Atomic Bomb DBQ

Though other parts of the world thought that the atomic bomb was overkill, like literally overKILL, the U.S thought that it was a neccesity to win the war. In the first piece of evidence, the table provides the estimated number of casualties through invading Japan. It shows that in total, there would be an esimated 1,200,000 deaths on the allies side. William Shockley predicted a huge amount of deaths ranging from 1,700,000 to 4,000,000 deaths while invading japan. Using this bomb helped lessen that death rate for the side of the allies.

It was immoral for the United States to drop a bomb when there was opportunities to defeat the Japanese in various ways. The United States could stage a demonstration of the nuclear weapons they could possibly use or even use less violent weapons like smaller bombs. Similarly, another argument was that the atomic bombs saved American lives. “That was the attitude of the United States in those years… I have been convinced that we saved more lives than we took.” (Doc 3) Colonel Tibbets recollected his experiences when dropping the bomb and seemed to be persuaded that dropping an atomic bomb would only have positive effects.

The use of the atomic bomb the U.S used against Japan was Unjustified. The U.S had several other alternatives to solve the conflict between the two countries. Furthermore, the bomb was strongly racially motivated and had many inhumane side-effects to the dangerous explosion when the blast had hit Japan. Before resorting to using the bomb the U.S should have considered the many options they had at hand.

The United States did not want to drop the atomic bombs unless they were provided no other choice. Reviews of the records reveal a tale of Japanese military refusing to acknowledge the full impact of the bomb. They threatened to continue fighting despite their civilians wanting peace (Pincus 2). The hardheadedness of the Japanese infuriated some. “Japanese must surrender or face the rain of ruin from the air, the like of which has never been seen on this earth” (Pincus 2).

On August 9th, 1945, a B-29 American bomber dropped the world’s first atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. In a flash, 90% of the city’s population, about 80,000 people, were wiped from existence. In the following years many more Japanese people would die from the radioactive fallout from the bomb. Three days later, another bomb of the same type was dropped on another Japanese city of Nagasaki. The devastation of these two extremely powerful weapons seemed almost impossible. Still, I think it was justified because it actually saved lives. The estimated death toll of American soldiers, Japanese soldiers, and Japanese civilians if we were to invade Japan to finish the war was much greater than the toll the atomic bomb took. When they fought, the

Although there was no compromise, the ongoing war in the Pacific against Japan was ended. The nuclear bomb was devastating and killed thousands of people in the explosion. Although, according to some of President Truman's advisers, this was less than the amount of people that would have died if the war had kept going at the rate it currently The atom bomb brought a tragic end to the war between the U.S and Japan. Although, some people think it actually saved lives. What if there was no atom bomb?

I do not think it was necessary for the US to strike Japan with a nuclear bomb. As we learned from the lecture, Japan had been bombarded continuously with non-atomic bombs. We had destroyed Tokyo and killed thousands of Japanese civilians. In addition to that, we learned that Japan had made an offer to surrender with the condition of keeping their emperor, which we denied. This fact contradicts the argument that the Japanese were unwilling to surrender.

World War II started on September 3, 1939. Germany decided that they were going to invaded Poland. The United States did not get invaded until December 7, 1941 when Japan bomb Pearl Harbor near Honolulu, Hawaii were attacked by the imperial Japanese Navy. The attack on Pearl Harbor was surprise, United States should not drop the bomb because, I would want to save Americans lives, but they really didn’t care about our lives so why should we care about their lives ? My reasons are, they wasn’t surrendering, possibility of losing the war, could kill more people.

1) There are many opinions for the reasons the atomic bomb should have been used in the destruction of Japan. The bombing of Pearl Harbor in December of 1941 certainly helped make the decision to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The bombing of Pearl Harbor destroyed the U.S.S. Arizona and killed over 2000 Americans. As quoted by President Harry S Truman,” The atom bomb was no “great decision”.

n mid-July, President Harry S Truman was notified of the successful test of the atomic bomb, what he called “the most terrible bomb in the history of the world.”   Thousands of hours of research and development as well as billions of dollars had contributed to its production.   This was no theoretical research project.   It was created to destroy and kill on a massive scale.   As president, it was Harry Truman’s decision if the weapon would be used.

When the United States dropped the first atomic bomb over Hiroshima Japan many people doubted and resented that decision. It is understandable why they feel that way but they may not beware of the what would’ve happened if the United States hadn’t. America made the right decision by dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan because it brought an end to the war and it prevented thousands of deaths and injuries that would have happened if they didn’t drop the bomb and instead invaded Japan. The United States government made the right choice by dropping the atomic bomb because it brought an end the World War Two.

In WW2 two bombs were dropped on japan. In August 1945 president truman decided two drop two atomic bombs on Japan.i think it was a good idea because in the end it resulted in less deaths and because we were not going to mess with them until they bombed pearl harbor. The lesser of 2 evils, also the amount of deaths were lower than they would have been, and we stopped they war by doing this. Gorge from history extra.com says “ It was certainly a reasonable view for the USA to take, since they had suffered the loss of more than 418,000 lives, both military and civilian. To the top rank of the US military the 135,000 death toll was worth it to prevent the “many thousands of American troops [that] would be killed in invading Japan” – a view attributed to the president himself.”

(Doc C). Next, Winston Churchill’s recollection of the Potsdam Conference also emphasized the need to end the war before Soviet intervention. It seemed to be a mutual agreement between the U.S. and Britain that the two powers should not need the Red Army to end the war with Japan (Doc E). Finally, nuclear physicist Leo Szilard’s recollection of a 1945 meeting between James Byrnes and a group of concerned atomic scientists supports the idea that America dropped the atomic bomb to intimidate the U.S.S.R. The scientists were very concerned about the rapid spreading of Russian influence in Europe, which probably contributed to the U.S. policy of containment. Due to this fear, James Byrnes and the atomic scientists believed that demonstrating the bomb would make the Soviet Union more manageable in Europe. One can also argue that this approach can be related the John Foster Dulles theory of massive retaliation, which is the belief that the threat of “massive of retaliation” with nuclear weapons would stop Soviet aggression. Therefore, one can argue that the dropping of the atomic bomb was a diplomatic measure calculated to intimidate the Soviet Union and one can argue that this idea was backed by the theories of containment and massive retaliation.

The use of the atomic bomb against Japan was completely justified in both cause and impact. An intense weapon was necessary to force a quick Japanese surrender. The bomb saved thousands upon thousands of American and Japanese lives that would have been lost if the war continued or an invasion occurred. The bomb was the only way to end the suffering of the millions who were being held captive by the Japanese oppressor. The weapon of mass destruction also sent a powerful message to the shaky Soviet allies. The choice to use the atomic bomb was justified because it compelled a Japanese surrender, saved countless lives, served as retribution for the sufferings of many people, and

On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped the first atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. This was an extremely controversial military strategy in the United States. Was the United States justified in the dropping of the atomic bomb? The U.S. feared the rise of communism and gave aid to any country against it. The U.S. also fought countries threatening the spread communism. One of these countries was Japan. We began a harsh and brutal war against Japan and against communism. This war was killing many soldiers and Japan was not backing down. President Truman decided to use the atomic bomb when things were getting worse. The decision to use the atomic bomb was a difficult one and many people wonder if it was the right