All throughout the United States, many people deal with failures. Some happen in society, some happen within a household or family, but some happen within in one’s body. Organ donation is a procedure where a donor donates a specific organ to a recipient. The donor giving the recipient an organ can either be living or deceased. According to Livescience, “the number of people on the waiting list has soared upward increasing from 31,000 in 1993 to 101,000 in 2008.” “The success rate for organ transplantation is between eighty and ninety percent”(LiveOnNY). Knowing these statistics, organ donors must be paid for their donation because it can get more people off the waiting list, money could increase the number of living donors, helps the …show more content…
One donor can save up to eight lives and improve up to fifty lives(LiveOnNY). Each year, the number of people waiting for an organ donation on the waiting list have a rapid increase. Even one little donation, such as tissue or an eye, can help them with the pain they are in. Also, according to LiveOnNY, “More than 120,000 people in the United States are waiting for organ transplants. Of these, nearly 10,000 people live right here, in the greater New York metropolitan area.” Many people on the waiting list live in the New England, which can make it harder for the donor or recipient to receive the organ it needs to …show more content…
Http://Kidney-International.theisn.org/Article/S0085-2538(15)51617-7/Fulltext. 15 Feb. 2006, kidney-international.theisn.org/article/S0085-2538(15)51617-7/fulltext.
Kuhse , Helga. “The Case for Allowing Kidney Sales .” Bioethics: An Anthology, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons , 2015, p. 421.
“LiveOnNY.” Organ Donation Facts , www.liveonny.org/about-donation/quick-facts-about-donation/.
Matas , Arthur J., and Mark Schnitzler. Payment for Living Donor (Vendor) Kidneys: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. 12 Dec. 2003, onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1600-6143.2003.00290.x/full.
Matas, Arthur J. Should We Pay Donors to Increase the Supply of Organs for Transplantation? Yes . 14 June 2008, pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC2427086/.
Organ Donation and Recovery Improvement Act – Signed into Law . health.mo.gov/living/organdonor/pdf/04ODAct.pdf.
Rettner , Rachael. Great Debate: Should Organ Donors Be Paid? 10 Aug. 2009, www.livescience.com/5606-great-debate-organ-donors-paid.html.
Severson, Dana. Monthly Salary of Transplant Surgeons . work.chron.com/monthly-salary-transplant-surgeons-23008.html.
10 Most Notable Pros and Cons of Organ Donation.
Before being paid was brought up in this survey, people were a lot more willing to donate to people they knew. When talking about donating organs those people who were willing to do donate were sixty-eight percent to people they didn’t know according to the survey taken by Ariana Eunjung Cha (Washington Post). Twenty-three percent more said that they would donate to family and friends, and nine percent said they would not donate at all. Then surveyors were asked to consider doing the same thing but in addition to fifty thousand dollars in compensation. Sixty-three percent said that the payment would make then even more likely to do it, and those willing to donate to only friends and family sixty percent of them said they would be more willing to donate. Out of the original nine percent who said they wouldn’t donate, twenty-six percent of the nine percent changed their mind and said they would reconsider because of the money. With these results, researchers said, “Thus payment motivated more US voters to positively consider donor nephrectomy rather than to reject the notion of donating a kidney” (Washingtonpost.com). In this case you can see the proof of these numbers, that more people will be willing to help complete strangers be able to live if they get compensated. Organ transplants do take place today in the world but, the donor gets the organ, the doctor gets paid, but
In the article “Kidneys for Sale: A Reconsideration,” the author, Miriam Schulman raises the notoriously controversial issue regarding organ sale. He describes the main ideas from both the supporting and the opposing side to give readers a wider view about organ sales.
'Proponents of financial incentives for organ donation assert that a demonstration project is necessary to confirm or refute the types of concerns mentioned above. The American Medical Association, the United Network for Organ Sharing and the Ethics Committee of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons have called for pilot studies of financial incentives. Conversely, the National Kidney Foundation maintains that it would not be feasible to design a pilot project that would definitively demonstrate the efficacy of financial incentives for organ donation. Moreover, the implementation of a pilot project would have the same corrosive effect on the ethical, moral and social fabric of this country that a formal change in policy would have. Finally, a demonstration project is objectionable because it will be difficult to revert to an altruistic system once payment is initiated, even if it becomes evident that financial incentives don 't have a positive impact on organ donation. '(http://www.kidney.org/news/newsroom/positionpaper03)
In conclusion, the selling of organs is a legal concern saying that the donors are going to get paid will not help get more donors. They do not know the risks involved. After reading this article readers should become more aware of the problem the modern society is having concerning kidney sales. My own opinions of this topic have changed a lot. If a patient needs a kidney it really should not matter where it came from. As long as it is viable and tested to see if it is healthy and
For this article critique, I chose to write about the New York Times article “Why People Don’t Donate Their Kidneys” by psychiatrist and lecturer Sally L. Satel. The opinion piece focused the more than 100,000 Americans waiting for a kidney donation, and why they are not receiving those donations. Even though demand from these patients is growing, the donation rate has flatlined. The author cites the inability to pay donors as the main source of the problem. Satel claims that by stigmatizing and disabling the act of rewarding organ donors, Americans lose valuable donations that could save lives.
