I chose to look at the above scenario using the Autonomy ethical principle. Autonomy principle says, “you should have the ability to act independently and make decisions for yourself” (Warnock, 2017). Using this approach If a patient has an advanced directive you would follow it because it is the patient’s chose written down in advanced. However, using this principle may violate some social laws or morals. Because, brain dead is the same thing as being dead, the person should be removed from life support (Baillie, McGeehan, Garrett, & Garrett. 2012, p. 260). The conflict arises when the patient’s advanced directive or family insist on continuing life support, despite the patient’s brain dead status. At which point you must consider if it is right provide a dead body with limited resources a living person could have used. I chose this theory because it seems the best policy in most situations. However, in the real world I would use a combination of the principles so I can look at the situations from all points of view. Life is not cut and dry and nether is every situation or circumstance. Which of the five principles is the most widely used and accepted in the …show more content…
5-6). This is because “American culture itself, see attacks on freedom of choice and freedom from unnecessary restrictions as attacks on human dignity and so as prima facie, or presumptively, evil. That is, such attacks are seen intuitively to be wrong, unless the opposite can be clearly established” (Baillie, et al, 2012, p.11). Basically, the US putts such significances on the individual and their inherent rights that our declaration of independence is based on it. Our society is designed to ensure everyone is afforded their rights. Autonomy falls in line with the overall beliefs of the American
There are some ethical dilemmas evident in this scenario, starting with an End of life dilemma, refusal of care and informed consent.“End of
For quite sometime in American history it has been a reoccurring pattern to have restriction placed on the freedoms to live, love and pursue happiness for those who did not fit the cookie cutter model of an average American.
The ethical principles for nurses to practice with beneficence and no maleficence. This legal battle between Terri Schiavo’s husband and her family was an ethical debate between continuing artificial life or remove her feeding tube by the request of her husband. Using the theories of utilitarianism and deontology can be applied or considered in making the most ethically correct resolution. The cases are very complex and raise many moral and ethical issues. The cases have brought awareness to society of “the importance of discussing end-of-life issues with family members and underscores how an advance directive, a living will and/or durable power of attorney for health care, are a healthcare proxy clarifies and provides evidence of the wishes of an individual regarding end-of-life decisions. Terri Schiavo should impress upon laypersons and professionals alike the uncertainty of the context in which issues of continuation and termination are argued ethically. Nobody knows what Mrs. Schiavo would have wanted. She left no advance directive and in its absence her husband says one thing and her parents
In our culture, respect for individual autonomy is valued to the highest degree. We want to do what we want to do, what we think will give us fulfillment and meaning in life. In other words, we value our liberty and the last thing we want is somebody or some circumstance infringing on it.
Being independent is also an important factor to being an American. Jerald M Jellison and John H Harvey’s “WHAT IS Freedom?” gives the reader a look positive and negative aspects to having the
When a patient is unable to make decisions for himself or herself, their caregivers and those who know them are appointed to make the decisions based on what the patient would have wanted. This is called surrogate decision making. According to the article Terri Schiavo and End-of-Life Decisions “when surrogate decision makers and caregivers cannot agree upon what that choice would have been, they may turn to the courts to determine either what the now-incapacitated patient would have chosen or who is best suited to choose as the patient would have” (Mathes, 2005)
Why is self determination one of the most important American Ideals? The basis of this proposition relies on equal application of basic human rights. It is often taken for granted that certain rights such as freedom, equality and education are necessary for the American Dream to function. Optimistically, these are constant for all citizens. Thus the self determined choices made within this system are the keys to success within America.
Sometimes what the patient desires is not always communicated verbally, but it’s often written down in advanced. An advance directive is a living will, which the patient wrote and agreed to while they were in a competent state of mind. Now when the patient is Incompetent and is unconscious, obviously they cannot decide for themselves, as a nurse your job is to learn or know that that patient has in their advance directive. For example a DNR Form (Do not Resuscitate) is a type of an advance directive, if the patient has a heart attack and the heart monitor is displaying a flat line , which indicates no heat beat . As much as you would want to attempt to bring that patient back to life, you cannot, because that patient signed the DNR form, this would be violating the patient’s right.
