Attention Whole Food Shoppers Rhetorical Analysis

I saw a comercial for Toys R Us on one of the TV's they had ,in the electronics department, and it said that they were hiring people to work at one of thier locations. They used bright colors to attract peoples attention and also a professional spokesperson to read thier message for them. It stated that working there would provide money above minimum wage and would provide good benefits. I think they said that to get peoples attention. It definitely caught my attention because at the time I was looking for a job. The audience was anyone who heard it and needed a job. It was made to inform and persuade people to work there instead of other places.

‘Food Inc’, is an informative, albeit slightly biased, documentary that attempts to expose the commercialisation and monopolisation of the greater food industry. The film attempts to show the unintended consequences resulting from this, and for the most part this technique is very effective; however there is an overreliance on pathos in lieu of facts and statistics at times.

It also states that a second Green Revolution can end hunger forever because the first Green Revolution missed marginal land and that if a second Green Revolution occurs it would

Paarlberg begins by addressing the problems surrounding the slow, organic agricultural system that many people favor as a solution for the issue of world hunger. It has become a popular trend among the upper-middle class to favor shopping and supporting organic agriculture and produce, hence why Paarlberg intentionally addressed “Whole Foods Shoppers”. Paarlberg, states that society needs to “de-romanticize our view of pre-industrial food and farming”(143). First, he tackles the “myths” about the Green Revolution. A technique Paarlberg uses throughout his article, is

Another discussion post with one-sided sources. At least the prompt addresses the issue having to feed a growing population. Green Revolution farming practices such as irrigation allow us to produce more food with less land. Having to convert natural areas to farmland has its own issues affecting wildlife and biodiversity, and Green Revolution farming protects more natural areas while providing needed sustenance to people. We shouldn’t be vilifying farmers without looking at all the facts.

There were many major issues around the world that brought around the start of the Green Revolution. One major cause was the inadequate amount of food in relation to the population. In Doc. 1, a graph is provided that compares the wheat yielded in Mexico and India from 1950-2010. From 1950-1970, the graph shows that Mexico’s crops yielded low amounts of wheat. For India, the graph shows that the crops yielded low amounts of wheat from 1965-1985 which was after the Green Revolution began. The purpose of this graph was to provide the statistics on wheat yielded and how it changed over the decades. The intended audience of this graph was the scientists who wanted to see the progression before and after the revolution. This graph is significant to the topic because it shows that the low amount of wheat yielded

Introduction: The Green Revolution was a research and development initiative aimed to increase the number of crop yields from the years between 1930-1960 and the subsequent years following them which resulted in the adaptation of various technologies leading to the invention of high-yielding varieties of seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and new irrigation methods. It has facilitated socio-economic changes which have helped in preventing natural calamities due to the ever-increasing world population and has provided people with an option of self-sustaining and reduced poverty. The Green Revolution was a joint venture between the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation while Dr. Norman Borlaug, the father of the Green Revolution has been

“We cannot doubt that at this moment, many people in the famine-stricken homes of Europe and Asia are dying of hunger”. The quote by Harry Truman was one of the many problems that the world was in a famine. Many countries, like Mexico and India, were in a famine. This caused millions of deaths due to the lack of food being grown. The Green Revolution, which could be credited to Norman Borlaug, was a movement that improved the living conditions in many areas (Mexico as an example). The Green Revolution led to an increased amount of grains, new technology, and

The Green Revolution was a development and research project that improved technology in agriculture starting from the 1940’s. This had the largest impact on the food production in developing countries. The improvement increased yield in crops. In turn, this would have also increased farming income. It also implemented two to three different crop patterns and the use of the scientific method in order to identify issues and create solutions. It also created an increase in jobs. The revolution helped developing nations, like India, to keep up with the food needs of a growing, impoverished population. Negative consequences are the long-term effects of only using two to three crops depleted the land and eventually lowered yield. The heavy use of fertilizer has lowered the carbon content of soil and biodiversity. Also, the heavy production of crops does not allow for the land to rest, which increases weeds and impacts soil quality.

