preview

Assess The Difference Between Voluntary And Involuntary Euthanasia

Decent Essays

“Euthanasia has been a profound ethical issue confronting doctors since the birth of western medicine, more than 2,000 years ago,” - Ezekiel Emanuel. This phenomenon, also referred to as mercy killing, is the act of intentionally and painlessly executing an individual with an incurable disease or in some cases an irreversible coma. The procedure has been used as long as 5th Century BC by Rome and Greece to end prolonged agony to the ill. It is most notably used in history by the Nazis in World War II. In modern times human Euthanasia is mostly frowned upon, but in pets is a common practice. Greek for “good-death,” this practice of killing ill patients comes in various forms. There are three classifications of Euthanasia: voluntary, nonvoluntary, …show more content…

This legal in some counties. On the other hand, when someone is incapable of granting permission, such as being unconscious or comatose, this is referred to as nonvoluntary. This form of Euthanasia is illegal in all countries. Contrary to popular believe, there is a significant difference between nonvoluntary and involuntary. When the patient is conscious, and are forced against their will is considered involuntary Euthanasia. It is illegal in all jurisdictions and is a crime. In addition, there are two methods of performing Euthanasia: passive and active. Passive is when a patient has life-saving treatments withheld and has “nature take its course.” Active is when direct procedures take place such as a lethal substance getting injected into a …show more content…

They believe this practice will actually end suffering to patients. If a person struggles with the pain of an incurable disease, the best option is to put an end to their extreme pain by killing them. The next argument is if the patients dies, then it would financially support the hospital they are in. The benefits are there would be more free space for future ill in need hospitalization, more money towards other funds instead of treatments that do not terminate diseases, and more equipment to be able to use because less people would live off machines. Proponents of Euthanasia also agree that voluntary Euthanasia must be legal everywhere because it should be the patient’s decision. If the patient does not have a say, they argue the patient’s freedom of choice has been

Get Access