The journey to Edessa is far and long. Yet, we must not fall short of our objective goals. The Second Crusade is launched to reclaim our fallen territories, to triumph against Nur ad-Din’s Jihad, and to broaden Christianity. Only a few figures can take on the challenge of leading the crusade to victory. As the secular monarch of Germany and the next crowned Holy Roman Emperor, I hone the best qualifications as a leader and I am a more than just a powerful candidate at the War Council of Acre. In the name of the Lord, I believe that it is my duty as a fellow Christian to protect the Holy Lands and in the honor of my fellow alliances, I will like to collaborate alongside Master Robert, the leader of the Knights Templar, and Patriarch Fulcher, …show more content…
Further Council members also question my behavior from the first debate. Although I did argue against launching the crusade in the first place, I didn’t realize the vast size of our armed forces. During my stay in Constantinople, I received a large sum of money and military equipment from Manuel I, the Byzantine Emperor. I also already recruited another army from the pilgrims I encountered in the Holy Land (Role). From having the best of my remaining German troops, the key to unlocking the Byzantine power, and the troops provided by each faction, I am confident in my abilities to lead the right decisions for …show more content…
As a secular leader with religious motives, I will like to commend Master Robert for having similar strengths as myself; we both share military experience and religious motivation. However, Master Robert is the man who is most familiar with the Levant and with eastern Europe. Every since birth, he has been on the forefront of looking for secret locations, for unknown terrains, and for unexpected weather patterns. The Knights Templars are also an extraordinary military force. The army is religiously motivated and will “repel the foes of the cross of Christ with a stalwart heart” (167). With Master Robert’s mastery of the territorial land, Patriarch Fulcher’s religious backings, and my military experience, our combined alliance is flawless. We all have the spiritual authority to fight a just war, the soldiers who will fight until the very end, and the leadership that will carry this crusade to victory. “On a final note, I ask that we should all pray, and have your brothers also pray, that God should indeed design to make our journey a success (130).” May Lord give us His
First Crusade by Fulcher of Chartres and the collection of excerpts from the letters and chronicles by Jews and Muslims are two documents relating to the climax of the invasion and conquest of lands and cities in the Middle East by European armies during the First Crusade. The climax was the siege and capture of Jerusalem. The two documents have similar, contrasting, and incomplete information. Of this incomplete and one-sided information we will discuss the different perspectives of those who lived in and near Jerusalem to those who came from outside the region.
Author Paul Crawford opens his essay with a quote from former president Bill Clinton the quote refers to the horrific actions taken by Christian crusaders against the Muslim inhabitants of Jerusalem during the First Crusade. The crusades invoke and image of Christian warriors arriving in the Middle East in waves of man and beasts intent on getting rich by fulfilling their bloodlust, and under the protection of a Christian Pope who promised eternal salvation for all who kill the Muslim horde. However, Crawford does not believe that Christian west actions were unprovoked, and he writes about the four misconceptions that are often applied to the crusades.
This investigation attempts to answer the question, what were the successes of the Third Crusade? The question is relevant or important because it focusses on the next unit and involves religious conflicts. The subtopic that will be addressed are Islamic influences on this Crusade.
Contrary to many commonly held notions about the first crusade, in his book, The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading, Jonathan Riley-Smith sets out to explain how the idea of crusading thought evolved in the first crusade. In his book, Riley-Smith sets out five main arguments to show how these ideas of crusading evolved. Firstly, he argues that Pope Urban’s original message was conventional, secondly that a more positive reaction was drawn from the laity (due to the ideas surrounding Jerusalem), thirdly, that the original message of crusading had changed because of the horrible experiences of the first crusaders, fourth, that due to these experiences the crusaders developed their own concept of what a crusade was, and lastly, that
This paper will explore the various impacts the crusades had on medieval history. Starting with a brief explanation of the crusades themselves the paper will go into detail in regards to the aforementioned impacts, which range from banking to changes in social perception. The Crusades, which took place between 1095 to 1487, were a series of military campaigns sanctioned by the Roman Catholic Church. Their creation can be credited to the 1095 conflict between the Byzantine empire and the Seljuk Turks after the latter took over Anatolia, which originally belonged to the Byzantines. Unable to fend off the Turkish forces by their own power, the Byzantine Emperor of the time, Alexios I, reached out to Pope Urban II (r. 1088-1099) for aid.
