/[1] https://nypost.com/2015/01/18/4500-cameras-in-nycs-subways-including-these-hidden-ones/
[2] https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/blue-light-waffle/
Since cameras are already integrated into subway and trains, it seems just to accommodate them into our newly proposed subway stations as well - adding to the already 4,500 cameras [1] in the NYC subway system. With observing crime comes deterring crime, many cities around the world implement passive deterring techniques which prove beneficial. Adding blue lights in the stations which turn on during the night has helped Japan [2], it has reduced crime significantly and eliminated suicide attempts at those stations. Providing blue lights in NYC stations, such as the new ones proposed can reduce
…show more content…
Yet some stations and older trains do not contain any temperature control. As the Guardian reports, temperature has a direct correlation with anger [1]. Since anger is infectious, with temperature control we can reduce irrational behavior and accidents related to emotion. Temperature increases can lead to irrational behavior due to resentment and anger already present. With anger, one loses emotional intelligence and gives way to irrational actions. A ventilation system which works to reduce temperatures in the summer automatically provides much needed comfort and safety.
These systems don’t have to be electrical. Using architecture, passive ventilation systems can be created. Wider entrances, wind friendly gates, and passages for cool air to enter and be exchanged with hot air can keep the temperature normal without constant maintenance. These cooling systems can even recycle air already present in the stations. They can take advantage of the gushes and air flows generated by trains as they arrive at the station. Passive ventilation systems can keep stations under acceptable condition using passive or active ventilation systems.
Color/ Symbol
The cameras can be used to go undercover to catch anything that can help. Officers high in rank believe that this will improve society”Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe said: `The cameras will support our officers in the many challenging situations they have to deal with, at the same time as building the public's confidence’ “. ( Davenport) the body cameras can lead to reassurance and be sure keep society and officers themselves in check. Some police task force believe that this idea will be a successful change. “.. the results from the several studies on police body cameras are encouraging.
Jamar Newsome Abstract Police departments nationwide have began to consider body cameras. Implementing body cameras department wide face many issues due to funding restrictions. Rialto Police Department faced the s
There is so much crime which occurs in our society today, which it is very difficult to put an end to it. But there is a thing which is common among these crimes which are the criminals. According to the article, "Police body Cams: Solution or scam? Nwanevu the author has stated many questions to which he gathers the responses from three panels who is Mariame Kaba a member of the Chicago antipolice violence organization, David Fleck a vice president and he is also a major manufacturer of the police body cameras, and Connor Boyack who is a president of Utah 's Liberates Institute. This article mentions the popular magazine such as Time magazine, this magazine reports that over a quarter of the country 's police departments are already testing or actively using cameras, including the NYPD and the LAPD (Nwanevu, 2015). Also the author Nwanevu states that The Obama administration has called for the federal funding to support the deployment of as many as 50,000 devices to state and local law enforcement agencies. The administration 's reasoning captures the perspective of most camera supporters. According to the status the usage by police officers will help sustain trust between law enforcement agencies and the communities they interact with (Nwanevu, 2015). Reformers have suggested that the video could have gone a long way towards resolving the ambiguities of the Michael Brown case where eyewitnesses had given conflicting stories and also the death of Eric Garner according to
Although there is an enormous amount of controversy concerning the use of red-light-running cameras, the bottom line is with proper implementation, this technology shows promise in reducing fatality rates and increasing public safety.
Before the creation of these cameras, complaints about police officers were numerous. By using these cameras, studies have shown that they enhance officers’ behaviors and have also helped reduce citizen complaints. “They found that the ‘officers wearing the cameras had 87.5 percent fewer incidents of use of force and 59 percent fewer complaints than the officers not wearing the cameras,’ the report states”
“We want to provide people with the ability to view what we do”(Hermann/Davis). Cameras will allow the community to see what police officers do on a daily job, and also show the abilities of the officers. With this it will allow the the public to get a first hands view on how the police system works and also how the intentions of police officers, are not to hurt but to protect. “...record all interactions between police and the members of the community(Hauslohner). By recording all the interaction the the police come into, may cause the citizens to become more calmer.