The demand for organ donors far exceeds the supply of available organs. According to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) … there are more than 77,000 people in the U.S. who are waiting to receive an organ (Organ Selling 1). The article goes on to say that the majority of those on the national organ transplant waiting list are in need of kidneys, an overwhelming 50,000 people. Although financial gain in the U.S and in most countries is illegal, by legalizing and structuring a scale for organ donor monetary payment, the shortage of available donors could be reduced. Legalizing this controversial issue will help with the projected forecast for a decrease in the number of people on the waiting list, the ethical concerns around benefitting from organ donation, and to include compensation for the organ donor.
Please try and consider the following situation. You’re sitting in an emergency room, waiting for your dad to awake after falling into liver failure, costing him to need a new liver. Not knowing if it’s possible, crossing your fingers. You wish you could help, but you can’t. Someone else can. An organ donor. According to organdonor.gov, about 116,000 U.S. citizens are waiting on the organ transplant list as of August 2017. To put that number into perspective, that’s more than double the amount of people that can fit into Yankee Stadium. And to make matters worse, 20 people each day die waiting for a transplant.(organdonor.gov) Organ donation can offer patients a second chance at life and provides
Every day, 20 people die because they are unable to receive a vital organ transplant that they need to survive. Some of these people are on organ donation lists and some of them are not. The poor and minorities are disproportionately represented among those who do not receive the organs they need. In the United States alone, nearly 116,000 people are on waiting lists for vital organ transplants. Another name is added to this list every 10 minutes. This paper will argue that organ donation should not be optional. Every person who dies, or enters an irreversible vegetative state with little or no brain function, should have his or her organs-more specifically, those among the organs that are suitable for donation-harvested. A single healthy donor who has died can save up to eight lives (American Transplant Foundation).
In the United States, there are currently 116,608 people in need of a lifesaving organ transplant, and 75,684 people that are currently active waiting list candidates (HRSA, 2017). Between January and September 2017, there have only been 12,211 organ donors (HRSA, 2017) which is far less that the current demand for lifesaving organs. The shortage of donors could lead to an individual looking for outside sources such as the black market to find their lifesaving organ. Offering incentives to persons who chose to donate their organs or those of a deceased loved one is important because it could stop the illegal selling of organs, save the life of someone in need of an organ transplant and benefit both the donor and recipient.
Today, medical operations save lives around the world, a feat that surely would surprise our ancestors. Many operations replace defective organs with new ones; for new organs to be ready to be implanted there need to be organ donors. We are not so advanced a society that we can grow replacement organs. Thousands of organ donors in the United States every year are seen as doing the most noble of deeds in modern civilization, and most of the time death has to occur before the organ can be used. Now, though, some are suggesting that organ donors—or their beneficiaries—should be paid for their donations. This should not happen, as it creates a strain on the already tight national budget, forces
They conclude that “research shows that the underlying motivation of most paid kidney donors is poverty” and that “paid kidney donation is associated with depression, regret, and discrimination” (The State of the International Organ Trade, 2007). In other words, throwing money at the poor in exchange for their organs will not get them out of poverty. Offering a financial incentive program for organ donation will allow the rich to exploit the poor and deprive the poor from life-saving donation. The demand for organs will likely remain higher than the supply; therefore, prices for organs will become competitive and eliminate the chance for the poor to receive a transplant. Implementing financial compensation would only serve to shift the demographic of organ recipients away from those with the greatest need to those with the greatest wealth.
Recent medical advances have greatly enhanced the ability to successfully transplant organs and tissue. Forty-five years ago the first successful kidney transplant was performed in the United States, followed twenty years later by the first heart transplant. Statistics from the United Network for Organ Sharing (ONOS) indicate that in 1998 a total of 20,961 transplants were performed in the United States. Although the number of transplants has risen sharply in recent years, the demand for organs far outweighs the supply. To date, more than 65,000 people are on the national organ transplant waiting list and about 4,000 of them will die this year- about 11 every day- while waiting for a chance to extend their life through organ donation
10% of the people on the waiting list for an organ are under the age of 18. Imagine if one person in that statistic was your best friend, or your little brother or sister. The number of organ donors is slowly growing, but so is the number of people who are in need of organs. These people have the potential to live with your beneficial help.
Selling organs is a rising problem in the healthcare community, government and morality. Organ sales has become the topic of discussion for numerous reasons. Some of which being lowering the wait time on the organ transplant waitlist and taking advantage of the financially disadvantaged. This issue affects many people on many different levels, some people morally or legally but mostly importantly medically. What this basically comes down to is: “Who are we to judge what people do with their bodies?”. The answer to this question lays in many different sources. The simplified answer is no we can not tell people what they can and can not tell other people what they can and can ot do with their bodies.
Every thirty minutes someone gets added to the waiting list for an organ transplant (‘Frequently Asked Questions”). Not only that, but the number of patients being added to the waiting list is growing larger than the number of donors (“Organ Donation Statistics”). Many people are in the need of some kind of organ donation, so anyone who donates can help to save many lives. Organ donation is also such a great way to give back to people. Another thing is that to donate an organ a person does not have to pay money (“Organ Donation FAQ’s”). The only part that costs money is for the funeral if they are a deceased donor (“Organ Donation FAQ’s”).