preview

Arguments Against Fukushima

Better Essays

Recently, the deserted Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant has been emanating an alarming amount of radiation. Kyodo of Japan Times reported that the radiation reading has reached its highest level since its emergence in March 2011 (Kyodo, 2017). As a result, there is a greater presence of air and water pollution in Fukushima that could easily spread to surrounding areas. Therefore, it seems appropriate that in an interview with the Washington Post, radio-ecology expert Tom Hinton stated Fukushima is “an area that is among the most radioactively contaminated in the world” (as cited in Andrews, 2016). This resurgence has generated conspiracy theories, false maps and, interestingly, little news coverage. While many across different continents …show more content…

The ice wall’s 320-million-dollar cost translates to roughly 35 billion yen that the Japanese government must supply. Furthermore, it is believed to be an expensive gamble that may not even work. Fackler amplifies the ice wall’s critics in his article, stating, “some also warn that the wall, which is electrically powered, may prove as vulnerable to natural disasters as the plant itself…” (2016). The latter concern is especially feasible, but it pertains moreso to the construction of the wall instead of the wall itself. As long as the wall is overseen by strong leadership, as noted by Bridge, there should not be any glitches in the refrigeration system (2014). Moreover, alternative options for clean-up have not been successful because of the level of radiation. Phys.org reports that a “scorpion” robot crafted to withstand high radiation exposure journeyed into one of the plant’s nuclear reactors, only to abort mission after two hours (2017). Therefore, it could be assumed that if technology has not advanced enough to protect robots from extreme radiation, intervening by placing human beings under such conditions will not be effective. Additionally, from NPR’s Geoff Brumfiel’s interview with experts back in 2013, other skeptics voiced that the ice wall could work too well and limit groundwater available in the area (as cited in Domonske, 2013). This could be the result if too much coolant freezes the groundwater as …show more content…

The Fukushima ice wall had not been functioning as it should. It is reportedly “99% frozen,” (cite) and accordingly allows more groundwater to leak into the nuclear plant. However, when this problem is resolved, it should be easier to install a filtration system to purify the contaminated water. This issue is not a result of the technology itself, which has been successful in Canada and Australia as aforementioned (cite). Nonetheless, the safety of the Fukushima residents should be prioritized. AGF may not be under competent leadership at the moment, but it is a safe alternative that protects residents, scientists and engineers, and the environment at once. Fukushima’s radiation will continue to spread until many areas are inhabitable if there is not an intervention. While the ice wall may not be perfect, many should embrace it as a first attempt to deescalate a nuclear disaster. Though its results are not as successful as desired, the theoretical framework that surrounds AGF could be better implemented and save many from the dangers of radiation

Get Access