syphilis (page 747). Then, in 1911 Paul Ehrlich created salvarsan, and although it could not treat syphilis it could halt the disease and prevent it from being infectious (page 747). Unfortunately, these events lead to the U.S. Public Health Service and Julius Rosenwald Fund creating a program to diagnose and treat syphilis in African Americans down in Mason County, Alabama (page 747).
The doctors and the nurse were more interested in gathering scientific data than showing concern for these African men’s human rights. There was no concern for the ethical issues involving these victims. The syphilis scientific study was written about in medical journals for many years but community outrage did not happen until a reporter exposed the study to the general public. The scientific syphilis study ended after it was exposed to the public.
The experiment first began in 1932, in a small county within the Macon County of Alabama area. In this are rate of syphilis was up by 35%. Interestingly, the setting of the study was conducted at the Tuskegee Institute, which we know now to be Tuskegee University. The study conducted of 399 men, 201 out of the 399 were used as the control group. The control group contained of those who actually didn’t have the diseases. The study also targeted those who were poor and illiterate. A lot of those patients had the slightest clue to which they were being tested for, only being told they had “bad blood”. The doctors participating in the study thought it would be vital; to not inform
In the documentary, George Strait tells us the truth behind the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male. The study was carried out in Macon County, Alabama between 1932 and 1972 on a large group of black men. About four hundred men were infected with syphilis, a disease sometimes called “bad blood”, while the other two hundred served as the control group. It aimed to discover whether blacks would react to syphilis the same way as whites, and to decide how long a person could live with the disease without treatment. The men that were used in the research were left untreated with syphilis for forty years and suffered hugely at the hands of government doctors.
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study was an experiment on African American males and the effects of untreated syphilis. When the study began in 1932, the men were not fully aware of what the doctors were “treating” them with. They were wrongly informed that they were receiving treatments for “bad blood”. In reality, about 600 Alabama participants were infected with syphilis. Unfortunately, as these men were not aware of the virus they carried, they infected their loved ones as well. The men in this study were drawn in by the promise of medical benefits and more. As the study continued on, penicillin was found to be a cure for syphilis in 1947. However, it was withheld from these men and they continued to suffer unnecessarily. Finally, in 1972 the truth
The book BAD BLOOD: THE TUSKEGEE SYPHILIS EXPERIMENT by James H. Jones was a very powerful compilation of years of astounding research, numerous interviews, and some very interesting positions on the ethical and moral issues associated with the study of human beings under the Public Health Service (PHS). "The Tuskegee study had nothing to do with treatment it was a nontherapeutic experiment, aimed at compiling data on the effects of the spontaneous evolution of syphilis in black males" (Jones pg. 2). Jones is very opinionated throughout the book; however, he carefully documents the foundation of those opinions with quotes from letters and medical journals.
To deny that race played a role in the Tuskegee study is naive. All 600 subjects (399 experimantals and 201 controls) were Black. The officials in charge of the study failed to obtain informed consent from the subjects in a study of a disease
According the to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment was conducted in 1932 by the Public Health, which included 600 black men as their test subjects. Of the 600 men, 399 had syphilis and 201 didn’t (CDC). The men were told that they were being treated for “Bad Blood” and didn’t have any knowledge of being included in a study (CDC). In exchange for their services, researchers offered the men free medical exams, burial insurance, and free meals (CDC). The study was called “ The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male” (CDC).
In 1932, Macon county Alabama, the United States Public Health system along side of the Tuskegee Institute and finances from the Rosenwald fund created an epidemiologic study in which they would study the effects of syphilis in the African American male. This infamous study became known country and worldwide when the truth about the study was revealed proving the men in this study had been deceived into believing why the study was truly taking place and what this meant for many of the men and the families involved. After this study it was clear that there was a severe amount of racial discrimination among the medical field in the area, which would then lead to the distrust of African Americans and their physicians.
This study brought up a lot of unethical controversy because the researchers knowingly didn’t treat these patients, even after an effective cure of penicillin was discovered. Not only did the researchers not treat these patients that they had promised to treat, they also never told them what their actual disease was. They also never informed these subjects that their disease was spreadable, therefore infecting and affecting more people than the just the people who agreed to this treatment. The whole study was based on a lie from the beginning and it was also at a time of the depression, leading these people to be at last resort and a lack of money. At the time, there was a lot of racism and these African Americans believe that they were being useful and wanted to help as much as they could, according to the lecture. These African Americans were uneducated and may not have had a clear understanding of what was going on or what they were reading and
Thus firstly, past medical treatments provided and studies for syphilis were largely influenced by social darwinism ideology, common usage of African Americans as test subjects, and present knowledge about syphilis at the time, contributed to this study experiment being performed.
Tuskegee’s study of untreated syphilis is a notorious clinical study that was initiated in 1932 and ended in 1972. This study was initiated by the US Public Health Department and performed by the government physicians. The main purpose of this study was to assess the natural progression of the untreated syphilis. They included 399 men who had syphilis and 201 men who hadn’t have syphilis. Initially the study started to treat the syphilis, but even after there was no enough budget, they didn’t stop the study. The physicians had promised that the study participants were given free treatment of the syphilis but the fact was that the physicians and “US Public Health Department” were assessing the progression of the syphilis and not giving the treatment to the participants. Participants were unaware about this clinical research. In addition to this, participants were told about insurance, but they hadn’t been provided insurance.
By the doctor’s negligence to get informed consent and bribing the participants with incentives, it is pretty apparent that they were conducting an unethical experiment on black men. They claimed that informed consent was not required because the men simply could not have comprehended the details of the study. The officials, instead of giving the men all the necessary information on the study, bribed the men with incentives to participate. These incentives included free physical examinations, free rides from Nurse Rivers, good meals, and $50 dollars towards their burial insurance. The researchers were not required to explain the study details so therefore did not inform participants of what they were enduring.