Argument Against Nusenda

Also please be advised that I, Omar Warrad will pursue all available legal remedies, including seeking monetary damages, injunctive relief, and an order that you pay court costs and attorney’s fees.

On October 29th, 2015, I made the trip to small claims court at the Superior Court North County Division in Vista, California. The case I observed was a contract dispute between Michael Mendell and Ediga Narashima. The plaintiff (Mendell) was sueing the defendant (Narashima) for $4,000 over a breach of contract. Narashima had given Mendell the opportunity to build theatre system and a bookshelf for his home. They both came to an agreement that the total cost of this procedure would be $4,100. Mr. Mendell is a professor at APT College where he teaches telecommunications. Mendell claims that the full $4,100 was never paid to him. During the whole process of the build there was many setbacks and problems that arose. Mendell claimed that while he was working on this home theatre project, he missed out on work and money he could have obtained from his other job as a professor. That is the reason why he is sueing Narashima as well as the fact that Mendell claims Narashima did not pay him his final installment of $300 for the job. Ediga Narashima claims that the final installment was paid through a friend or third party named Mario Diaz. Mario was a friend of both the plaintiff and defendant. He had referred Mendell to Narashima for the job. Mendell counterclaims that he had never received the final installment from Mario. The big question is to whether Mario had payed the final installment to Mendell as they agreed in

As you may see I'm trying to satisfy the requirements you have on a side of the fact that your office did not provided almost any support nor information, till you was assigned on my case, as required by law to assist me in this matter.

We have also received correspondence from co-defendant’s attorney, Law Offices of Stacey L. Tokunaga, requesting any information supporting the filing of our Application for Adjudication of Claim. We have also

On May 18, 2016, the CP was given an appointment to come to the office on May 29, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. to complete the paperwork on the alleged father in the case. The CP failed to appear for the appointment on May 29, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. A Grantee Refusal Notice was sent to the TANF worker on the same date of the non-cooperation resulting in the sanction. On June 16, 2016, the CP contacted the office in reference to the sanction. The CP stated that she received the letter three days ago. The CSW explained to the CP that the appointment letter was mailed on May 18, 2016 and that her appointment was set for May 29, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. which she failed to appear. It was explained to the CP that she could come in on June 24, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. and that once she comes in, Child Support would send a memo to TANF stating that she complied. Also on the same date, a letter was mailed to the CP to come in and update the paperwork with more information regarding James Hall. On July 5, 2016, the CP contacted the office and verified her address. She stated that she came in the office on June 24, 2016 and had a one-on-one meeting with the TANF worker. The CSW informed the CP that she would send an email to the TANF worker to verify that the she came in the office and complied

We recommend that the lien/levy remain in place and any money collected to be applied to arrears

Client reported she is paid $40.00 dollars towards her waiver for her Domestic Violence in installment. Client continues to reports her new balance is $20.00. Once she finishes with the waiver, the case will drop to a Disoriented Conduct.

Get Everything In Writing: Make sure any debt collectors contacting you follow up in writing; they are required by law to do so within five days of initially calling you. If you feel you do not owe the amount they

I attended a hearing on your behalf in the above matter before Judge Tsyn in Poughkeepsie, New York on 06/01/2017. The claimant was present but unrepresented.

Debt Collect Recover LLC. is in danger. The lack of effective communication, particularly as it ties into the desire to expand the company, is an ongoing problem. As a company DCR is getting nickeled and dimed in every aspect of the communication process. From lengthy commutes for

My name is Sarah Suchodolski and I am the attorney representing Novelty Products, Inc. It has been brought to my attention that you purchased $30,000 worth of tabletop lighters from Novelty Products, Inc. One month later, you returned the lighters and refused to pay the total cost of $30,000. The president Novelty Products, Inc. (“Novelty”) explained that your two companies have an established procedure requiring payment within 30 days of receiving the product. You have failed to meet this condition.

I currently find myself, unable to meet the terms of my marker agreement. In an attempt to satisfy my obligations, I am requesting that payments arrangements be made to meet marker obligations at Harrah’s properties. I have recognized that I have a gambling compulsion and have recently reach out to Gambling Anonymous and the1-800-GAMBLER hotline for help. Although the markers are not yet due, I recognize that payments are the only way I can satisfy this debt. Request the marker be held and converted to payments verse an account debit. I understand that you are under no obligation to accept payment arrangements, but ask for your patience and assistance. Over the past months, I have completely depleted my savings and 401K plans to satisfy my

Per the financial reconciliation findings, Fiscal resumed Support obligation effective 7/11/13, as the case was suspended on 5/19/11 until after the NCP is to be released from incarceration. NCP was released from incarceration on 8/25/12. Fiscal adjusted the balance of CA account to $4871. 57 and the PA account balance to $8553. 00. Total arrearage due as of today is $13424. 87. Fiscal forward financial reconciliation to worker A.

The telephone rings. It 's one of those collection calls we all have gotten at least once (if not more). “You owe a debt”, the ominous voice on the other end of the line says. “How will you pay it?”

The ideas that form contemporary nonnaturalist thought can be derived from the work of G.E. Moore, a philosopher who worked in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. His book Principia Ethica is considered the foundation for the nonnaturalist argument and changed the way in which philosophers approach ethics as a whole. Matthew Chrisman, a modern philosopher who teaches and researches as the University of Edinburgh, wrote What is This Thing Called Metaethics?, a textbook on metaethics covering each major school of thought regarding metaethical inquiry.