preview

Authority In Shakespeare's King Lear

Decent Essays

King Lear In Shakespeare’s “King Lear,” the characters that are in an authoritative role display a disregard for the world around them, revealed only when their positions of power are taken away from them, which affirms the author’s theme that supremacy prevails over a chaotic society. Throughout the tragedy, there is a constant battle between the individual in charge, which is King Lear, and the individuals whom the power is being given to, which are his daughters. The abuse of power reveals a sense of betrayal, and ultimately affects the whole country being ruled under the King. King Lear is initially presented as the utmost hierarchical figure, making it clear that everyone respects his opinion. During this time period, kings were seen …show more content…

King Lear’s internal battle of giving away authority turns into a problem for his kingdom, as Steven Sohmer, of “Early Modern Literary Studies,” writes, “The redemptive elucidation of this text could depict the struggle between chaos and order as being relative to the demise of the kingdom due to Lear’s lapse…the concept of celestial versus terrestrial could be expressed…” (Sohmer). Lear’s frustration with his children is affecting him, especially seen when nature seems to be going against him as well. As the enraged king reflects on the demolition of his proposed arrangement, a livid storm occurs, representing the true severity of how upset he feels with how everything has turned out. In addition, Lear is faced to deal with the repercussions of his childrens’ wrongdoings when the news is delivered that, “There is division, although as yet the face of it be cover'd with mutual cunning, 'twixt Albany and Cornwall; who have--as who have not, that their great stars throned and set high? But, true it is, from France there comes a power into this scatter'd kingdom; who already, wise in our negligence, have secret feet in some of our best ports, and are at point to show their open banner…” (Shakespeare 27). Although the fault of Britain turning to turmoil is not entirely the king’s, he still feels responsible that his own children are power-hungry. Part of Lear’s internal …show more content…

“The world has been emptied of all vitality, that of the soul’s spontaneous rebellion against the ego, as well as that of bastardy and excess…”(Oates). Towards the end of the tragedy, the false innocence of the children and the true guilt of the king can be seen. Initially, Lear was wrongly portrayed as selfish, but it is made clear that it was the wrongdoings of his offspring that reflected poorly on his decision to betray God’s law. Another form of betrayal is seen in Lear’s daughters as Shakespeare writes, “If it be you that stir these daughters’ hearts against their father, fool me not so much to bear it tamely; touch me with noble anger, and let not women’s weapons, water-drops, stain my man’s cheeks! No, you unnatural hags…” (Shakespeare). In the family aspect, betrayal is seen in the form of two power-hungry daughters that go against their father right after pledging their love to him. Finally, betrayal allows the reader to truly realize that those with good intentions are forgiven, but those with tyranny in mind do not get to lead a happy life. The ultimate point Shakespeare is trying to make is that disrupting what is normal may occur in slight forms or extreme forms, but either way, chaos will succeed. This final conclusion about King Lear when Capet states, ”His fate is to learn that there is, there must be, since the hardness of

Get Access