Many have priorly stated that history repeats itself time and time again. This can be seen throughout history but, especially so during the Crusades. This paper will discuss the parallels between the First and Fourth Crusade. We will also take a brief look at the aftermath of the Fourth Crusade and how it compares to the aftermath of the Second Crusade.
Accordingly, Memoirs of the Fourth Crusade has been reviewed vigorously over the past century and central among these reviews is a genuine acceptance of Villehardouin s authenticity and accountability with respect to his
Wrapped in mystery and intrigue, the Knights Templar stand out from the pages of history as the keepers of Catholicism’s greatest, most dangerous secrets. In legend, the Knights are known as the guardians of the Holy Grail, the Arc of the Covenant, and other Holy relics. Historically, they are remembered as the “Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon,” the disciplined guardians to Christian pilgrims in the Holy Land. Although the order is one of the most intriguing secret societies, the literature written on the Templars is minute and thus it is one of the least understood societies in history. Sadly, the order’s important contributions to history are so vastly overshadowed by scandal and intrigue that fact and
The brief campaign of the thirteen-century Children’s crusade was not technically a crusade in the sense that medieval Europeans understood the term and lasted only a few months during the year 1212. It lacked Papal sanction and its participants marched without the customary indulgences granted to those engaged in warfare to defend the Faith. Uncharacteristic as it was, the Children’s Crusade was a revealing chapter in medieval history, as it exemplified the depths of crusading zeal along with the unrestrained behavior of which enthusiasm and faith are capable. The children’s crusade was nothing less than a destructive movement that preyed on those in its paths, much like the earlier crusades had done. It was during the late august of 1212, that rows of zealous children and the priest guiding them had stood on the dockside of Marseilles awaiting for a parting of the Mediterranean to permit passage to the holy land. The children marched unarmed, in some notion of converting the Muslims seems to have taken place of the usual crusaders zeal for battle.
The Crusades: A Short History, written by British Historian Jonathan Riley-Smith, offers a broad overview of this part of the medieval era, but he also explores how historians have attempted to explain these events in modern terms. Riley-Smith also makes sure to note all major contributors to the Crusade movement and their personalities. Numerous scholars have wondered whether this was a political or religious mission. This helps to spark the question of why people would leave their homes and their families to risk their lives invading a land that was thousands of miles away for religious reasons. In his book, Riley-Smith makes this era come alive for the modern reader. He does
" The Crusades were more then just a war, it was a world changing event that lead to the recovers of many ancient texts, lead to the golden age of prosperity, and it tested the power of the Church. Men went on Crusades for many reasons such as pilgrimage to the Holy Land, the fear of the ongoing spread of Islam, and protection of the Holy Land. For all of those reasons to fight Christian men were united and fought
Interestingly, historians differ on the number of crusades. There is also some minor differences in the dating of the crusades. However, these is general agreement that there were at least five definitive crusades. For this discussion, we capture eight crusades (not including the Children’s Crusade of 1212) and dating provided by Walker: First Crusade 1096-1102 AD, Second Crusade 1147-1149 AD, Third Crusade 1189-1192 AD, Fourth Crusade 1202-1204 AD, Fifth Crusade 1217-1221 AD, Sixth Crusade 1228-1229 AD, Seventh Crusade 1248-1250, and Eighth Crusade 1271-1272 AD.
In The middle of the Eleventh Century The tranquillity of the eastern Mediterranean seemed assured for many years to come, but little did the people know what was ahead . This, thus embark us on a journey back into the First Crusade. In this paper I will be discussing the events that lead up to the first in a long line of crusades. I will also be mentioning the lives of some of the crusaders through letters that they wrote. The crusades were a time of confusion for most people, yet today we look back at them as a turning point.
While The Crusades may have begun with a noble intention, or set out with objectives that sought to relieve the suffering of fellow Christians, those original ideas were perverted and twisted until The Crusades were not at all noble or justified. This is particularly obvious in retrospect when we can look at history from various perspectives and draw conclusions, but it seems that even at the time it might have been obvious that the original intent had been misused in order to advance the personal aspirations of many people taking part.
In 1095, Pope Urban II called for an army to go to the Holy Land, Jerusalem. This was what was later known as the ‘First Crusade’. A crusade is a religious war or a war mainly motivated by religion. The first crusade consisted of 10’s of thousands of European Christians on a medieval military expedition to recover the Holy Land from the Muslims. This doesn’t mean that the first crusade was just motivated by religion. Throughout this essay, I will be suggesting the main reasons of why people went on crusades and which different people went for specific reasons and why.