Asia Dbq Essay

1. The Mongols really did reinvigorate cross-Eurasian trade. The Silk Road trading routes that had existed for about 1000 years by the time the Mongols made the scene had fallen into disuse, but the Mongols valued trade because they could tax it, and they did a great job of keeping their empire safe.

Between circa 1925 and circa 1950, the relations between the Chinese peasants and the Chinese Communist Party became out of hand due to the peasant rebellions/uprising groups present, the tension between Japan and the communist party, and most notable the mass reform during this time period.

The Mongols were nomadic pastoralists who originated in the Eurasian steppes but eventually conquered the largest contiguous empire in history. The first ruler Genghis Khan was able to unite the loosely-bound nomadic clans in 1206 AD and begin seizing land through ingenious military tactics such as base-10 warrior organization, trickery, and terror. Later, his grandson Kublai Khan continued conquering new land and adding it to their vast yet relatively decentralized government. Although there were a few positive effects of Mongol rule, they still had an overall negative impact on Eurasia because of the large quantities of deaths they caused and their weakening of Chinese power in their own government.

For article one my country, Italy voted for each motion to pass. For motion one, we voted to pass it as it was to give us, Italy our land we were promised from the Treaty of London. As for the other three motions, we voted to pass them as we made alliances with the other countries, excluding Germany to allow us to receive what we wanted from the Treaty of Versailles. We also voted to pass the other motions as they did not affect our country personally. For the votes, all for went in our direction as we voted yes to each motion, which all went through with a pass.

Throughout history, various peoples have been considered harsh, violent, and uncivilized. One empire well known for its either barbaric or kind nature, are the Mongols. Based on the documents, the attitudes of various people towards the Mongols in Eurasia from the 13th century to the 14th century were positive, neutral, and negative.

The British took over and surrounded over one quarter of the world’s population. India was one of those country that was taken over and it was considered the “Jewel in the Crown”. At first India and Britain were connected by the British East India Company for trading. Once India started getting weak and falling apart, Britain took advantage of this and took complete political, economic, and social control. Britain’s administration for India was useful, creating transportation all over the country, and sending Indians for better education.

Explanation: When you bring the shotgun to your shoulder, the stock should be brought to your cheek first and then back to your shoulder. A common error is lowering the head and cheek to the stock, instead of bringing the stock all the way up to the cheek. When done properly, with your head naturally erect, the gun butt always should come to the same spot on your shoulder.

About eight hundred years ago, during the thirteenth century a tribe from the grasslands of Asia conquered a great part of the world. The Mongols were illiterate and their history is complex to tell due to the lack of writing and their very complex language but it can be said that the Mongols were barbarians and brutal in the way that did what was necessary to conquer.

The United States certainly knew it was going to win the war against Japan by any means necessary. Many actions leading up to the conclusion of the war were brutal. I imagine that there might have been other ways to bring about Japan’s surrender without bombings that devastated Japanese civilians or continued military action resulting in exponential loss of American service men. Maybe I’m wishful. Is it possible that Japan related to American destruction of its country? Was it in words that Japan understood given its destruction of Asia? Perhaps, the only way to defeat Japan was to emulate some of its actions. I’m wondering how much of these policies were driven by American sentiments back home in the states. The propaganda machine most certainly instilled a level of disdain against the Japanese. This would be exemplified by the internment of Japanese

The Mongols, a small tribe 800 years ago expanded and conquered a lot of Asia, Eastern Europe and the Middle East. The Mongols are known for being ruthless warriors and having a negative reputation, being called “Barbarians”. They were in fact Barbaric, but how Barbaric were the Mongols really? The Mongols were extremely barbaric and were unmerciful. The Mongols caused so much destruction, caused many deaths and ruined people's lives, and not to mention how inhuman, savage and evil they were.

When it comes to the political and economic effects that China and India felt, their experiences were both similar. The wealth made from markets in India went to Britain and money made from selling opium to the Chinese also went to Britain. In regards to the war in China and India, both countries experienced a strong sense of nationalism after having to endure the exploitation and mistreatment of the British. Both countries also lost many of their battles. However they were fought over different reasons. The social effects the Indians and the Chinese felt were also different. Even though India experienced some negative effects, the British was able to modernize and improve many parts of India. On the other hand, China’s population was left in pieces after opium entered the country. Overall, China and India were similar economic and political wise, but the social effects differed greatly.

The geography of the region shaped the lives of the people in the Ancient World by allowing permanent settlements to flourish, by allowing technology to adapt, and by isolating them from other cultures. The geography of a civilization can range from mountains, deserts, oceans, and forests. This can allow for many advancements and setbacks.

The effects of the Cuban Revolution on women’s lives and gender relations in Cuba from 1959 to 1990 include that some say women have not reached equality yet with men, women gained more opportunities for themselves, economy and politics, and also how women still had responsibility for children and home, not men.

The ratification of the constitution was a process which was very controversial and tedious. The people chose sides because they were undereducated about the constitution and were easily influenced. The Federalists’ supported the ratification of the constitution because the Articles of Confederation was falling apart and was causing many domestic and foreign distresses.

that religion and politics have a long history in the Middle East does not mean that religion is always, or even most of the time, a crucial factor driving political conflicts. Most of the politics of the Middle East have been viewed by those inside and outside the region as driven by religious difference. From the Arab-Israeli conflict to the Iranian revolution to the emergence of