Education is a very powerful weapon, one that isn’t available to many however if it were, we could solve many issues within the world. The biggest and most fundamental problem which can be seen globally is, world hunger.The sad reality is that this is an issue and one that not many are talking about. In his article Frederic Seebohm proclaims that the world bank estimates “that there are now one billion absolute poor in the world” (Seebohm 5). He continues to define “absolute poor” as “those whose condition of life is so degraded by disease, illiteracy, malnutrition and squalor as to deny its victims basic human necessities” (4). The fact that there are so many hungry people in the world today is mind-boggling when you think about it. We are well into the 21st century. We now have the ability to communicate instantaneously with people all over the world. The collected knowledge of humanity, is literally at our fingertips via smartphones in our hands. Now some may assume that world hunger is still a grave issue simply because there is not enough food to feed everyone. However recently scientists who have studied world hunger, have found that the world produces more than enough food to feed everyone on the planet.The main cause of worldwide hunger is poverty. As R. C. Pickett mentions the “ the world has at present 1.5 billion hectares of arable land that remains uncultivated”(31). The problem isn’t that there isn’t enough land, the issue remains with the coordination of food production. Millions of people around the world are simply too poor to buy food. They also lack the monetary resources to grow their own food, such as the means to harvest, process, and store food.The interaction of domestic animals within the cropping systems needs to be intensively revaluated. A solution that Pickett suggests includes “governments and businesses interacting to provide a favorable price and availability structure of the necessary inputs for adequate production, and to supply needed economical processing, storage, transport, and utilization systems” (32). His solution is to aim more government intervention as he believes that much more food could be produced at least in certain areas but is not, simply because there is no

He provides many logical analysis of the given cases to establish his credibility. Pathos is not as evident in his article; he refrains from it to build a sound argument. The author uses many numerical statistics to back up his claims. However, these certain evidences have not been cited by an authority which lead us to question his validity. He manages to provide several examples to support an idea he is developing. Hardin refers to the “Food for peace program” as an example to appeal to the case of the “World Food Bank”. The discussion of both the potential negative and positive sides of the “Food for peace program” is what build the author’s credibility. His opinions do not seem to be biased as he merely analyzes the situation off of statistical numbers and past experiences. Hardin includes certain terms that may be unheard of by certain readers, such as “tragedy of the commons” and the “green revolution”, but he does provide a clear definition for these terms in his article. The author uses a heavy choice of words and has a serious tone, which is mainly to highlight the importance of the subject being

The Green Revolution was created by Norman Borlaug who was a scientist that specialized in agriculture. The Green Revolution began when Borlaug found a way to make a wheat plant resident to diseases which allowed the wheat plant to grow bigger and better in the 1940's. Which was amazing, however the Green Revolution has its downfalls. A positive of The Green Revolution is the increase in crop production. The increase in crop production causes a decrease in the amount of world hunger. World hunger is an issue because we are unable to feed our growing population. So if we stop the Green Revolution we would have an increase in world hunger. There would be children that would grow up not knowing where there next meal was or where their next meal

The green revolution was caused, for the most part, by the lack of a substantial food supply for the world population. As Dr. Norman Borlaug said, there were billions of people in the world who were constantly plagued with hunger. They did not have the proper conditions or nutrient rich soil that are necessary for growing enough crops to sustain themselves. Dr. Borlaug was involved in the research for the Green Revolution, he predicted that unless the methods of the Green Revolution were “fully implemented”, then the results would not suffice, and the starving population would remain hungry. (Doc 2). President Truman expressed similar sentiments about the world

In the article “The World Food Crisis: What is Behind it and What can we do”, Holt-Gimenez argues that the world food crisis has a significant impact on people all over the world, hindering opportunities for people to purchase food. In addition, Holt-Gimenez provides the roots and solutions for the crisis. Some of the causes for this crisis that he lists include an “increase in grocery bill, and the growing crisis locally”(Holt-Gimenez,2008). A few solutions “include worldwide assistance on manufacturing foods” and “giving fair prices to workers, farmers, and consumers” (Holt-Gimenez, 2008). This article provides readers with insight on a variety of reasons for the origins, and solutions for this disaster. The critical reflection will deliver a summary and an analysis for the pros and cons of the arguments that Holt-Gimminez made.

In the twentieth century improvements in crop yield and quality were achieved through the breeding of plants which produced modern and efficient agriculture strategies. Yields have increased throughout the last century and continues to increase each and every year. The Green Revolution sounds like a great idea because it can solve world food problems. Wheat has been the main crop behind the Green Revolution. Crops are threatened by thousands of diseases that make global food supply vulnerable. Some of which are infectious and non-infectious and caused by factors like mineral deficiency or pollutants. Another problem to come with the Green Revolution is that growing plants is not necessarily “green”. They require a lot of energy to make the product which causes environmental damage. When you increase food supply in growing nations it can lead to human overpopulation. When this occurs more people get hungry and when there is not enough food supply people can starve.