The army’s goals establish a clear sample of developing implementation strategies, and the importance of identifying the ERP infrastructure components. To emphasize, it is important to identify the risks and impacts of a vanilla or customized system implementation. For this reason, some of the key goals and key considerations in the Army for using an ERP system were to eliminate boundaries, synchronize transformation between the institutional and operational army and identify opportunities to maximize the army at the enterprise level.
First, the “Understanding ERP system life cycles from inception to operations and the effects on today’s organizations is fundamental to fulfilling the long-term investment in an ERP system”. (Motiwalla, 2011, p. 154). With this in mind, some of key goals in the army using an ERP system are the changes planned for optimization, integration and standardization of the processes within the organization. Therefore, it includes the fast changing operational environment, remove boundaries between One Army and One Enterprise, synchronize transformation between institutional and operational Army, optimize the army at the enterprise level, transform the army, affect combat operations by anticipating change and providing decisive and
…show more content…
The change management lead is responsible for developing strategies and detailed work plans, monitoring progress, and resolving change management issues.” (Motiwalla, 2011, p. 125). For this reason, the change management process incorporated into the implementation used by the army was blueprinting, “refers to all the activities, which are necessary for the reproduction and description of the customer's business operations in an ERP System.” (TechRepublic, 2009). In addition, the Army analyzed customization of the software instead of changing business
The future direction of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) is being increasing defined by the needs of business units and divisions, less by the hierarchical requirements of IT departments. This transition is occurring with increasing speed and velocity, shifting the balance of political power in organizations to the line-of-business users, away from IT, while also drastically changing the architecture and platforms of ERP systems (Markus, Petrie, Axline, 2000). The intent of this essay is to define how ERP will develop over the next five years, also defining what ERP's development will mean for business and organizational models of public-service contractor companies and the U.S. Government. The essay will continue with prescriptive guidance of whether public-service contractor companies need to take a leadership or followership role with respect to the future of ERP.
Kumar, P. (2010). Successful implementation of ERP in a large organization International journal of engineering science and technology. Vol. 2(7), 3218-3224. Retrieved from http://www.ijest.info/docs/IJEST10-02-07-151.pdf
Adoption of an ERP system enables an organization to eliminate dozens or even hundreds of separate systems and replace them with a single, integrated set of applications for the entire enterprise.
An extensive research was done to fetch the historical background of company, the functioning of its legacy systems, and the issues that are being faced by the company as a result of ERP implementation. However, there are only few studies that showed ERP case studies for the company relative to the ERP issues.The web searches provided a restricted account of data on company’s ERP profile. In order to find details of the issues that are being faced by the
In general, ERP systems are designed to standardize information entry and create data storage for information sharing across the organization. There are numerous advantages of ERP but skeptics argued on the fact that these advantages can be also achieved by simplification and lean production methods. IT systems could be effective and reliable in the long run but at the same time there is an uncertainty about whether it will align with the concerned business process. For instance, the ERP system implemented at the Korey plant to replace MRP system failed. Though it met the requirements of individual unit and enabled employees with wide range of
The adoption rate of ERP systems have drastically increased over time as it offers a vast amount of benefits to organizations. Hau and Kuzie defined an ERP system as a “multi-module, packaged business application solution that enables an organization to automate and integrate business processes and practices within the firm, share common data, manage resources, and provide access to information in a real time environment” (2010, p. 178). One major advantage of an ERP system is the integration of all the functions of an organization into a single system which brings about the smooth flow of information within the organization. The implementation of ERP ensures information shared by different functions such as accounting, distribution, manufacturing and human resources is seamless and can be accessed at any time by authorized employees only. However, the implementation of ERP systems is complex, costly and often leads to failure. Most organizations tend to modify the ERP system’s functionalities to fit into their existing business process but often end up running into challenges and sometimes failure of the ERP implementation. In the case where the features of an ERP system has been modified, a particular module or program might have an update which is not compatible with the existing system and this could lead to challenges in a production environment. These types of issue are usually encountered when the changes that occurs within the operating process of an
One of the systems SAP created is the ERP system, which has been mentioned in the introduction as Enhancing Resource Planning. Most of the business organisations are using ERP systems, however, “little is known” about ERP systems’ origins and its improvement to become one of the most important segments within the software market (Leimbach, 2008). Soliman and Youssef (1998) stated that ERP systems have assisted the progress of a “process-oriented approach” to a system development, as its database can be taken parts by several functions of particular functional units within the same business, and also built around the business development in order to enable cross-functional units. Therefore, ERP
ERP system is based on the single database system this database access to everyone in the department which provides very significant impact on the operational command on the business. It also makes easier to decision making process in the business. According to data in 2000 organization spend over 20 billion USD for ERP planning. Which rises 6.7 billion only in a year and they estimated that will be more than 27 billion next 8 years. (Wang, 2008)
Regardless of what industry your business is a part of, implementing an ERP system is a crucial venture that must be taken seriously for it necessitates strong commitment by the project team and solid support by the business leaders for guaranteed success. It is a known fact that ERP deployment is among the most costly, labour-intensive, lengthy, and complicated tasks a project team can take on.
In today 's competitive environment, organisations need to be reformed to get competitive advantages. The most efficient and effective way to achieve this goal is to introduce a new information system (IS). Chen et al (2012) One of the big systems is enterprise resources planning which is an application software which has a broad set of activities supported by many modules that integrates all business processes and data into a single system which helps businesses keep track and access to all their daily data. Jalal, a (2011)
Information technologies are becoming an inseparable part of today’s business world.ERP systems is one such example as they have become an important instrument without which the majority of enterprises could no longer function(Pabedinskait,2010).Successfully implemented ERP systems generate organisational synergy, which provides a motivation for the improvement of particularly efficient processes necessary for the success of an organisation. ERP implementation systems have become more popular within the last 15 years. They are now a common way of implementing organisational changes today. Organisations that successfully employ ERP systems, such as software and industry processes have enormous benefits such as greater efficiency. Companies that have succeeded in their respective ERP implementation include Cisco, Tektronix and Harley Davidson Motor Company.
I manage medium to large teams of technical specialists, support personnel and business consultants (both on and off shore models). I have implemented enterprise wide applications (ERP’s) including major customised software development for a diverse group of industries including utilities and local government organisations. These included business processes changes and related change management activities.
Some businesses are apprehensive about the time and costs involved in implementing an ERP system. That’s understandable, as traditional ERP software can be inflexible and take a significant amount of resources to implement.
Alpha Enterprises understands that implementing an ERP system may force the reengineering of key business processes and/or developing new business processes to support the organizations goals. Also, ERP implementation requires a massive change in an organization’s structure and affects the way people use to do work and interact. Alpha Enterprises must carefully plan a transformation that is based on adequate strategy and well defined methodology and processes of implementation. The resulting changes may significantly affect organizational structures, policies, processes, and employees.
By using ERP in an organization not only deals with the Business and IT related issues but also focuses on other aspects like customer services, inventories, production, web portals..etc. But as we are aligning IT with Business, our main objective is through machines which drives the business to new level.