Some people may think that personal independence is good. A value of independence would be that people can go wherever they choose to without someone telling them where to go. Another one would be that anyone in America has the right to say whatever is on their mind without getting in trouble by the government. If some people choose to go out on a Friday night and party with a bunch of their friends, then they can. Although,
In end-of-life scenarios, where the patient may not be able to communicate their wishes, decisions must be made either by the healthcare professional(s) or family member(s). However, who gets to decide or where the line should be drawn are not always clear. Consequently, not all decisions may be ethically permissible. To illustrate, I will discuss a scenario in which physicians and family are not in agreement. Upon proving a brief summary and explaining the ethical dilemma, I will provide moral reasons for two ethically permissible choices from which, by referencing the principle of autonomy and Utilitarianism, will determine which course of action ought to be carried out.
Nurses are constantly challenged by changes which occur in their practice environment and are under the influence of internal or external factors. Due to the increased complexity of the health system, nowadays nurses are faced with ethical and legal decisions and often come across dilemmas regarding patient care. From this perspective a good question to be raised would be whether or not nurses have the necessary background, knowledge and skills to make appropriate legal and ethical decisions. Even though most nursing programs cover the ethical and moral issues in health care, it is questionable if new nurses have the depth of knowledge and understanding of these issues and apply them in their practice
The current health situation should be explained in a non-technical way so the patient (if possible) family, and or valid surrogate can understand every aspect. The physician should also help them understand when there is no hope for recovery. Most often the organs are no longer functioning, or there is little to no brain activity; at this point suffering potentially outweighs the probability of recovery. Medical teams most often realize that the focus should be on comfort, rather than extending a dying life. This decision comes with a great deal of uncertainty, and will always be hard, no matter what age of the patient, or the circumstances. Kathryn Kosh, MD explains that, “Ready access to advanced modern technology has changed death from an event to a process… Defying death requires payment [in the form of] pain and discomfort or in an unacceptable decline in the quality of life.” Often times physicians will not prescribe treatment in the first place knowing that this option will not benefit the patient, prolong suffering; and will likely end in termination anyway. Therefore, allowing the nature of the illness or injury to take its own course of action. Another point of interest regarding this topic is that medical teams realize in most cases, that providing an ethical and dignified death can be just as rewarding as administering aggressive measures to save a
Nursing is an all encompassing profession in which practitioners are not only proficient in technical medical functionality, they also have the obligation to remain compassionate and respectful of patients and as such are expected to adhere to pre established codes of ethics. Of these ethics, autonomy is of extreme importance as it offers patients a sense of personal authority during a time where they may feel as if their lives, or at the very least their health, is no longer under their control. Autonomy in the context of nursing allocates the patient and often their family with the final word on the course of treatment. The concept of patient autonomy is a highly variable subject in all fields of health care. It is a universal concept that varies widely in its meaning and interpretation. Autonomy in its simplest form can be defined as a state of independence or self governing (Atkins, 2006). Patient autonomy can also be defined as the ability to make once own decisions, based on one’s sound judgment. It is defined by the American Nurses Association (ANA, 2011) as the "agreement to respect another 's right to self determine a course of action; support of independent decision making." This seemingly straight forward ethical concept is rife with difficulties when one considers potential disagreements that may arise even when informed consent is provided, particularly among children or vulnerable people. Relevant research and
Everyday, healthcare professionals are faced with ethical dilemmas in their workplace. These ethical dilemmas need to be addressed in order to provide the best care for the patient. Healthcare professionals have to weigh their own personal beliefs, professional beliefs, ethical understandings, and several other factors to decide what the best care for their patient might be. This is illustrated in Mrs. Smith’s case. Mrs. Smith is an 85 year old who has suffered from a large stroke that extends to both of her brains hemispheres which has left her unconscious. She only has some brain stem reflexes and requires a ventilator for support. She is unable to communicate how she wishes to proceed with her healthcare. Mrs. Smith’s children, Sara and Frank have different views regarding their mother’s plan of care. The decision that needs to be made is whether to prolong Mrs. Smith’s life, as Sara would like to do, or stop all treatments and care, as Frank feels his mother would want. In the healthcare field, there are situations similar to this case that happen daily where moral and ethical judgment is necessary to guide the decision that would be best for the patient. The purpose of this paper is to explore and discuss, compare and contrast the personal and professional values, ethical principles, and legal issues regarding Mrs. Smith’s quality of life and further plan of care.
There are four commonly accepted principles of bioethics. The first is the principle of respect for autonomy. Respect for autonomy is a respect for the client to make informed and intentional decisions, provided that the client is judged to be capable of doing so. This principle is the base for the practice of informed consent as well as the right to accept or refuse treatment. The client is to be able to make a rational, informed decision, without any external factors influencing any decisions. This principle may cause what the health care professional perceives to be harm, but to the client, like a muslim client refusing to have a xenotransplantation from a pig, accepting the treatment would cause him to suffer