In the United States, in particular, policies such as this may be necessary to reduce police shootings and abuse of suspects. “In 2011, police killed six people in Australia, two in England, six in Germany and, according to an FBI count, 404 in the United States. And that FBI number counted only “justifiable homicides,” and was comprised of voluntarily submitted data from just 750 of 17,000 law enforcement agencies” (Stanley). The hope is that the implementation of these cameras reduces these numbers by a significant margin by providing reason for both the cops and the criminals to be more controlled. The use of cameras could also decrease the fear of police officers in routine crime stops if the citizen is aware that the officer’s actions are being recorded and
Body cameras have been on top of everybody’s mind at supervising cops. Law enforcement, for their part, should not see body cameras as a threat. Police officers have taken on one of the most dangerous jobs in our society. It is as much as for their benefit as much as it is for the population. Gandhi once said that we "must make the injustice visible," and that is the real advantage of body cameras. Body cameras have the probability not only to expose when cops break the rules, but to protect these cops should a suspect assault an officer or for video evidence in
used to prevent more crime from happening in certain areas. Moreover, the cameras are used to
“The threat of blood on the tracks has become constant as the number of passengers surges to a level unseen since 1948”, Andrea Peyser writes in “Subways are New York’s Biggest Deathtrap”. The New York Post reported several subway incidents happened in the past weeks: a man in a wheelchair fell onto the tracks and was struck by a train in Brooklyn (Moore), a woman was shoved onto the tracks and killed by a train in Times Square (Furfaro), a man was pushed onto the tracks and injured (Moore), and a teenage boy found dead on the tracks in Bronx (Prendergast). These alarming number of incidents raised the public concern for subway safety, which made “MTA board member Charles Moerdler… [to renew] a push to have the doors installed on New York City’s
“In the first year after the camera 's introduction, the use of force by officers’ decline 60%, and citizens’ complaints against police fell 88%”. (Christopher Mims) The introduction of police body cameras impacted the world in many better ways than bad. But, police body cameras were introduced due to the public 's awareness to police brutality and numerous of publicity deaths which has impacted the outcome of police interactions.
Several studies, such as those done by Barak Ariel, et al. have demonstrated a very strong connection between the use of body-worn cameras and reduction of complaints (Ariel et al., “The Effect”) (Ariel, et al., “Contagious...”). There is also an argument to be made for the relationship between the police and their communities. If the departments invest in things that make the public feel safer, such as body-worn cameras, then they will in turn be safer, as their communities will not feel threatened by their presence, but protected.
With the increasing emergence of traffic cameras around the nation, there has emerged a debate about whether the cameras are effectively functioning to keep drivers safe or whether they are just another source of revenue for cites. Facts have proven that the purpose for the traffic cameras is simply generating more money for the cities. The estimated amount of money that the city of Denver will be making in 2011 from these cameras (Kaminsky)—excluding the ones recently put up—a grand estimation total of seven million dollars… “According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety more than 550 communities in the United States use red light cameras.” (Urie) Research shows how the cameras are not improving safety for drivers, and for
First off, wearing body worn cameras will provide better security to both police officers and civilians. In an experiment composed by the University of Cambridge’s Institute of Criminology (IoC), in which police officers in Rialto, California wore cameras as a part of their uniform for one year., results gathered from the experiment proved to be beneficial. According to the experiment, “... use-of-force by officers wearing cameras fell by 59% and reports against officers dropped by 87%...” (Lewsey). This proves that BWC’s have a positive effect on police
Times. http://www.nytimes.com.2008/02/19/world /americas/19iht-princeton.1.10175351.html Fitzsimmons, W. 2014. Time out or Burn out for the Next Generation. Retrieved from