Asylum Seekers Persuasive Essay

The detention of asylum seekers on offshore islands has becomes central to Australia’s border security program (Dickson, 2015). The offshore detention, processing and resettlement regime branded the ‘Pacific Solution’ was terminated in 2008; it was reconfigured and resurrected in 2013 (Larkin, 2017). Manus Island and Nauru were closed in 2008 by the Australian Labour government, bringing an end to the ‘Pacific Solution,’ the centres were once again used in 2012 to house asylum seekers by the same government that ended the practice years before (Dickson, 2015). The next year, in 2013, the Australian Coalition government made Australia’s asylum policy even sterner, with ‘Operation Sovereign Borders’, which placed all the control of asylum operations in the hands

Ask yourself this, if we were on a plane and it broke down with everyone being stuck on an island. Would the government not try to find us? To save our lives and bring us back to a better place where there is food, shelter and an overall better living environment. Then why not look for asylums seekers out there? An asylum's seekers life here in Australia is another life saved from war, conflict and other disasters. Asylum seekers should be able to come into Australia through boat and by any means necessary as something that is an act of humanity and not an act of the law, rules and regulations. Because they don’t have time to wait around and be saved by someone. We do not get to decide whether or not their life can be here but we do get a say about it! So let's all make a difference. The main reasons for me bearing this opinion is one of three. For one, Asylum seekers should be able to enter Australia on a boat because they are trying to get away from war and conflict,

Did you know that the Australian Government has been relocating almost 50% of asylum seekers who have asked for our assistance to other nations, such as Thailand? Not only is this racist, it is downright inhumane to treat people as though they are objects simply because they come from underdeveloped countries. What have these people done to deserve this fate? The answer is nothing. I simply do not believe that turning these people away from our country is the right thing to do; they are innocent people who were in an unfortunate situation and do not deserve to be penalised for what they could not

Today 60 million refugees, and asylum seekers are internally displaced . This is almost double what it was 10 years ago. Mega conflicts in Syria and Iraq have displaced millions of people. These are conflicts that are pushing refugees and migrants into flight. The world is in the midst of an unprecedented humanitarian crisis. Yet Australia’s approach in recent years has been to punish people seeking asylum, while increasing the numbers of refugees it resettles. This contrasting approach threatens the long and proud history Australia has of successful integration of refugee communities. This report reflects what we have heard from refugees and people seeking asylum, and the people supporting them. We thank all of the people who contributed to this report. The past two years have been a dramatic and traumatic period for refugees, both at home and abroad. More people are seeking safety – from persecution, conflict, violence and violations of human rights – than at any time since World War II. In the past two years, we have seen lifeless children washing up on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea. We have seen ordinary Europeans lining up to help refugees at train stations. We have seen Australians demanding successfully that their leaders let in an extra 12,000 people fleeing the crises in Syria and Iraq.

Political unrest and local war happens around the world all the time. Many people live in a dangerous situation and suffered from violence. Hence, large amount of asylum seeker undertakes a huge perilous, try to cross the ocean and arrive Australia. To deal with this issue, Australian government enacted mandatory detention policy and offshore processing policy, these policies become highly contentious in the community with many arguments and criticisms. This report will focus on the nature and purpose of these immigration policies and the impact towards the asylum seeker as well as the criticism form international. To propose some advice about how the future policies should be framed.

The focal issue of this argument is when an Asylum Seeker arrives in Australia without a visa, they are required to stay in detention well beyond the period of time it should take to gather basic information about an asylum claim, health identity or security issues. This can lead to an asylum seeker often being detained for months and sometimes for years. Under the Migration Act (Cth.) 1958 there is no time limit on this detention and only very limited review by the courts is available. The ‘United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty’, rule 11 (b) (UNHCR) considers ‘detention as; confinement within a narrowly bounded or restricted location, where freedom of movement is substantially curtailed, and where the only opportunity

Refugees come to Australia seeking asylum, seeking love. We are denying them and sending them offshore. Thats disgusting, it is basically like seeing someone have a gun to another persons head but not helping or stopping. If we are trying to improve our nations welcome for refugees why are we putting them down and not letting them into our

Visualise that you are in the shoes of one of the Asylum Seekers. They travelled by boat with their family to get to Australia to escape a threat to their lives; would you do the same thing? How would you feel if people from Australia did not let you in and turned their backs on you? You would feel horrible, realising that after travelling for weeks onto to realise that there was no point. This is what asylum seekers out there are feeling.

For many years refugees have been demonized by the country through the spread of fear and misconception. Furthermore, the disgusting treatment of refugees in the detention camps by the Australian Government has been roundly criticised by the international community.

The term ‘illegal immigrants’ is a term used by the media to manipulate public opinion and thereby attempt to change or shape government policy. Asylum seekers are not terrorists wishing to corrupt the Australian way of life, but simply victims of western imperial aggression seeking safety in Australian

International law under the 1951 Refugee Convention, permits the right to seek asylum and allocates a responsibility to provide protection for those who lie under the definition of refugee. Since then policies have been modified and used to suit the interests of the government. In particular, the Border Protection Legislation Amendment Act 1999. Authorised the removal of undocumented ships in Australian territory and proclaimed that anyone aboard the ship can be forcibly returned and denied application of asylum. Other legislation, such as the Migration Legislation Amendment Act 1999 makes it illegal for a person to carry people who are not citizens without valid documentation. These policies allow the government to portray itself as strong on border protection and terrorism. This plays well to its core constituencies but is rightly lambasted by human rights organisations and civil liberty groups. Refugees are undocumented people fleeing from their country of origin, so there isn’t a variety of travel options to escape to safety. The policy disclaiming that ‘everyone who lands by boat doesn’t get to stay’ is ignorant to the concept of why people are forced to leave. It’s not a choice to be removed from your country, it's a matter of survival and safety. The core principle of the Refugee convention is that people are not forced to return to a country where they face the threat of persecution or danger.

Those who flee economic conditions that threaten their lives must be treated differently than those who just choose to emigrate. Immigrants, asylum seekers, should be deliberate about contributing fully to their new society. First, they should use their gifts for career matches. Learn and obey all laws of the land. They should learn English and be eager to teach their native tongue to US residents if requested.

America’s refugee policy should be handled with an unprejudiced attitude, refugees are just doing what anyone else would do. Fleeing danger in search of advantageous living conditions is a basic human instinct.

Asylum seekers in Australia always been the focal point of negative political concern for a long time. To stop asylum seekers continue arriving in Australia by boat, Australia enforces the policy of obligatory detention of asylum seekers, unauthorised asylum seekers arriving by boat will be sent to Papua New Guinea camp where operated by the Australian government (‘Asylum seekers: Australia’s shame’ 2017). However, this policy was reported as disgraceful because of the deficient living condition, indefinite and arbitrary of detention and lack of health care (United Nations 2017). Cohen (2011 p. 242) stated that moral panic could be more likely to develop in anything associated with 'immigration, migrants, multicultural absorption, refugees, border controls and asylum seekers’. Is Australia's response to asylum seekers an example of moral panic? By analysing the five criteria from the moral panic theory by looking at the Australian public reaction to asylum seekers with references support, it could be found that the reaction to asylum seekers in Australia is an example of moral panic.

They wait in the detention centres for years in hopes that their applications for asylum be processed. Even if these asylum seekers are found to be refugees, they are not allowed to be settled in Australia. They may be settled in Nauru or Papua New Guinea. There is regular abuse in the centres and it’s not just towards adults. Despite poor conditions, the centres are far from cheap to run. Something need to change.